Home » Broadband Speed »Cinergy MetroNet »Comcast/Xfinity »Community Networks »Competition »Frontier »Public Policy & Gov't »Verizon »Video » Currently Reading:

Tippecanoe and Fiber to the Home Too: Indiana Community Says Yes to Fiber Broadband

A western Indiana fiber-to-the-home project first envisioned more than five years ago is finally moving forward as it wins unanimous approval at the Tippecanoe County Redevelopment Commission.

Lafayette and West Lafayette, Ind., home to prestigious Purdue University, has a broadband problem.  Broadband advocates claim current providers Comcast and Frontier Communications underserve Tippecanoe County.  The former has put western Indiana on the “long list” waiting for service upgrades, and Frontier Communications offers little more than slow speed DSL in the region.  While Purdue arranges for its own Internet connectivity, off-campus students and area residents have had to make due with what the local cable and phone company offers, which isn’t much according to the locals.

“Comcast service has recently improved, but there is a big difference between Comcast service in a city like Chicago and what they deliver this part of Indiana,” shares Stop the Cap! reader Nick Jefferson, who tipped us to the recent developments.  “Frontier is a complete waste of time, and they have alienated customers across Indiana after taking over from Verizon Communications.”

In 2005, Tippecanoe County officials met with Verizon to encourage construction of its FiOS fiber-to-the-home network in western Indiana, as it had planned for the eastern Indiana city of Fort Wayne.  But Verizon sold off its Indiana landline operations to Frontier Communications, which has since shown little interest in expanding the fiber to the home network it inherited.  Now the county is considering financing a fiber network itself, to be ultimately run and administered by Cinergy MetroNet, which already provides service in the Indiana communities of Connersville, Greencastle, Huntington, Madison, New Castle, North Manchester, North Vernon, Seymour, Vincennes, and Wabash.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WLFI Lafayette Ultra-high-speed net may be headed here 3-21-11.flv

WLFI-TV explained the basics of the new fiber-to-the-home network and how it will be paid for in this report from March, 2011.  (2 minutes)

The $40-50 million project would not come out of taxpayer funds directly.  Instead, a novel financing approach would cover construction costs over a 15-20 year period using a combination of MetroNet investor funds and a “tax increment financing” district, which would provide a temporary tax abatement during the period the network is being paid off.  Taxpayer dollars would not be exposed — the financial risks would be to MetroNet and its investors alone.

A fiber to the home service would provide a network capable of gigabit broadband speeds, but historically Cinergy has offered lower speeds to their other Indiana customers, albeit at highly competitive pricing, along with packages of video and phone service.

Larry Oates, head of the West Lafayette redevelopment commission for the project, says the fiber network delivers more than just the promise of better broadband service

“This project could be a great economic development tool,” Oates told The Exponent. “It is up to the businesses and residents who live here to decide what to do with it. We are just facilitating their potential.”

The County Commissioners will decide later whether to give the project a final approval.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WLFI Lafayette Tippecanoe County moves forward with plans for Fiber to Home 1-9-12.mp4

WLFI in Lafayette reports Tippecanoe’s fiber to the home network has gotten unanimous approval from the country redevelopment commission.  (2 minutes)

Share

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. Fred says:

    Please ask Cinergy metro net to bring FTTH to Laurens, SC. We here desperately need competition for Charter, PRTC (AT&T) and that horrible Frontier (get out of South Carolina!!).

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Ken R: Stopping people from shopping around seems a little communist! cable is no different than paying for anything else car's.TV's Computers, Cellphones, w...
  • Twizted: Oh its wanted 3.1 Docsis speeds for sure; the problem is big content providers and their pricing schemes are the number one major obstacle along with ...
  • James R Bivins: Your right other countries are leaven the usa behind.When usa please companies and leaves the customers behind.And charter is getting faster,but leavi...
  • James: He was amazing as FCC chair and you are right, he was building his resume, each group he talked to would think they were his key focus....cable won th...
  • James R Bivins: Everytime I see ad saying,they want new customers.They don't know how to get them.They talk expandion,that means update services,that should be update...
  • Andrew Madigan: I wonder what that does to the "private" wifi network. If they're sharing an antenna I bet the private network gets to fight the public network for wi...
  • Phillip Dampier: I have been looking and running into "proprietary battery" blockades. I don't believe the battery was created specifically for this device, but I do s...
  • Phillip Dampier: I can't imagine a firmware update could not correct this, but you are right you need a replacement for now because who knows exactly when that update ...
  • Phillip Dampier: The SIM card change may help restore some connectivity, but it does not resolve the degraded 4G performance. Run some speed tests. If you are in the 1...
  • Bill K: Sorry, here is the image link: http://postimg.org/image/fwpd7ttgz/...
  • Bill K: Here is a screen grab of the battery from the FCC ID submission. I am also interested in an alternate source, $35 is a bit expensive. Thank you for an...
  • John Case: I just spoke to an employee at a local Verizon authorized partner, and he indicated that the only way to really fix the phone is to replace it. He cla...

Your Account: