Home » Broadband Speed »Community Networks »Competition »Editorial & Site News »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

Travesty: North Carolina’s Telecom Companies Oppose 4Mbps Broadband Service in Rural Areas

Despite today's setback, North Carolina's broadband hero is Rep. Bill Faison, who stood up for rural broadband.

In the North Carolina legislature’s Finance Committee, a one week timeout “to hear views from the public” actually means giving breathing room for cable and phone lobbyists to strip away surprise amendments not to their liking.  This morning, in a catastrophe for consumers, the state’s largest phone and cable companies got legislators to wipe out a provision that would have helped guarantee rural North Carolina at least 4Mbps broadband service, either from existing providers or new ones that develop in their absence.

During debate of H.129, the anti-Community Broadband bill, North Carolina consumer interests were kept out of sight and mind as lobbyists worked their magic to get rid of Rep. Bill Faison’s (D-Caswell, Orange) amendment that would set the state’s minimum acceptable definition of broadband at 4Mbps with a 1Mbps upload speed.  With the help of several flip-flopping representatives, they got their wish.

Faison’s amendment was designed to open the door to someone — anyone – to bring broadband into rural areas of the state.  While Time Warner Cable, AT&T, and CenturyLink dawdle, large numbers of rural residents simply go without any broadband service.  Faison’s amendment was simple and reasonable — if at least half of an area is not served with 4/1Mbps service, provisions should be made to allow local communities, if they wish, to establish service themselves to get the job done.

Last week, when Faison’s amendment appeared to be headed for incorporation into the bill, industry lobbyists blanched and fled the room, raising vocal objections and demanding a week timeout before a vote was taken.  After winning their reprieve, they managed to get the Republican majority in line to throw rural North Carolina under the bus, uniformly opposing Faison’s amendment.  Two Democrats, one representing the city where Time Warner Cable’s regional division is headquartered, joined them.

Hall of Shame: Rep. Carney does not care about North Carolina's digital divide.

In its place, they substituted a new amendment which defined broadband in the state of North Carolina as any service occasionally capable of achieving 768kbps downstream and 200kbps upstream.  That represents “well-served” among these industry-friendly legislators.

Among the worst offenders that stood out today were Reps. Jeff Collins (R-Nash) and Becky Carney (D-Mecklenburg).  Last week, they were standing with North Carolina consumers.  This week, they are voting for the interests of the cable and phone companies.  Rep. Carney, who lists her occupation as “homemaker”, voted to guarantee North Carolina families years of slow, expensive and erratic broadband service, if available at all.  Collins supported an amendment that says Nash County residents should do just fine with broadband speeds that don’t even manage to break 1Mbps.

The bill next moves to the floor of the House for consideration.

What is missing from this debate is a realization on the part of the legislature cable and phone lobbyists do not want anyone delivering basic broadband service in rural North Carolina unless it comes from them, and to date they have shown no interest in delivering it.

After all the debate, here is a fact no one can ignore.  The only networks in the state capable of delivering world class 100Mbps broadband are two fiber based community-owned networks in Wilson and Salisbury.  The companies that want to see them out of business see 768kbps as more than adequate to define broadband availability in North Carolina.  When members of the Finance Committee agreed, it helps explain how the state has managed to rank 41st in broadband excellence.

It’s time to ask your legislators what side they are on.  Yours or the state’s cable and phone companies.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. North Carolina Phone & Cable Companies Decry Municipal Broadband While Living Large on Public Tax Breaks Themselves
  2. You Win! Consumers Fighting Back Help Kill Municipal Broadband Ban in North Carolina
  3. North Carolina S.1209 Final Wrap-Up — Prepare for Stage Two of the Battle
  4. The Truth About North Carolina’s Community Networks Told in Four Minutes
  5. Time Warner’s Propaganda Campaign Against North Carolina’s Community Networks

Currently there are 5 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    How can we compete with South Korea when these political hacks think 1990s speeds are fast enough?

  2. Matt says:

    They are determined to keep our state in the internet stone age.

  3. Mark Turner says:

    Let’s not forget Rep. William Wainwright (D-Craven), one of the primary sponsors of the bill.

    Wainwright voted lockstep against the Democratic leadership every single time. He also consulted with a TWC lobbyist throughout the whole session. According to Rep. Wainwright’s campaign finance reports, he’s received $7,500 from the telecom industry:

    CenturyLink: $4,000
    AT&T: $2,000
    Verizon: $1,000
    TWC: $500

    http://www.app.sboe.state.nc.us/webapps/cf_rpt_search/cf_report_doc_results.aspx?ID=STA-C1573N-C-001&OGID=1865

    http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/members/viewMember.pl?sChamber=H&nUserID=102
    Sad, sad.

  4. Scott says:

    Does this have to be signed by the Governor?? If so can she veto it?

  5. Steve says:

    I wish there was some way to help. It’s definitely heartbreaking to watch communities get beat down by politicians that are compromised due to their relationship with corporations.

    Maybe it’s time for a revolution.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Scott: You're partly correct about a new access point or router helping them. The problem with consumer or lower quality wireless access points is they do...
  • txpatriot: I was just yanking your chain (and being an @$$)....
  • Phillip Dampier: I take your point, but honestly have not considered Panera Bread's Wi-Fi problems as part of the fight against broadband caps....
  • txpatriot: "You should not read into every story written here as an effort to prove some point." Of course not -- that's why the website is titled "Stop the C...
  • James R Curry: Hey Phillip, It's a thorny subject. There are a lot of coffee shops that set themselves up as places for people to come and meet and work and stud...
  • Phillip Dampier: I don't have any position to take regarding Panera. It's a free Wi-Fi service. If I go into Panera Bread, I am honestly there to buy their food, not t...
  • Alex Perrier: Another option is speed caps. i've experienced speeds of anywhere from 1 Mbit/s to 6 Mbit/s at Bell Wi-Fi hotspots. i think this is reasonable. Tho...
  • George Douglas: Cisco had nothing to do with this. Verizon Network Integration is the vendor. Gianato was told five days prior to the contract being signed that these...
  • Smith6612: True. All of the above works fine. Even then though, I don't think they need to spend money replacing their current gear with something from Meraki fo...
  • Tk: Perhaps Phillip is blaming the wireless phone company caps for this situation at Panera. "The problem has gotten even worse since wireless phone co...
  • txpatriot: Interesting situation. The commenters providing suggested solutions are even more interesting, but what I find MOST interesting is that, provided...
  • AP: No surprise here. Traditional TV has NOTHING on except for stupid reality shows and unfunny sitcoms. I do most of my TV watching online but for sports...

Your Account: