Home » Comcast/Xfinity »Competition »Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Net Neutrality »Online Video »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband »Video »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Required Viewing: Sen. Al Franken Explains Big Telecom’s Big Plans to Charge You More

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Franken FCC Net Neutrality Plan Flawed 12-20-10.flv

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) took to the Senate floor this weekend to explain his strong opposition to the proposed Comcast-NBC/Universal merger, how some of the nation’s largest telecom companies use limited competition to maintain confiscatory pricing for service, and why feeding the Big Telecom beast with favors requested in multi-million dollar lobbying campaigns will cost ordinary Americans more money for less service in the future.  Franken’s remarks are a refreshing change of pace from the usual Congressional rhetoric, reduced to “Obama’s takeover of the Internet,” “socialist broadband,” and “Maoist net policies” we usually hear about.  It’s well worth the time to educate yourself about Big Telecom’s agenda.  (25 minutes)

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. Lexster says:

    Just listened to the whole thing and I’ve got to say that I think more people like Franken need to be in Congress. I may not agree with some of the things he is for, but he’s obviously the kind of person who will stick by their beliefs and not allow them to be swayed by party lines or monetary “gifts” like many other congressmen *coughJohnMcCaincoughcough*. That being said, there were just a few things I noticed during his speech:

    1. Franken made a point that people have choices when they go into a grocery store or restaurant, as opposed to when they choose an ISP. I’m sure he was just trying to simplify the issue, but really, much of the “choice” we are given in stores is just an illusion. Most “store brands” are manufactured in the same plants and factories as many name brands. No matter where your money goes, much of the time, it goes to one of four or five huge conglomerates such as Franken-mentioned General Mills or Kraft or Dole or ConAgra Foods. This, of course, undermines Franken’s point about voting with your wallet. You only think you’re voting with your wallet, but really it’s the same food with a different label. It would be like if Comcast bought Time Warner Cable, but kept their name as Time Warner, then said “See? Now you have a choice.”

    2. Franken made a point about YouTube competing with Google Video and how it would have hurt YouTube if Google could have bought a “fast lane” to load more quickly than YouTube. While this is true, he completely missed the point that Google simply bought YouTube, thereby “buying its competition”, which is an anti-competitive practice in itself. Again, I realize he was just trying to simplify the issue, but it stuck out to me since it also undermines his overall point.

    3. He used the same point for Facebook and I think that one is more apt than the YouTube example for obvious reasons as I stated above.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • JD: CLEAR has without a doubt been the absolute BEST internet service I’ve ever (and I’ve used several ISP’s since 1991) used, PERIOD!!! Will Sprint ...
  • Jason: I agree, cap to limit congestion is a lie. So with capping everyone you have high congestion for the first two weeks of the billing cycle then it fal...
  • Jason: I work from home and I'll be damned if they are going to charge me any fees or cap my usage. Just wait until Google fiber comes to Phoenix and the ex...
  • chris: was just curious to what cox had to say about all this cash cow bussiness and heres what they told me Thank you for choosing Cox Communications....
  • Joe V: I hope the people of New Jersey are happy. They voted for Chris Christie and this is exactly what they got....
  • Susan: After diligently watching my credit score for over a year and how negative as well as positive postings affect it, I have a hard time believing that o...
  • David Therchik: An intense investigation needs to put into this! As soon as one starts I bet they'll stop charging/cheating people from over usage. Before they bought...
  • Charles Bingham: I did but customer no service was no help - said it did no good to have pass word with symbols, cap and small letters and #'s. IF only I had an alte...
  • Phillip Dampier: That assumes this customer had access to a working usage meter and notification messages and ignored them. Evidently it was big enough of a problem fo...
  • Are you kidding me...: "Over the years" people are using the internet differently. If your bill went up, you have usage. Responsible would be calling and talking to them ab...
  • Charles Bingham: Actually my usage has decreased over the years as I sold my business and only kept the internet for a few tax returns that I still do, no employees no...
  • Are you kidding me...: This entire article reeks of "poor me, I'm a victim and I can't be responsible about my own Internet usage, my own bills or my own actions." Grow up....

Your Account: