Home » Internet Overcharging »Online Video » Currently Reading:

TV-Sized Ad Loads Coming to Online Video? – With Overcharging Schemes, You’ll Pay More to Watch Them

Phillip Dampier February 15, 2010 Internet Overcharging, Online Video No Comments

Advertising Age this week predicted online TV could be about to undergo a transformation — into the online equivalent of advertising-packed traditional television.

Starting as early as this fall, that 47 minute “hour long” show you’ve watched with a handful of commercial interruptions may become a 59 minute show, with almost 15 minutes of additional advertising piled on your viewing experience.  Worst of all, if your service provider wants to stick you with a usage allowance or “consumption billing,” you will effectively be paying to watch commercials.

Imagine after receiving your monthly pay television bill, a company representative arrives to install a coin meter on the side of your TV.  Your monthly fee just gives you access to the channels, he explains.  Actually watching them costs more.

Why introduce more advertising?

Nielsen, a ratings measurement service, will start providing its subscribers ad viewing information regardless of whether the viewer sees it on a traditional television or online.  The catch is the advertising must be the same across platforms.  That means online video could run the same ads your local station or cable network carries.

“The financial models used for the current large video hubs in the online space are not sustainable,” said Jack Wakshlag, chief research officer for Time Warner’s Turner Broadcasting. One way to make online viewing more financially lucrative, several TV executives suggested, is to use it to aggregate viewing of popular shows across TV, online and other emerging media — and then use that rating as a means of negotiating for the cost of an ad against the program.

What’s lending traction to the idea of increasing the number of commercials in online TV runs is the “TV Everywhere” concept currently embraced by industry players Time Warner and Comcast, among others. Under the plan, cable subscribers would be able to watch their favorite shows via broadband for no extra fees, while non-subscribers would be blocked. If the media companies can use this idea to control how consumers watch TV programming, they may also be able to force a more traditional amount of advertising on them, too.

Even worse, many online video providers like Hulu are considering charging viewers their own fees, leaving consumers paying three times – twice in money for broadband service and a subscription fee, once in time wasted sitting through unstoppable ads.

Some consumers don’t mind the trade-off as long as viewing remains free.  But with Internet Overcharging schemes, online video ads count against your allowance.

One TV executive told the trade magazine research suggests that 80% to 90% of people would rather watch TV online with the same load of ads as a traditional TV show if it meant doing so for free. “People don’t want to pay more subscription fees on top of their cable subscription fee,” this executive said.

It is likely testing of full commercial loads will precede any large scale rollout, if only to gauge consumer reaction.  If people refuse to pay to watch commercial advertising, the industry will have to go back to the drawing board to come up with other ideas to monetize online video.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Sky Hits Pause Button on Online Video: Internet Overcharging Schemes Kill Sky Online Video in New Zealand
  2. The Coming Online Video War: Cable Customers Start Looking for Alternatives As Rate Increases Continue
  3. Frontier Communications Launches Online Video Site With 100,000 Videos You Can Already See Elsewhere Online
  4. AT&T Joins the Parade of Online Video Portals
  5. Comcast’s XFINITY TV Now Online, But Watching Counts Against Your Usage Cap

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Jeremy: Keep it up Crime Warner, Google will soon be a competitor of yours here in KC and then I can dump your internet and atrocious cable/cable box....
  • Mileena: Welp, just let us know when we have to start protesting......
  • Phillip Dampier: I love the industry argument that network builds in rural area just don't make sense. But they still manage to fund lobbying campaigns to keep munici...
  • Phillip Dampier: Verizon FiOS is deregulated. In fact, both Verizon and AT&T have fought for the ultimate in "hands off" telecom regulation: the statewide franchise f...
  • Phillip Dampier: I am more convinced than ever Genachowski is not going to stay as chairman during a second Obama administration. He was angling for a position at the ...
  • Phillip Dampier: You are evidently a new reader here. Service complaints, outages, and policy changes for TV, broadband, and phone service have all been covered here f...
  • Phillip Dampier: I think I answered your question. I don't have any problem with customers being able to roam on cable Wi-Fi networks. You are the one using the wor...
  • Scott: Last I checked Marriott and Cadillac dealerships weren't essential services that affect citizens access to public online services, education, and gene...
  • Jordan Kratz: Genachowski is just as Corrupt as the rest of this Government.Within 5 - 20 years i am more and more believing a real revolution or a complete falling...
  • Jeremy: "It just depends on who has his ear the most." It's definitely not us little American consumers....
  • thad: Either Genachowski is ignorant (which as the FCC chairman he is paid not to be) or he is working to the benefit of current, traditional, Teleco behemo...
  • Sean: A phone company says having customers with working phones is a harmful business model? WTH?...

Your Account: