Home » Uncategorized » Currently Reading:

Qwest: The Phone Company Nobody Wanted

Phillip Dampier February 9, 2010 Competition, Qwest, Rural Broadband 3 Comments

Qwest, born from a merger between US West and Qwest Communications is up for sale.  Again.  Actually, analysts are wondering exactly when Qwest wasn’t for sale over the last several years.  Like that odd house on the corner of your street that nobody wants to buy, Qwest keeps lowering its asking price, hoping would-be suitors will stop driving past.

Qwest's service area

Qwest has a lot going against it.  Unlike its bigger cousin Baby Bells, mostly absorbed into the AT&T or Verizon Continuum, Qwest is saddled with a service area that often spells r-u-r-a-l.  The company got the short end of the stick when the Bell System was carved up in the mid-1980s, stuck with Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.  That’s a service territory shaped like a “T” which spells “trouble.”  Outside of a few major cities like Phoenix, Denver, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Salt Lake City, and Seattle, the rest of Qwest Country is desert, ranch land, mountain ranges, farms, prairies, and some nice lakes and rivers.

While a great place to vacation, these spectacular landscapes are not what investors are looking for when considering what to do with a 100-year old copper wire telephone system.  Qwest never even managed to launch its own cell phone service, instead relying on reselling Verizon Wireless to interested customers.  Its foray into the cable TV business also flopped, and the company currently resells satellite TV service to customers.

The company was plagued with insider trading and other allegations of financial irregularities in the mid-2000s, and since 2005 has been rumored to be on the sales block.

The asking price keeps dropping, along with the company’s value.  Originally worth $45 billion dollars ten years ago, Qwest can’t attract buyers even at half the price.

Customers aren’t very impressed either.  In Lake County, Minnesota, the local newspaper printed a damning editorial Thursday accusing the company of being a villainous, untrustworthy liar after phone service went out for virtually the entire North Shore of Minnesota:

We’d like to have a villain in this story, but, so far, that character sketch is thin. Qwest is fitting the bill if you like obsequiousness on par with cigarette or multinational food companies.

Qwest touted the promise of high-tech 911 service, fast internet, a better connected North Shore. They’ve turned out to be good at promises but lousy on delivery when things go wrong.

The Lake County News-Chronicle excoriated Qwest in an editorial published last Thursday

Most people heard “All circuits are busy, please try your call again later” on their phones Tuesday. For more than a week, we’ve heard the same line from Qwest regarding what happened in Duluth and why there wasn’t a reroute up the Shore.

You can’t help becoming wary about how our technological infrastructure works after such failure Tuesday. Everyone was surprised to know that when fiber optic goes, so do cell phones. It was even more surprising to know that there was no detour for the line up the Shore. But that wasn’t technological indifference. That was a trust we put in Qwest.

[...]

It’s different when Qwest lies about why its line failed and we find out its assurance about a reroute was pure fantasy. There ends any trust or understanding to calmly wait out its line failures.

With Qwest, everything has been below the ground, literally and figuratively. It’s answer that repairing fiber optic is “difficult,” the empty promise of rerouting, and the lack of explanation of the real cause of the damage in Duluth, are all unacceptable.

It’s as if Qwest prefers a cloak of mystery about its technology and we should be happy to have it at all. That’s a poisoned relationship to have with fiber optic as it becomes ubiquitous in our lives.

Qwest, tell us what really happened under that street in Duluth, and, if it was the result of your own negligence, own up to it. Tell us why you told customers, including agencies responsible for public safety, you had a plan, a reroute in the case of a line break, but really didn’t.

And tell us why we should trust you again with this vital link to safety, health, and business along the North Shore.

While plots can be richer for their villains, we’d rather not have one in this story.

Ouch.

The Wall Street Mergers & Acquisition-vultures are circling over the company again, raising the stakes that Qwest is once again the common-sense choice for a takeover.  But even they realize nobody may want the entire company, saddled with rural states’ phone customers over an aging network that will cost billions to upgrade.  So the next best thing is to carve up the profitable bits and sell those to the highest bidder.  Companies like AT&T, Verizon, and BellSouth could do well serving the major population centers in Qwest’s territory, leaving folks in states like Wyoming, Idaho, Montana and the Dakotas to their choice of likely “rural telco” suitors: CenturyLink, Frontier Communications, or Windstream.  Qwest’s valued fiber optic network could fetch a billion or more on the open market.  Their data centers could manage another cool billion if sold.

As Qwest’s revenue continues to decline, the company is likely going to continue cutting costs, keeping themselves as attractive as possible to would-be suitors.

“It gets harder and harder to keep cutting costs,” Donna Jaegers, an analyst with D.A. Davidson & Co. told the Denver Post.  “As (former WorldCom chief executive) Bernie Ebbers used to say, ‘There’s no more lemon juice left in that lemon.’ ”

Just ask customers on the North Shore of Minnesota, as they sip Qwest’s bitter lemonade.

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. Ian L says:

    If someone were to buy Qwest I’d guess AT&T would buy up the larger cities, which are being upgraded to VDSL2 anyway, and Frontier or CenturyLink would get more rural areas, assuming the company finally relented and allowed itself to be carved up into different portions. Not sure who the long haul network would go to; Cogent seemed interested awhile back. Maybe NTT America would take both the network and the data centers…

  2. Ian L says:

    Also, Qwest used to have its own cellular service, before shutting it down and moving everyone to Sprint, then shhutting Sprint based service down and moving everyone to Verizon.

    Heck, Verizon might buy up the urban components of Qwest; the company has several large metro areas in its footprint. If, that is, Verizon is able to quickly sell off (or not buy in the first place) rural areas also owned by the provider.

  3. Mike says:

    As an individual, I would like to use Qwest, if only because they stood up to the federal government to help maintain privacy rights during Bush’s administration:

    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/tech/article/0,2777,DRMN_23910_5719566,00.html







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Andy: why isnot 21GB usage fair for a 1Mbit connection? If I take 1million bits per second time #seconds in a day and multiply by 30 days and divide by 8 t...
  • Earl Cooley III: I'm never going to get digital phone from my cable company; I think it's a hideously bad idea to expose all of one's major communication options to a ...
  • Uncle Ken: Looks like it is clearing up. Running engines and systems so big and complex sometimes they need some oil somewhere. And as far as wanting a refund fo...
  • San Bruno Persona 2: I very much agree with San Bruno Person. San Bruno Cable TV is ridiculous. I joined for only one year, I can use my fingers to count the times I see...
  • Jason: Quality journalism by reporters like Al Fasoldt is exactly why no tears are being shed as the news/print media dies a slow death....
  • Tyler Leeds: Hooray for Fibe.. Bell has created an internet connection that can exhaust its usage cap in 7hrs if used to potential.. Enjoy that speed for less th...
  • Phillip Dampier: Not sure.... If that is defined as the "Ultra" tier, then it looks like the deadline to sign up is 4/1. All I could find is a graphic from DSL Repor...
  • Ian L: Tried it? Also, will Comcast's 22/5 tier really be going away on 4/1? If so, what will replace it?...
  • Ian L: FiOS sits at 50 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up. They also have a 25 Mbps symmetric tier for $70, which I'd take any day over $100 50/5. Also, DSLExtreme wil...
  • john: if anyone ever gets a call from comcast saying they have gone over the cap and if it happens again they will cut you off all you have say is you cu...
  • Tim: FIOS though probably has a higher upload speed though compared to TW's. All the tiers I have seen look like 50/50, 50/20, 20/20, ect.. TW's upload spe...
  • jr: Another columnist memory holing CEO salaries and pitting consumer against consumer...

Your Account: