Home » Data Caps »Verizon » Currently Reading:

Breaking News: Verizon Comes Out Supporting Internet Overcharging Schemes

Phillip Dampier September 29, 2009 Data Caps, Verizon 5 Comments
Lynch

Lynch

Verizon today joined the chorus of large providers looking for an enhanced payday off the backs of their subscribers when Chief Technology Officer Richard Lynch told a 2009 Fiber to the Home Conference and Expo press conference that the days of unlimited broadband may be coming to a close.

“We’re going to have to consider pricing structures that allow us to sell packages of bytes, and at the end of the day the concept of a flat-rate infinitely expandable service is unachievable,” Lynch said, adding that the broadband industry will see a paradigm shift as the Internet grows and Verizon passes on the cost to “someone.”

This is the first public comment from a Verizon executive that directly supports Internet Overcharging, although Lynch said Verizon was not announcing any pricing changes at this point in time.

Lynch’s statements came in concert with Verizon’s more immediate concerns about Net Neutrality, which the company has spent considerable amounts of money on Washington lobbyists to oppose.

Lynch doesn’t want Net Neutrality to interfere with the potential for the company to offer “premium bandwidth plans.”

Assuming Lynch is speaking about plans sold to consumers, there are no provisions in Net Neutrality legislation that address speed-based Internet service tiers.

Verizon’s statement about metered pricing and Net Neutrality may be a “divide and conquer” strategy to suggest to consumers an “either/or” proposition.  Either accept usage caps and metered service plans or Net Neutrality.  Stop the Cap! has written about this strategy in the past, and it has tripped up some public policy consumer groups in the past who were willing to support one or the other instead of objecting to both.

But Verizon’s near limitless capacity fiber optics FiOS network, and the fact the company’s “cost structure is certainly different, as a tier-one [carrier], [means] their transport costs are a fraction of the smaller operators,” according to Vince Vittore, an analyst with The Yankee Group.  That makes justifying such pricing questionable.

Verizon equates usage pricing models on its wireless mobile network with its wired fiber optic network.  Telephony Online quotes Lynch: “We have already gone this way in wireless because that is where the resource is most constrained.”

Of course, wireless mobile broadband is constrained by limits on the amount of spectrum space available to transport the data, something a fiber optic network need not contend with.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Smith6612
Smith6612
14 years ago

Looks like it is that time to keep an eye on both of my DSL lines now. My usage is already quite high and I see nothing making me slow the usage considering what I use that bandwidth for. So now I have two companies to keep a sharp eye on. Capping FiOS would be the most stupid move Verizon could make, and that will turn me right off when it does come to my area, after all I have been waiting 4-5 years for it now. I have been considering getting their midrange package when it comes around as… Read more »

Greg
Greg
14 years ago

I think “either/or” is the play many of the big broadband providers are going after. The question is whether the FCC is in on the strategy or not. Also, I think Congress has already shown it’s hand when they recently tried to sneak in legislation to strip the FCC of it’s ability to regulate the industry. Net Neutrality could be circumvented with metered plans where websites who have the money could pay to keep their site off the meter. That is, if the Net Neutrality legislation doesn’t cover that type of play. So far, from what I can see, the… Read more »

jr
jr
14 years ago

They want a corporate dictatorship

Tim
Tim
14 years ago

This is what will happen if we go to caps: 1. The industry will try to fit as many people as it can on one pipe in hopes of reaping profit and keeping costs down. 2. In regards to number 1, this will in turn delay any network upgrades to their system since they can ride the cash cow for years to come and be somewhat content that their system won’t be overloaded all the time. 3. When they get to the point where their system starts being overloaded more often, they will implement even more draconian measures to curtail… Read more »

BrionS
Editor
14 years ago
Reply to  Tim

Certainly this is a possibility, but hardly the only outcome. I like to think there are individuals and groups in the United States that are not content to sit around and be perpetually screwed by incumbents in any market. As such, these individuals or groups will form new businesses that provide local and isolated competition for the incumbents. Obviously the business model of these upstarts will need to be significantly different from those of the incumbents or they’ll stand no chance of survival. However, if the incumbents are as overbearing as your above scenario implies customers will be aching to… Read more »

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!