Home » Community Networks »Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

Action Alert! S1004 Moving Again in North Carolina

Jay Ovittore May 26, 2009 Community Networks, Public Policy & Gov't No Comments

North Carolina Legislature Building

I received an e-mail from a very reliable source that told me that S1004 (Level Playing Field Study) will be in the House Public Utilities Committee this Wednesday. Their plan is to refer the study bill to Rules with NO CHANGES. Time Warner Cable and the telecom Lobby want the study bill (S. 1004) to go to Revenue Laws ONLY, and not the Broadband Committee as specified and required in the companion House bill (H. 1252) and advocated by Rep. Faison in the last committee hearing on H 1252.

We must make sure that this bill goes to Broadband Committee as it was publicly voted to do.

I issued this statement to Fiona Morgan from the Independent Weekly this morning on the current developments:

“It has come to my attention from a credible source on the inside that S1004 will be sent to the Revenue Laws Study Committee in the House Public Utilities Committee on Wednesday. It will not go to the Joint Legislative Committee on High Speed Internet in Rural Areas as the Public Utilities Committee had voted to send it to about a month ago. An immense amount of pressure was applied by Time Warner Cable to place S1004 in Revenue Law, as it is a more favorable committee for them to pass this to a full vote. The don’t want a “turf war” on this important issue. They want a free market where they, and only they, are free to monopolize the markets in which they operate. The very definition, from the Revenue Law Study Committee website, of the committee is that “The Committee reviews the State’s revenue laws to determine which laws need clarification, technical amendment, repeal, or other change to make the laws concise, intelligible, easy to administer, and equitable.” This has nothing to do with the State’s revenue laws. It makes sense that it be placed in the Joint Legislative Committee on High Speed Internet in Rural Areas, where the real issues of accessibility, speed and affordability can be addressed. Anything less is a travesty to the citizens to which are legislators are beholden to, and shows that Time Warner and the cable/telecom industry got what they paid for from Sen. Hoyle ($25750 in PAC money) and Rep. Brubaker ($16250 in PAC money).

Municipal broadband is becoming more of a necessity because the current providers refuse to upgrade their infrastructure to technology that is found in this century worldwide. We will continue to fall behind in health care, education and commerce at the speeds at which we move currently. If we want to compete, we must first compete with the high-speeds the rest of the world moves at. Most other developed countries have speeds at least 4 to 5 times the speeds we move at. Japan is at 160Mbps compared to our 10Mbps. South Korea will be at 1Gbps by 2012, 100 times faster. For our state’s very survival, we need someone to step up and upgrade our broadband access and speed. Municipalities are very capable and, more importantly, very willing to provide this step towards the future. All the while, our current providers like to live on their gross profits in the past. “

My first point of contention is that if this is already predetermined, then what is a public committee for anyway. In North Carolina, we did away with back room meetings to decide things of a legislative manner.

My second point is, why is this being sent to Revenue Laws, when clearly it doesn’t even belong there? A committee on Broadband is far more appropriate, if not the only place you could send it! Sen. Hoyle and Rep. Brubaker sit on the Revenue Laws Study Committee, if you catch my drift.

Lastly, North Carolina is 5th highest in unemployment. If we do not give ourselves the tools (and that includes affordable, accessible and up-to-date high speed Internet access), we will continue to head south economically.

Please write the committee members on the House Public Utilities Committee and tell them they should make the Senate concur with the House and send it first to the Broadband Committee and then onto Revenue Laws, the way they originally voted to address this important issue. Tell them we need more accessibility, more affordability and a chance for our state to compete on a global level economically. Let them know that we do not have that right now, due to archaic infrastructure supplied by greedy monopolies and duopolies.

Here are the members’ names and e-mail addresses:

Rep. Lorene Coates <Lorenec@ncleg.net>, Rep. Harold J. Brubaker <Harold.Brubaker@ncleg.net>, Rep. Nelson Cole <Nelsonc@ncleg.net>, Rep. Bill Faison <Billf@ncleg.net>, Rep. Russell E. Tucker <Russell.Tucker@ncleg.net>, Rep. Kelly Alexander <Kellya@ncleg.net>, Rep. Hugh Blackwell <Hugh.Blackwell@ncleg.net>, Rep. Angela Bryant <Angelab@ncleg.net>, Rep. Becky Carney <BeckyC@ncleg.net>, Rep. Beverly M. Earle <Beverly.Earle@ncleg.net>, Rep. Bruce Goforth <Bruceg@ncleg.net>, Rep. W. Robert Grady <Robertg@ncleg.net>, Rep. Jim Gulley <Jim.Gulley@ncleg.net>, Rep. Pricey Harrison <priceyh@ncleg.net>, Rep. Hugh Holliman <Hughh@ncleg.net>, Rep. Julia C. Howard <Julia.Howard@ncleg.net>, Representative Linda Johnson <Lindajo@ncleg.net>, Representative Marvin Lucas <Marvinl@ncleg.net>, Rep. Daniel McComas <Dannym@ncleg.net>, Rep. Tim Moore <Timm@ncleg.net>, Rep. Wil Neumann <Wil.Neumann@ncleg.net>

A sample letter:

Dear Public Utilities Committee Member,

Please make sure that the study activated by SB1004 (The “Level Playing Field” bill) is in fact level and balanced by mandating that the Joint Legislative Committee on High-Speed Internet in Rural Areas also studies broadband issues in North Carolina AND that the study includes an examination of how the public AND private sector are addressing broadband affordability, accessibility and capacity in North Carolina. Right now SB1004 just has Revenue Laws Study Committee studying what is wrong with municipal broadband ownership and no focus on the private sector broadband deficiencies. There is nothing “level” about that!

Please feel free to elaborate on this letter or write your own, but please write today!

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Headlines

Special Report — Who’s Who of Broadband for America: Telecom Industry Connections Exposed

October 2, 2009

Be Sure to Read Part One: Astroturf Overload — Broadband for America = One Giant Industry Front Group for an important introduction to what this super-sized industry front group is all about.
Members of Broadband for America
Red: A company or group actively engaging in anti-consumer lobbying, opposes Net Neutrality, supports Internet Overcharging, belongs to an astroturf [...]

Special Report — Astroturf Overload – Broadband for America = One Giant Industry Front Group

October 2, 2009

Astroturf: One of the underhanded tactics increasingly being used by telecom companies is “Astroturf lobbying” – creating front groups that try to mimic true grassroots, but that are all about corporate money, not citizen power. Astroturf lobbying is hardly a new approach. Senator Lloyd Bentsen is credited with coining the term in the 1980s to [...]

“The Verizon FiOS of Hong Kong”: Fiber to the Home 100Mbps Service $35/Month

September 27, 2009

Hong Kong remains bullish on broadband. Despite the economic downturn, City Telecom continues to invest millions in constructing one of Hong Kong’s largest fiber optic broadband networks, providing fiber to the home connections to residents. City Telecom’s HK Broadband service relies on an all-fiber optic network, and has been dubbed “the Verizon FiOS of [...]

BendBroadband Introduces New Faster Speeds, But Offensive Usage Caps the Skunk at the Broadband Party

September 23, 2009

BendBroadband, a small provider serving central Oregon, breathlessly announced the imminent launch of new higher speed broadband service for its customers after completing an upgrade to DOCSIS 3. Along with the launch announcement came a new logo of a sprinting dog the company attaches its new tagline to: “We’re the local dog. We better be [...]

Shaw Steamrolling Through British Columbia in “Sell To Us Or Die” Strategy

September 23, 2009

Stop the Cap! reader Rick has been educating me about some of the new-found aggression by Shaw Communications, one of western Canada’s largest telecommunications companies, in expanding its business reach across Canada. Woe to those who get in the way.
Novus Entertainment is already familiar with this story. As Stop the Cap! reported previously, Shaw launched [...]

CRTC Embarrassed By FCC Net Neutrality Actions?

September 22, 2009

The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, the Canadian equivalent of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, may be forced to consider American broadband policy before defining Net Neutrality and its role in Canadian broadband, according to an article published today in The Globe & Mail.
[FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski's] proposal – to codify and enforce some general [...]

HissyFitWatch: Shaw & Rogers Non-Compete Agreement Tossed, Allowing Shaw Acquisition of Mountain Cablevision

September 21, 2009

In March 2000, two cable magnates sat down for the cable industry equivalent of My Dinner With Andre. Fine wine, beautiful table linens, an exquisite meal, and a Monopoly board with pieces swapped back and forth representing hundreds of thousands of Canadian consumers. Ted Rogers and Jim Shaw drew a line on the western Ontario [...]

Doubletake: Company With 5GB Limit in Acceptable Use Policy Promises “Near-Unlimited Bandwidth Capacity” to West Virginia

September 11, 2009

Just like FairPoint Communications, the Towering Inferno of phone companies haunting New England, Frontier Communications is making a whole lot of promises to state regulators and consumers, if they’ll only support the deal to transfer ownership of phone service from Verizon to them.
This time, Frontier is issuing a self-serving press release touting their investment of [...]

Sit Down For This: Astroturfing Friends Sold on Pro-Internet Overcharging Report

September 7, 2009

I see it took all of five minutes for George Ou and his friends at Digital Society to be swayed by the tunnel vision myopia of last week’s latest effort to justify Internet Overcharging schemes.
Until recently, I’ve always rationalized my distain for smaller usage caps by ignoring the fact that I’m being subsidized by the [...]

Hotel Guests Rebel Against Internet Overcharging: Consumers Won’t Pay More No Matter Where They Are

September 1, 2009

In 2007, we took our first major trip away from western New York in 20 years and spent two weeks an hour away from Calgary, Alberta.
After two weeks in Kananaskis Country, Banff, Calgary, and other spots all over southern Alberta, we came away with the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly:
The Good

Alberta is like [...]

Court Hands Victory to Comcast: Throws Out 30% Cap On Market Share Inviting Buying Spree At Consumers’ Expense

August 31, 2009

A federal appeals court in Washington has struck down, for a second time, a rulemaking by the Federal Communications Commission to limit the size of the nation’s largest cable operators to 30% of the nation’s pay television marketplace, calling the rule “arbitrary and capricious.”
The 30% rule, designed to keep no single company from controlling more [...]

Broadband Speed — It’s All About Where You Live & What Provider You Live With

August 27, 2009

Less than half of Americans surveyed by PC Magazine report they are very satisfied with the broadband speed delivered by their Internet service provider.
PC Magazine released a comprehensive study this month on speed, provider satisfaction, and consumer opinions about the state of broadband in their community.
The publisher sampled more than 17,000 participants, checking their actual [...]

Stop the Cap!

Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, & Other Internet Overcharging Schemes