Home » Community Networks »Editorial & Site News »Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

Rep. Ty Harrell – Big Cable’s BFF Admits He Found a “Hornet’s Nest” – Gets Stung Anyway

Phillip Dampier May 4, 2009 Community Networks, Editorial & Site News, Public Policy & Gov't 11 Comments
Your ship's captain for a catastrophic anti-consumer cruise sponsored by Time Warner

Your ship's captain for a catastrophic anti-consumer cruise sponsored by Time Warner

Representative Harrell, we honestly cannot understand your surprise over the outrage and backlash that came after you handcrafted, on spec from Time Warner and its lobbying lawyers, an incredibly anti-consumer, anti-competitive, nightmare of a piece of legislation designed to destroy municipal broadband across the state of North Carolina.

Rep. Ty Harrell (D-NC), who normally considers himself a progressive Democrat, has so bumbled his way through this entire affair, he’s managed to end up on the same side as the ultra-big-corporate friendly Americans for Prosperity, which is now war-dialing its way through North Carolina with push polls and fear-monger phone messages.  If that doesn’t sound alarm bells that something isn’t right, what will?  He admits he didn’t realize North Carolina has been through this anti-consumer nonsense before.  In 2007, largely the same bill was bought and paid for by big telecom special interests, but failed to pass after elected officials realized it would antagonize their constituents into voting for anyone but them in the next election.  No kidding.

Harrell said he introduced the legislation, which amazingly channels industry wishes word for word, because ‘Time Warner approached him and asked for it,’ and even worse:

Opponents suggested a study bill, but Harrell says the industry representatives refused to consider it. “Having gone through those battles last time, the proponents of this bill were basically saying, ‘We’ve gone down that road before and we want to have it heard in committee. I said, ‘OK, since my name is on it and you’re in my district.’”

Time Warner evidently has direct access to the Ty Harrell’s Legislation Hotline, because when consumers call asking for protection from sky high rate hikes and municipal broadband competition, the only question from his office apparently is, “how did you get this number?”

Our conservative readers here get it. They know the best way to fight monopolies is to promote competition, which this bill certainly does not. Our progressive readers here get it. They know that an unregulated duopoly of providers (or monopoly in many areas) will deliver the slow service at high prices, so when private companies aren’t interested in delivering, their own community should step up and provide better service.  Your bill trashes the dreams and hopes of both by making competition impractical and monopolies/duopolies a sure thing across the state.

It’s a real shame the only ones that don’t get it are elected officials who do the bidding of big cable and don’t have the wisdom to realize the way to survive this consumer catastrophe is not to be a part of it in the first place.  Perhaps voters will need to remind them.

Contact Information:

Phone:      919-733-5602
Email:     Ty.Harrell@ncleg.net

Rep. Ty Harrell
NC House of Representatives
16 W. Jones Street, Room 2121
Raleigh, NC 27601-1096




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Action Alert: North Carolina Anti-Municipal Broadband Bill Moved to House Utility Committee
  2. A Preview of What’s Coming: They’re Baaaack! Astroturfing “Consumer Group” TWAlex Conveniently Found Advocating His Views…
  3. Call to Action: Push Poll Scam – Hang Up on the Pro-Cable/Telco Poll Calls in North Carolina!
  4. Action Alert: North Carolina, Get Writing Now for Municipal Broadband Protection!
  5. Big Cable Tries to Squash Municipal Competition: Round One

Currently there are 11 comments on this Article:

  1. Rob says:

    Representative Ty Harrell doesn’t sound like a very bright person. I guess money talks. I wonder how much money Time Warner has given his election committee?

  2. techzen says:

    This guy is an idiot, lol.

    I wish you were required to have at least a 140 IQ to be in office.
    Sorry for not being PC and all that, but I tell it how it is.

  3. OHR says:

    Rep. Ty Harrell is a product of the demographics of his home district. He won’t get money from the people, so big business adopts him, instead. Shame.

  4. Ty Harrell says:

    The only thing I have asked you and others to do is trust me. As hard as it may seem, this entire bill has more to it than meets the eye. Hopefully, you’ll hear what happens with the bill tomorrow in the Public Utilities Committee.

    Many thanks for your attention and consideration.

    Best wishes,
    Ty

  5. Funny says:

    1) I doubt that’s Ty Harrell

    2) “There’s more than meets the eye?!” I don’t think so, unless by that you mean “I’m getting some sweet TWC cheese but secretly am hoping this bill doesn’t pass”.

    For SHAME!

  6. [...] the Cap! readers will remember Harrell from this past spring, when he allowed Time Warner Cable to help draft anti-consumer, anti-municipal broadband legislation and introduced it as his own.  It seems [...]

  7. [...] me surprised.  We’ve watched telecommunications companies in North Carolina custom-write legislation and find elected officials more than happy to get such legislation introduced, especially when [...]

  8. [...] advocates to put a stop to legislation custom-written by the cable industry and introduced by a very-compliant state legislator.  When our readers and others called to complain, some found the phone handed off to a cable [...]

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Scott: I was a system administrator for a ISP and know how lucrative they are from running one before all the deregulation that made for a hostile working re...
  • txpatriot: OMG -- isn't this just a repeat of the "havoc" created when families shared a pool of voice minutes? Remember how badly THAT turned out?...
  • txpatriot: Scott, whether such charges amount to "overcharging" is subject to debate, but to say the Chairman "endorsed overcharging" is misleading at best, and ...
  • Scott: I have little sympathy for them when politicians on one hand take the corporations money for their re-election campaigns and in turn push for deregula...
  • Andrew Madigan: I doubt Verizon will expand FiOS just even if the marketing agreement is blocked. However those cities (and any other local government) should have an...
  • Scott: What else would you call charging extra fee's on top of a monthly subscription for usage that's already built-in to the cost of service? Landline b...
  • Andrew: There should be a law against this. This just reeks of corruption! How do they get away with this!? "The chairman’s comments came during an int...
  • txpatriot: Internet "overcharging" schemes? No, that's not a loaded headline at all . . ....
  • Rob: Wow, it could be worse. I'm a Time Warner subscriber. They are a decent ISP. I'm so glad I don't live in the Comcast monopoly....
  • Rob: Of course they have a good reason for usage caps. A usage cap is nothing more than a huge price increase for broadband service. So Crapcast gets to ...
  • Bev: This $20 is not a collections fee. It is nothing more than a rip off to consumers who are behind. They might label it as a collection fee, but if a ca...
  • Barb Goertzen: This is the second time Shaw discontinued CBC in Brooks, AB (where we have no other radio CBC radio reception). In 2009 CRTC suggested Shaw ensure ou...

Your Account: