Home » Broadband "Shortage" »San Antonio, TX »Time Warner » Currently Reading:

Damage Control Technique #1: Increase Speeds in San Antonio

Phillip Dampier April 24, 2009 Broadband "Shortage", San Antonio, TX, Time Warner 13 Comments

[Update 3:20pm EDT: Corey writes back with some minor corrections:  "Standard Service is now 15Mbps down/2Mbps up; Turbo is 25Mbps(ish) down/2.5Mbps up" for him.  Don't forget Powerboost may play with your numbers on the download.]

You’ve just alienated the majority of your customer base with a harebrained scheme to Cap ‘n Tier people into the Internet circa 1990, and that didn’t work and a whole lot of people canceled.  So what do you do to placate the masses?

Increase their speed!

Before: Some of our heavy users (a/k/a Turbo tier customers I’ll bet) are using too much of our service and they are costing us too much.  We need to charge more and cap you to invest in better equipment.

Today: “As a valued (San Antonio) Time Warner Cable customer, we have automatically upgraded your download speed from Road Runner Turbo 10 Mbps to our new Road Runner Turbo 15 Mbps speed at no additional cost to you. More importantly, we’ve upgraded your upload speed from 1 Mbps to 2 Mbps for FREE.”

StoptheCap! reader Corey is confused:

“The ONLY thing that makes sense is that by increasing speeds and usage (especially upload speeds), they are trying to create congestion so that they get problems and complaints to base their “facts” on, so that they have ammunition to come back with at a later time.”

It could be that.  Or it could also be the fact the exaflood theory they based their earlier arguments on doesn’t hold a cup of water.  It does seem odd that they would increase speeds for the customers they claim were causing a lot of their “problems.”  Perhaps they also lost a whole bunch of those customers over this Cap ‘n Tier business and they want to get them back.

Currently there are 13 comments on this Article:

  1. Sunflower says:

    Huh. I wonder why San Antonio gets this and Austin doesn’t? We’re only an hour away from SA..

    So, they get faster speeds, and we get cut off in a TWC ‘hissyfit?’ Gee, that’s just great.

  2. Craig says:

    I can not understand these moves, it does not make any sense its a 180 degree turn from there original “people use to much bandwidth” theory for tiered pricing.
    Its pants on head retarded, now if they ever bring up the tiered pricing plan again wont they assume people are going to point that stuff like this and go “What the HELL!?”
    The only reason I can see them doing this is that they are actually hemorrhaging subscribers and need a way to keep there big $ customers. It just does not make any kind of sense . . .

    Double You Tea Eff Time Warner

  3. Alkaline says:

    Oh Nohs!!!! The Internets are going to run out now for sure!

  4. A Horse says:

    TWC to San Antonio: “Hey sweetie… sorry I gave you a black eye… here’s some flowers to make it all better”

    We will not stay in this abusive broadband marriage, Time Warner. The day we get divorced is coming up very soon.

  5. Corey Williams says:

    Thank you for bringing attention to this sillyness <(sp?meh) anyhoo.. The speeds mentioned were for regular subscribers 10-15 and 1-2 for upload.. turbo has gone to 25mbps(ish)down and 2 1/2(ish) up..which brings us back to (what the heck??) The contradictions in logic simply astound me.. i pay around $55 for those (turbo speeds now) but actual download speeds (files) have never gone over 1.5 mbps ever.. Speedtest.net gets those speeds but not any actual files..

    Also i know a few time warner people from san antonio and have sum rackspace and dell freinds too (sup austin) and the general consensus is this is a time warner corporate deal… (I would like to re-iterate to be especially nice to employees as this is not their fault..)

    Bottom line.. I keep trying to come up with theories as to why they would do this.. but it comes down to TOTAL BS!

    The “inside” people i have talked to say they could actually almost double the speeds we get now up and down WITHOUT any new equipment and at NO cost to them.. and that they are “holding back” and only bumping up the speeds as a sort of “wow look what we did for you…for FREE!” To ME they are just WAKE UP calls! LOOK we caught you in ANOTHER LIE.. I mean it really does NOT make sense… “we need to control our networks and cap and charge you more…BUT here is MORE bandwith that we say we can’t give you…” Sorry bout the rant.. ;-) but YOU guys “get” it. thnx

  6. tacitus says:

    I live in Austin and I haven’t seen much of a speed increase, but I did hit 9Mbps for the first time last week, so the bandwidth is still creeping up.

    The only thing that makes sense to me for the bandwidth increases is the TW is wanting customers to grow accustomed to the higher speeds so that they will not want to go to lower speed services when they finally put in those caps. Bait and switch.

    Personally, I has all the (download) bandwidth I needed 8Mbps — and I am a heavy user compared to most. When you can already download an hour’s worth of video in 10 minutes, there really isn’t much need for more, and I suspect about 98% of all users feel the same way.

    That’s TW’s problem — the higher bandwidth tiers don’t make a lot of sense to the vast majority of people, so there is little incentive to upgrade. Hence they want caps to expand their revenue stream.

  7. tacitus says:

    “I has?” Speak English!!! :)

  8. Corey Williams says:

    I agree.. at this time we don’t really need more speed.. we just don’t need a “limit” on how much we can use it.. when it does not really make sense..

  9. I am still working on getting a better comment system in place here for people to edit their remarks.

  10. PL says:

    Getting 15M/384k here in Rochester on the standard plan… first noticed it Tuesday afternoon

    • Mazakman says:

      You are seeing Powerboost on the standard service. This is why you are getting 15M down.

  11. jr says:

    I would like to see:

    1. TWC implement a cap closer to the Comcast model of 250 GB/month, if they truly need to upgrade equipment and catch the heavy users among us.

    2. If a user goes under the 250 GB/month, have a “rollover” policy, say up to 10% (25 GB) that can be banked for a limited time.

    OR

    3. Let this cap policy die a quiet death, let me monitor my web usage and submit to me what they measured I used and give me ample warning, and truly clamp down on the heavy users.

    One day, hopefully, we’re more saturated like S. Korea, Japan, Finland. . .until then, think and implement reasonable policies.

    jr
    San Antonio TWC user

  12. William says:

    Is this speed increase confirmed? Where was it posted, an email to all customers? satx.rr.com website as buggy as it may be makes no mention.

    I have reset my ip and modem and still at the same speeds.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Rasputin1357: Why can't we bring back tar and feathering? This jackass looks to be the perfect candidate for that treatment!...
  • Terry: This makes it look as if you don't understand business. The content producer sets their asking price. The delivery provider negotiates the price to wh...
  • Dave Hancock: Phillip, one thing that you said peaked my interest: "Subscribers on Time Warner Cable’s blog keep coming up with an innovative idea to solve thes...
  • Jason!: Am I surprised? No, I am not surprised....
  • jr: CEOs need to make 8 figures...
  • DM: I hate hearing statements like this because this has been the cable industry’s exact attitude for the past five years. Regarding internet services,...
  • Jeremy: That's their whole plan so they can justify ripping off consumers with lousy bandwidth and caps....
  • Uncle Ken: Just great/ If what Kent says is true we will drop to the bottom of the rest of the earth and be back on dial up all in the name of stock holders. M...
  • Earl Cooley III: They should pay the various channels whatever fees they want, and finance it by dramatically slashing executive compensation, using the extra money le...
  • Phillip Dampier: In other words, some automated test procedure is being run on a periodic basis that resets your line speeds lower (how many have ever gotten faster sp...
  • Zaii: I've been having this issue for months now. I had 1792 d/l for years rock solid connection then I got "optimized" to 1504. Contacted Verizon direc...
  • Phillip Dampier: In Australia or New Zealand, where flat rate broadband was around only very briefly back when "online streaming" meant a low bitrate Real Audio stream...

Your Account: