Home » Austin, TX »Editorial & Site News »San Antonio, TX »Time Warner » Currently Reading:

Texas Internet Rationing “Delayed” = Consumer Victory? Hardly

Phillip Dampier April 14, 2009 Austin, TX, Editorial & Site News, San Antonio, TX, Time Warner 19 Comments

I have been getting news tips {thanks Carsten, J, and others) about newspapers in Texas reporting that the Texas Internet Rationing Plan from Time Warner has been “postponed” until October, and this represents some sort of consumer victory.

Hardly.

texas-flagFirst, this is not exactly breaking news.  Landel Hobbs, Time Warner’s COO, already made mention the cap plan would begin implementation in Austin and San Antonio in October, presumably with a trial period.  It sounds like Mr. Hobbs, bless his heart, already knew about the “consumer victory” that comes “as a result of complaints” before the Time Warner folks on the ground down in Texas knew, because they only started speaking about it this week.

Trials will begin in Rochester, N.Y., and Greensboro, N.C., in August. We will apply what we learn from these two markets when we launch trials in San Antonio and Austin, Texas, in October, but we will guarantee at least the same level of usage capacity in these trials.

Now, actual billing starts in January, up until they change their minds again.

A trial program intended to charge varying rates depending on usage was slated to begin this summer. The decision to delay the meter program was prompted mostly by customer reaction, said Gavino Ramos, Time Warner’s vice president of communication for South Texas.

“What happened as we’re continuing to listen was we worked in some of the comments and ideas that got sent to us,” Ramos said. “We came to the realization, let’s do this in October.”

Meanwhile, Rochester is the big “lucky winner,” joining Greensboro in starting the Internet Rationing Plan in August.  I suppose it was inevitable our two cities come closer together, considering a whole lot of people exiting Rochester end up moving to North Carolina.  Sooner is better in cities with fewer competitive choices anyway.

If Time Warner was truly responsive to its customers, it would drop this Titanic-like disaster of a rationing plan today.

There is no consumer victory here, and this company is still not listening.  Instead, by putting off the abuse for a few months, they hope you will fall complacent and not continue to engage in a united effort to resist unwarranted capping of your Internet access.  The first step of coping with an abusive relationship with your Internet provider is recognizing you are in one.  Being told you are not going to get hit with punitive caps today, but in a few months, doesn’t change that.  Don’t be a victim.

Currently there are 19 comments on this Article:

  1. Sunshine1970 says:

    Waait a minute…Hobbs had said that the trials in Austin & San Antonio will be delayed because they wanted to see how well it does in Rochester & Greensboro first and will apply what they learn, NOT due to customer comme–erm complaints

    I’m kind of happy we’re being delayed, but I’d much rather see them say –nevermind– about the trials instead.

  2. George says:

    I called to cancel my Time Warner service today. The rep was definitely reading off a script and tried to insinuate that AT&T was already capping in Austin. “AT&T has been capping since October of ’08. I bet you didn’t realize that.”

    I told her I was aware that they are experimenting with caps in some areas but have not announced any plans in my area so for now AT&T will get my business as long as they don’t implement caps. If they do I will weigh all my options again at that time but as TW’s currently announced plans are insulting I will not consider coming back to them unless they announce they’ve completely changed course.

    “Caps will end up coming to every provider eventually.”

    To which I replied “not if customers revolt. If the only option is unreasonable caps I will figure out a way to get by with no internet connection at home. ”

    I also told her I may just be a drop in the bucket, but if enough drops accumulate we may be able to reverse the anti-consumer tide before it drowns us all.

    • Josh Beck says:

      In that event, in Texas, I’d direct the consumer representative the Grande Communication homepage. They are running a banner that states they will not cap bandwidth.

      Question to stopthecap readers:

      Should 1:
      -Cancel my Time Warner service now.

      -Wait a while longer and cancel once they
      make a decision?

      • Sunflower says:

        For the moment, I’m waiting. I’m probably moving out of my apartment complex at the end of July, so I’ll be able to look for either a house or another complex and will be able to weigh my options then.

        • George says:

          My lease is up in my apartment complex around the same time and I was considering waiting until then, but their recent statements in conjunction with a recent customer service debacle forced me into the arms of AT&T. And I try to avoid AT&T.

        • George says:

          Also, another argument for canceling as opposed to say when the caps take effect: with the public statements coming out from Time Warner thus far, do you really want to continue giving them money while you hope they change their mind?

          If a person announces to me that they’re going to do something deplorable I don’t wait until shortly before they do it to stop being friendly towards them. I do what I can to try and persuade them otherwise, make a report to the proper authorities if warranted, and sever all ties with that person.

          At this time, Time Warner does not deserve my $46.60 x 6-8 months, until their deplorable tiers kick in.

          I think the time when voting with your dollars makes the most difference is now. I also think it’s one of the reasons they’ve announced it as far in advance as they have, to truly gauge how their subscribers react.

          It’s time to react.

    • Dion says:

      I told Time Warner the same thing myself. If ATT sees they are getting more and more customers becuase they dont have caps then it should make them stop and think about it… also remember ATT is not as dependent on the video end like TWC is, I am guessing they might be willing to leave the cap off and take a small hit in Video if they are making it up in other areas.

      TWC modle is just dated, they have to learn how to get into the 21st Centery and know that they cant depended on Cable for all their profits because even if they do this… you can bet companys like Microsoft, Hulu, Netflix, and Apple will figure out a way to get us their products. All they are going to end up doing is cause one of these companys to start up their own ISP network I think or find them selves in court in the long run.

      That is just my thoughts.

  3. George says:

    I think the small amount of back pedaling they’re doing is a direct result of the cancellations they’ve received. If more pour in and keep pouring in I believe it will make a difference. The more business they lose and the more AT&T gains because of the announced caps, the more likely both companies will rethink their strategies.

    She actually brought up Grande as “the only carrier who doesn’t cap… yet.” She also was glib enough to mention “but since you’re in an apartment complex we service I doubt they’re an option for you.”

  4. James Lang says:

    I still say we all should set date to where we all flood TWC to cancel all tides with them all at once. Now for this to work we all must be united and drive TWC to chapter 11 and demand the government not to bail them out.

  5. Dion says:

    I think they pushed this back because of the Mayor Race going on in Austin and they did not want this as part of their stump speech. Last think they need is for local politics to make it a flash point.

    Please, make sure everyone in Austin email the people running for Mayor about what is going on with TWC and let them know this is important to you. If they see this as a easy way to votes… we will see action.

  6. James Lang says:

    Good point Dion if anyone knows how to contact them please give me a holler
    and I will put that information on my website for people to contact them.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Uncle Ken: Best part of this story is one company letting another piggyback on their working cable till it was sorted out. Shows people still do care. Brings o...
  • tresho: "They would normally be able to assign you a “broadband phone number” instantly." That's what I was expecting. What got to me was their insertio...
  • Phillip Dampier: That activation message telling you to wait a few days is ridiculous, but it is probably there because Virgin Mobile suffered a huge national outage l...
  • Phillip Dampier: When you first activate, you are stuck on their much slower 1xRTT connection, which can be painfully slow. I didn't experience any of these issues ...
  • Phillip Dampier: The Road Runner national help desk is run by a third party company, although I'm not sure that's who you ended up talking with. The agreement says fe...
  • Bill: Phillip writes regarding ESPN3 that: " [...] it also means Road Runner customers who don’t take cable-TV will not have access." This is the way I also...
  • Tim: These Networks are biting off more than they can chew. More and more people are going to drop cable if this keeps happening, which it will. Once that ...
  • agent00kevin: My experience: I bought a Mifi 2200 at WalMart this afternoon + the 40$ card needed for unlimited service. Got everything home, booted up the lapt...
  • tresho: The previous commenters apparently were able to activate their Virgin Mobile service. I wasn't. I bought a MC760 at my local Walmart on Friday after...
  • Will: Thanks for answering my questions. I do have a bit of engineering knowledge on how CDMA 3G EVDO works so your post has answered my questions. So basic...
  • Ron Paul FTW: Sorry... The link to The Creature from Jekyll Island speech was wrong... Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zus8_xl8qUI Find a...
  • Paul: Virgin Mobile's broadband data is obviously being routed differently than Sprint users' data. Sprint is clearly providing less resources to Virgin Mob...

Your Account: