Home » Public Policy & Gov't » Currently Reading:

BREAKING NEWS: Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) To Introduce The Massa Broadband Internet Fairness Act

Phillip Dampier April 10, 2009 Public Policy & Gov't 25 Comments

Congressman Eric Massa to introduce legislation designed to prevent Job Killing Broadband Internet Caps; Freshman Congressman will fight to prevent high priced burden on families

Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY)

Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY)

CORNING, NY – Today Congressman Eric Massa (D-NY) announced officially that he is drafting legislation designed to prevent job killing broadband internet downloading caps. The Massa Broadband Internet Fairness Act would prohibit unfair tiered price structures from internet providers. The bill will also address the importance of helping broadband providers create jobs and increase their bandwidth while increasing competition in areas currently served by only one provider.

“I am taking a leadership position on this issue because of all the phone calls, emails and faxes I’ve received from my district and all over the country,” said Congressman Eric Massa. “Time Warner has announced an ill-conceived plan to charge residential and business broadband fees based on the amount of data they download. They have yet to explain how increased internet usage increases their costs.”

Regarding Time Warner’s 4/9/09 statement, Rep. Massa had this to say:

“Time Warner’s decision has the potential to more than triple customers’ current rates and I think most families will find this to be too taxing to afford. Time Warner believes they can do this in Rochester NY, Greensboro NC, Austin TX and San Antonio TX, and it’s almost certainly just a matter of time before they attempt to overcharge all of their customers. And while I favor a business’s right to maximize their profit potential, I believe safeguards must be put in place when a business has a monopoly on a specific region.”

“At a time when millions of Americans have lost their jobs and businesses are struggling, I am compelled to fight against additional, unnecessary burdens placed on my constituents.”

In the past week, there has been a significant uproar in the Rochester, NY area regarding Time Warner’s announcement that they will “test market” a plan to charge customers based on how much they download. The initial proposal was to introduce a 5, 10, 20, or 40 gb/month downloading cap. If customers went over the cap, they would start mounting additional fees.

Then today Time Warner announced a new tiered plan similar to the previous one. However, for a consumer to receive the same unlimited internet that they currently do for around $40 per month, they would be billed $150 per month under the new plan.

In addition to this excessive and disproportionate charge, as internet usage increases by an average of 50% per year, companies setting caps sets a horrible, long-term, precedent. At a time when Americans need to utilize all available assets to improve the economy, limiting internet usage, which this plan would do, handicaps our ability to compete on the global stage. Furthermore, it will have significant stifling effects on start ups and small businesses.

This would also have significant impacts on the agricultural, medical, and educational communities. Farmers are increasingly dependent upon constant exchanges of GPS information to control all aspects of their operations. Medical professionals are increasing their data transfer rates, and patients rely on their ability to continue doing so unimpeded. Finally, educational institutions use more bandwidth every year. In Western New York, students at RIT’s School for the Deaf, who use video transfer software to communicate, would be greatly disadvantaged by Time Warner’s proposal.

As soon as the drafting of the Broadband Internet Fairness Act is completed, it will become available.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rob
Rob
15 years ago

Excellent. We need some resources that gives everyone their Congress critter so we can pressure them to support this.

Keep the pressure up folks!

T.M.
T.M.
15 years ago

I wonder if this will include a fair access clause or “net neutrality” clauses.

TW OH Customer
TW OH Customer
15 years ago

Its great to see political figures involved in regulation of what has become an essential utility in any American home.
Cable was originally subsidized by Uncle Sam and should be billed like sewage is, a fixed recurring monthly charge that only increases when maintenance is needed and goes back down to its original price when maintenance is paid for.

JL
JL
15 years ago

I think he’s missing the point a lot.

We need competition for broadband, no more monopolies like Time Warner has. We need to let Time Warner try this business model in a competitive environment and allow them to go out of business. They don’t deserve to stay in business.

Scott Cranfill
15 years ago
Reply to  JL

JL, the problem is that there is no good competition in the trial markets. Time Warner is only trialing this in areas where they own the vast majority of the market and competition is week.

JL
JL
15 years ago
Reply to  Scott Cranfill

Exactly… we need to promote competition. Outlawing their business model will still allow Time Warner to have a monopoly and customers will still be under served and over charged.

We need to allow Time Warner to use this business model so that they can lose revenue and eventually go out of business which will allow more intelligent companies to take over.

We need Congressman Massa to outlaw these types of monopolies like Time Warner has.

Scott Cranfill
15 years ago
Reply to  JL

But how do you propose we promote competition? Verizon will not come in when Frontier is already here.

What other options are there?

When these companies are given exclusive franchises, it’s not a “free market”, and thus the typical competition-lowers-prices process does not pan out.

Jeffrey_Bays
Jeffrey_Bays
15 years ago
Reply to  Scott Cranfill

As long as Earthlink or AOL are not capped (even though they are on the TW cable line), the test might be considered valid. They will see that people that want to pay less, will. They can then say that 90% of their customers did not want to pay less and moved to a “competitor”.

Our bad. Aparently 90% of our customers did not want to pay less in ex change for a useless high speed connection.

BTW I can’t wait for their higher speed package. i can blow my cap in hours instead of days!

Scott
Scott
15 years ago
Reply to  Jeffrey_Bays

Earthlink apparently IS Time Warner Cable and vice versa, even though Earthlink’s customer service reps are all in Asia and/or India. So they will be capping. Don’t know anything about AOL.

Larry
Larry
15 years ago
Reply to  JL

Time Warner will not try this in a market that includes FIOS or another competitive cable company. I would love to see them try this in a FIOS market.

Because they will not try this so called test in a competitive market, the results are going to be a bit tainted. If they really wanted accurate real world results they also need to test this in competitive markets also. It definitely would not be fair if they capped less competitive markets while not capping in the competitive markets.

Sunflower
Sunflower
15 years ago

Awesome! I hope this gets results. Go Rep Massa!

Stephen Switzer
15 years ago

THANK YOU Massa!!!

TW OH Customer
TW OH Customer
15 years ago

Please sign the petition to stop TWC from setting their caps.
https://secure.freepress.net/site/Advocacycmd=display&page=UserAction&id=311

Jeffrey_Bays
Jeffrey_Bays
15 years ago
Reply to  TW OH Customer

unknown servlet requested… maybe a bad link?

Joe
Joe
15 years ago

I’m very glad to see Rep. Massa putting some of his words into action and if nothing else he has went a long way in proving his innocence – politicians are guilty until proven innocent. But we have to remember that this legislation has a long way to go – it still needs to pass the point where TWC starts offering the politicians $ to vote against the people. The only way to trump TWC’s $ is to create such an uproar that the politicians will value the increased votes (or potential loss of votes by voting against it) more… Read more »

Steve
Steve
15 years ago

I’m usually not a fan of government getting involved, but if there was ever a case of a Monopoly abusing its customers, or a clear anti-trust violation (against any service like Netflix, Hulu and other competiton that depend on TW internet), then this is IT. If this was a great idea, one that was necessary or fair, it would be system-wide. The fact that it isn’t PROVES that it is simply a plan to gouge the eyes out of a defenseless market base. Remember any time you read these stories: Japan has 100MB speed service at about $20, NO CAPS.… Read more »

Ken
Ken
15 years ago

How thick headed must the people in Time Warner be??? With all the public outrage, bad press, and even government starting to act, why don’t they just withdraw this stupid, stupid plan???

Diane
Diane
15 years ago

Petition Link again for those who missed it
http://www.petitiononline.com/twcfedup/petition.html

Lee Drake
15 years ago

Please continue your efforts and let us know how we can help. Also do your best to lower the cost of competition entering the area by supporting the installation of FiOS and WIMAX technologies (NOT Clearwire, they’re just another TWC Tool).

Jon Stark
Jon Stark
15 years ago

Keep up the voice of reason so that everyone can hear the outrageous conduct of Time Warner! Fully support this website and its cause.

Mike
Mike
15 years ago

If Richard Burr and Kay Hagan don’t do something, I will vote against them. It doesn’t matter who’s running against them in 2010 or 2012, I will vote for NOT RB or KH. Same for Yvonne Johnson… such a useless mayor we have in Greensboro (and city council). Damn it.

Bryan
Bryan
15 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Have you contacted their office? If enough constituents complain to him he will take action.

JamesM
JamesM
15 years ago

Thank you for leading the charge and exposing TWC for this Rep. Massa with your statement of 4/9! I agree that TWC has not in fact adequately explained why such a _drastic change_ in how they price their broadband Internet service is necessary, given their largely fixed costs, and not variable costs as Mr. Hobbs claims.

I wholeheartedly endorse your efforts on this matter, both on principle and due to the fact it could affect me where I live as well if TWC attempts to take this “master plan” nationwide.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!