Home » Comcast/Xfinity »Competition »Public Policy & Gov't »USI Wireless »Video » Currently Reading:

Comcast Bans Twin Cities Wi-Fi Upstart’s Ads After Pointing Out Comcast CEO’s Salary on Billboards

Phillip Dampier December 2, 2010 Comcast/Xfinity, Competition, Public Policy & Gov't, USI Wireless, Video 5 Comments

USI Wireless' TV Ad was rejected by Comcast

“Our competitor’s CEO made $27 million last year. Ever wonder why you pay so much for Internet?”

That question is posed on an enormous billboard over downtown Minneapolis.  It comes courtesy of US Internet of Minnetonka, a tiny wireless provider competing against Comcast in Minneapolis.  The Wi-Fi upstart has taken center stage in another dispute with Comcast that threatens to have national implications.

For US Internet, the cable giant is already big enough to throw its weight around, because the Wi-Fi competitor has been notified it is not going to get its television ads seen by Comcast subscribers.

That struck Joe Caldwell, CEO of USI Wireless, as anti-competitive.

“I spent thousands of dollars to get this ad produced, and now Comcast won’t run it,” Caldwell told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. “I think maybe they’re mad at me because I said the CEO of Comcast made too much money.”

Although Caldwell’s billboard only names Comcast in fine print, barely visible from Minneapolis streets, his company’s door-hangers are more direct:

“We at USI Wireless would like to congratulate Qwest & Comcast for both having sports arenas named after them. Ever wonder why you pay so much for Internet?”

Comcast told Caldwell it could not run his ads because they are a competitor.

USI Wireless charges $14.95 a month for wireless access across the city.  Comcast charges between $40-115 for its standalone broadband service.

It’s not the first ad controversy for USI, which irritated some residents back in May with some edgy billboards featuring a woman some described as a prostitute next to big, bold print: “Fast, Cheap, and Satisfaction Guaranteed.”

USI got into some controversy with its earlier billboards, which raised more than a few eyebrows.

Caldwell’s television ad features Fancy Ray McCloney, head of Minneapolis-based ad agency Chocolate Orchid Productions, as its pitchman, loudly asking, “Why pay $30 to $60 a month when you can get the same quality service for as low as $14.95?”

McCloney adds salt to USI’s wounded bank account because, as he tells it, it was Comcast that invited him to produce the ad and get it running on the system.  McCloney claims a Comcast advertising representative contacted him after seeing the billboard and invited USI to buy TV advertising.

“They saw the billboards, and they asked if they could get some of that advertising business on Comcast cable,” McCloney told the Star-Tribune.

After Caldwell spent $7,500 producing the TV ad, Comcast now says it cannot run on their system.

A local Comcast spokesperson told the newspaper he didn’t know if McCloney’s story was true or not.  A national spokesperson for the cable company said Comcast decides on a case-by-case basis whether to take advertising for services that compete with Comcast.

The dispute threatens to have national implications as Comcast pushes to have its merger with NBC-Universal approved.

With ownership of additional broadcast outlets, would-be competitors to Comcast could find themselves banned from advertising on broadcast stations with ties to the cable operator.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/USI Wireless Ad.flv[/flv]

USI Wireless’ “banned” TV ad, which makes no mention of Comcast by name, or the current controversy.  (1 minute)

Currently there are 5 comments on this Article:

  1. Lexster says:

    Oh, right…because I don’t see ads for satellite TV services on my cable. They’re totally not competition. Comcast is just sore because they were called out for their CEO getting paid a ridiculous amount of money.

    And I would like to add that I would totally get USI from that commercial alone were I in Minneapolis.

    • In a competitive market, I don’t think the government should get involved in these ad decisions. But when a company amasses the market power of Comcast, there is little alternative.

      And I would not take service on USIW. They are much cheaper for a reason, their services are slow at best. And never reliable.

      • Scott says:

        I would agree as well if we actually had a competitive market. As long as the government continues to rubber stamp massive corporate mergers allowing these companies to dominate the markets in virtual monopolies, we’re going to end up relying on the same government to eventually regulate and police those very same companies.

  2. Paul says:

    Comcast uses its dominance in one arena (cable TV) to prevent competition in another (home internet). That is the very definition of anti-competitive behavior.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Paul Houle: It is strange. Even before 4G hit the streets the people who made 3G were already thinking about 5G. Phone makers, carriers, and customers sure we...
  • Guiltinan: This is just awful. I am going to need info on this email and emails. I appreciate this. Thanks for letting me know....
  • Daryl C: So, I jumped on this to get the previous Live a Little channel pkg, showtime and HBO grandfathered in. I've had no issues with the streaming or pictu...
  • Joan McBride: Switched to Spectrum in June of 2017 because my phone, internet and cable was running me about $177.00 a month. Salesman actually came to the house w...
  • Eddie: Intuitive inventions offers a new antenna does this work as advertised?...
  • Rich: I went to cancel DirectTV now because of the price increase and they offered me $10 off for the next three months LOL......
  • John: I have been with Time Warner since the 1980's and since Charter Spectrum took over here in upstate NY my internet only minimum speed bill went from 29...
  • Ty: Hmm... I've gotten an email from AT&T trying to get me to switch to the new plans but haven't received any notification of price increases....
  • Daniel Baxter: I'm more the pest to these scammers because along with writing about it here i am also reporting these ads to relevant authorities. I live in a secon...
  • spectrum sucks: So glad to finally cancel my Spectrum. Them dropping Max and Epix with no decrease in price/compensation was the last straw. See ya later TWC...
  • Phillip Dampier: They can turn off any services that you are being billed separately for....
  • Josh: That is beyond ridiculous. Wow. Luckily it doesn’t matter in the slightest since so-called 5g is pointless and currently near unusable....

Your Account: