" /> Sen. Al Franken vs. Time Warner Cable/Comcast Merger | Stop the Cap!

Home » Audio »Comcast/Xfinity »Competition »Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't »Time Warner Cable »Video » Currently Reading:

Sen. Al Franken vs. Time Warner Cable/Comcast Merger

Phillip Dampier February 26, 2014 Audio, Comcast/Xfinity, Competition, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Time Warner Cable, Video 1 Comment
Franken

Franken

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) has turned over much of his campaign website to expressing concern about the merger of Time Warner Cable and Comcast.

Franken has maintained a comparatively low profile since arriving in the U.S. Senate and rarely grants interviews to reporters outside of Minnesota, but after the announced $45 billion merger deal between the two largest cable companies in the country, he started making exceptions.

Franken has repeatedly tangled with Comcast, the dominant cable operator in his home state, since being elected. He favors Net Neutrality/Open Internet policies, strongly opposed Comcast’s purchase of NBCUniversal, and believes cable rates are too high and service quality is too low.

Although the senator claims he remains undecided about the merger, his public comments suggest he is likely going to oppose the deal.

“We need more competition, not less,” said Franken, who mocked Comcast’s claim that the two cable companies never compete with each other. “This is going exactly in the wrong direction. Consumers, I am very concerned, are going to pay higher bills and get even worse service and less choice.”

Although the merger will leave the combined company serving nearly one in three households, Comcast says it plans to keep its total nationwide broadband market share under 30%. But Franken points out Comcast isn’t just a cable company. It also owns a major television network and has ownership interests in nearly three dozen cable networks and television stations around the country — many in America’s largest cities.

Franken mass e-mailed his campaign supporters to express concern about the current state of the cable and broadband business and asked consumers what they thought about their cable company. More than 60,000 have shared their mostly negative views so far.

Minnesota Public Radio takes a closer look at why Sen. Al Franken is interested in the merger of Time Warner Cable and Comcast. Feb. 24, 2014 (4:32)
You must remain on this page to hear the clip, or you can download the clip and listen later.

competitionThat may prove to be smart politics for Franken, seen as a polarizing figure in the left-right divide. The near-universal loathing among consumers for both Comcast and Time Warner Cable threaten to rise above traditional partisan politics. Republican lawmakers have kept largely quiet about the merger deal, and some are even openly questioning it. Franken may tapped into a re-election issue that voters across Minnesota are likely to support — especially older Republican-leaning independents.

Franken claims his survey is trying to level the playing field by getting consumers involved in the issue. For Washington regulators accustomed to only hearing from company lobbyists and various third party groups often financially tied to merger advocates, it could be a game-changer.

Comcast’s connections in Washington are legendary. Former Republican FCC commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker wasted no time taking a job as a senior Comcast lobbyist shortly after voting in favor of Comcast’s buyout of NBCUniversal. Former Republican FCC chairman Michael Powell today heads the National Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCTA), the cable industry’s largest lobbying group and supporter of the merger.

The merger deal’s regulatory review will be conducted by current FCC chairman Thomas Wheeler, a past president of the NCTA and former cable and wireless industry lobbyist. Bill Baer is in charge of the Antitrust Division that will examine the merger at the U.S. Department of Justice. His last job was leading the law firm that represented NBC in support of the Comcast-NBCUniversal merger.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/CNN Al Franken Talks With CNN About TWC-Comcast Merger 2-13-14.flv

Sen. Al Franken spoke to CNN’s Jake Tapper earlier this month about the Time Warner Cable-Comcast merger. Tapper admitted he dropped Comcast because he was dissatisfied with their service. (7:45)

Share

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. Paul Houle says:

    The real issue here isn’t this particular merger, it’s that things have gone too far.

    The U.S. needs a broadband strategy that is proactive rather than reactive. The key thing is to make competitive what can be competitive while regulating the parts that can’t be competitive.

    Competition in the last mile is a chimera. Despite a few pockets of overbuilding, such as Austin, TX, it doesn’t make sense to build cable or fiber infrastructure if it already exists.

    As in the UK, multiple providers should compete to provide internet and video services over the last mile infrastructure. The “middle mile” is already overbuilt in most areas, and if customers had a choice about who ran their “middle mile” infrastructure, customers could solve problems like the Verizon-Netflix congestion with their feet. Video should be something you can buy from multiple providers the same way you could buy long distance from multiple providers after the break-up of AT&T.

    We really ought to have a national plan to tear up the old copper and coax infrastructure and replace it all with fiber. The cost is an excuse. Sure, it would cost $3000 to hook up my rural house with fiber. That’s just half what I pay in property taxes in a year and the infrastructure will last 50 years, so it’s 1% of my local taxes in the long term.







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Diana Allen: Windstream is a POS and they don't give a crap about their customers because they know we don't have another choice up here in the mountains. Believe ...
  • Tahseen Chowdhury: I tried the twitter method with Facebook. I use MagicJack for phone service and I pay 30 dollars a year. I use Netflix and an Antenna to watch local n...
  • Scott: This merger would be a huge waste of money, there's no way they can leverage DirectTV to effectively bundle and compete with the Cable CO's or Fiber t...
  • Paul Houle: Maybe someday people in Washington are going to wake up to how mad Americans are about broadband disinvestment...
  • A,: If this happened, it would solve the network neutrality issue. Every town that was getting throttled would get a municipal ISP, and they wouldn't t...
  • digitlman: I would say that they are all clueless, but as you said, it is more like they are being paid by Big Telecom to oppose NN....
  • BobInIllinois: Funny that AT&T thinks that they can bundle their service with DirecTV. In Illinois, AT&T's hardwire phone areas are mostly in large popu...
  • Adam Reese: Still being overcharged out the ass, but at least it stings a little less. Hopefully they don't raise our prices over time....
  • Scott: The FCC is not nor has it ever been a consumer protection agency in anything, even policy matters, nor can I remember any point where they've stepped ...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Phil, Moore + Metcalfe + Butter gets one better than 60% cost compression. So by waiting ~15 months that's how they got the bill down! It really ha...
  • txpatriot: I messed up. see above....
  • txpatriot: Now it's my turn to admit I misunderstood you. My bad.. You said equal access benefited wireless and cable, not that it APPLIED to wireless and cab...

Your Account: