Home » Competition »Consumer News »Google Fiber & Wireless » Currently Reading:

Google Fiber’s $300 Install Fee Meets Resistance from Landlords; Renters May Be Left Out

Phillip Dampier July 9, 2013 Competition, Consumer News, Google Fiber & Wireless 5 Comments

google fiberGoogle Fiber may not be coming to a Kansas City apartment complex near you.

The coveted gigabit fiber to the home service is drawing criticism from owners of multi-dwelling units, condos, and apartment buildings because of its installation fee.

Google requires property owners to either go all-in or forget about getting the service. That means $300 for each apartment or condo, regardless of whether it is occupied or if an existing tenant wants the service or not.

Landlords tell the Kansas City Star the installation fee is just too much, especially when considering the phone and cable company wired their buildings for free. The newspaper notes that a 350-unit apartment complex opting in to Google Fiber will have to pay more than $100,000 upfront just to get the service.

Those living in one of nine CRES Management apartment complexes suspect they won’t be getting Google Fiber now or in the future — the property owners balked at an installation fee for their properties well into the six figures.

cres“I don’t know many apartment complexes that have $100,000 in the bank just waiting to be spent,” said Jon Gambill, CRES Management information technology director.

Google doesn’t offer volume discounts for multi-dwelling unit owners, but is willing to accept installment payments over 12 months. Google has also promised to refund the installation fees in $25 monthly increments for each paying customer until the $300 per unit fee is returned. But if a renter opts for the free, slower Internet service Google provides, the landlord will have to absorb the installation cost.

“If people can get free Internet, they’re not going to pay for premium,” Gambill told the newspaper. “If someone doesn’t want to pay for Internet, they really don’t have to, but then we’ve lost out on that reimbursement.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Donahue
Jim Donahue
10 years ago

Not quite the panacea everyone said it was, now is it?

Scott
Scott
10 years ago
Reply to  Jim Donahue

Sure, it’s not a great deal for the building owner to have to pony up $300 per unit in full before getting paid back, but I’d hardly blame Google for trying to recoup the install costs plus hardware given to the tenant. They might be able to figure out a better deal, such as only charging $100-150 per tenant in large multi-tenant building if they figure out the typical ratio of tenants that sign up for their $80/mo to cover the discount, and not offer the refund. Point is, any halfway decent rental with Google Fiber is going to be… Read more »

elfonblog
10 years ago

There’s no question that installation should be cheaper for multi-dwelling units. Google should break down the $300 installation/router/service fee, and just charge managements for the initial cable drops. There would be only one drop “from the pole” per building., and they’ll have attic spaces to use in many cases. They can charge regular prices to the tenant later, and refund the management in installments. That will give them nearly risk-free incentive to upgrade their “elegant towne homes” for those who require modern Internet service. I hope Google reconsiders their price points as well as speed tiers. 5Mbps @ $3.57/mo vs… Read more »

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!