Home » Competition »Consumer News »Time Warner Cable » Currently Reading:

Time Warner Cable Wins Exclusive Marketing Deal With N.Y. Apartment Complexes

Phillip Dampier March 18, 2013 Competition, Consumer News, Time Warner Cable 4 Comments

twcGreenTime Warner Cable has signed exclusive marketing deals with two apartment complexes on Staten Island that will give the cable company the sole right to pitch television, Internet, and phone services to residents.

Markham Gardens on the borough’s northern shore near Port Richmond and Park Lane at Seaview, a senior living community located in the Emerson Hill neighborhood, represent the first ever exclusive marketing deals the cable company has signed on Staten Island, and will probably not be the last.

markhamThe deal will not prevent Verizon’s FiOS fiber-to-the-home network from being available to residents in the future, but such marketing agreements can discourage residents from signing up with a competitor.

A growing number of apartment complexes in the country are signing exclusive marketing arrangements with cable operators in return for financial incentives. The agreements often bundle the cost of a renter’s cable service into the monthly rent or include it as a mandatory amenities fee. When a cable customer understands they are paying for cable service whether they want it or not, it makes it difficult for competitors to convince renters to pay for both cable service and services from the phone or satellite company.

Other types of marketing deals allow the cable operator to promote itself on an apartment complex website or through exclusive door-hangers or other marketing opportunities denied to competitors.

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. elfonblog says:

    Ugh. I hate when landlords do this. It should be illegal. Taken to the extreme, imagine a landlord dictating the type of car you drive or a dress code the residents must follow? The management has probably considered a steep “connection fee” on top of that monthly “amenities fee”, like I once encountered when trying to get my phone connected in an apartment.

    • Scott says:

      As far as Satellite goes there was always rules by the FCC prohibiting landlords from outright refusing to allow Dish installation. They could always make your life miserable over it, or refuse areas of the building and drilling, but not if you had an immediate access point like a deck with LoS.

      http://www.fcc.gov/guides/over-air-reception-devices-rule

      • txpatriot says:

        The FCC also prohibits telephone providers from signing exclusive service arrangements with apartment landlords. But they took great pains to say exclusive “marketing” arrangements were OK. I would guess most residents could not tell the difference and will assume T-W is their only choice for telephone in their apartment.

        • The end run around this is to bundle the cost of the service into your rent or make you pay it as an amenities fee through your lease agreement. Technically you could reject the service, but you will still end up paying for it whether you want it or not.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Eufemia Deemer: Savvy comments . I am thankful for the information ! Does anyone know if my company might be able to find a fillable OPM OF-306 document to edit ?...
  • Jorge Schuldt: Savvy ideas - Incidentally if you want a a form , my boss encountered a blank form here http://goo.gl/J4D1Oz....
  • Paul Houle: Wow. On a bad day I wonder if this is a key part of the endgame of the Republican party. They see a minority-majority US coming so they try to s...
  • bern jenkins: Good commentary . I loved the points - Does anyone know if I would be able to find a fillable a form form to fill in ?...
  • jennifer: Horrific customer service. But don't worry, I was assured I'd have a technician come fix my internet a week from today. :/...
  • Kyle: It has nothing to do with consumer choice on broadband. It has to do with unelected bureaucrats in the FCC, who are not accountable to congress (the p...
  • Bryan: I would never support anyone who directly or indirectly would want to limit consumer choices for internet. If a municipality can provide faster and c...
  • Kyle: The FCC is not a federal court. They should not be able to overturn state or local law. This has nothing to do with municipal broadband. It has to do ...
  • Johanna D.: Moved out of state for my job in March, was waiting for a final verizon bill, and received 3 bills from fronteir all dated the same day with different...
  • Clinton Kirk: It's not that Sen. Cruz is against the expansion of Broadband in growing communities. The issue is that it should be the States decision and not some...
  • Dahlia: If you do let me know, I will join. They try to say I used 865GB in one month and charged me an extra 20$ for overages. That is BS, there is no way in...
  • Sherice Cuadra: Timely article ! I learned a lot from the facts - Does anyone know if my business might be able to grab a blank a form copy to work with ?...

Your Account: