Home » Consumer News »Frontier » Currently Reading:

Frontier Settles Oregon Class Action Lawsuit Over Unjust FiOS Video Late Fees; Refunds Coming

Phillip Dampier January 16, 2013 Consumer News, Frontier No Comments
The case involves late fees charged to Frontier FiOS video customers in the state of Oregon.

The case involves late fees charged to Frontier FiOS video customers in the state of Oregon.

Frontier Communications FiOS video customers that paid late fees for service in the state of Oregon may be entitled to a partial refund after the telecom company settled a class action case.

The settlement, announced today will cover both current and former customers.

Some key points:

  • Customers that are potentially included in this class action settlement will receive a separate notice in the next 60 to 90 days;
  • The separate notice will include additional information and instructions regarding steps they can take if they are eligible for a refund;
  • A claims administrator will be identified and responsible for providing notices to former and existing customers;
  • Customers must wait until they receive a notice regarding the settlement from the claims administrator which outlines additional steps that must be taken.

The company was accused of unjustly charging and collecting late fees for video customers whose payments were processed late as the company assumed control of the FiOS service from Verizon Communications.

An internal memo sent to Frontier employees and obtained by Stop the Cap! suggests the company is expecting calls from customers inquiring about the settlement. Other than telling employees to express empathy, company officials have asked customer service representatives to avoid speculating about the case and referring customers to forthcoming communications from the settlement administrator within the next two to three months.

The lawsuit only covers Oregon residents.

Share






Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Ken R: Stopping people from shopping around seems a little communist! cable is no different than paying for anything else car's.TV's Computers, Cellphones, w...
  • Twizted: Oh its wanted 3.1 Docsis speeds for sure; the problem is big content providers and their pricing schemes are the number one major obstacle along with ...
  • James R Bivins: Your right other countries are leaven the usa behind.When usa please companies and leaves the customers behind.And charter is getting faster,but leavi...
  • James: He was amazing as FCC chair and you are right, he was building his resume, each group he talked to would think they were his key focus....cable won th...
  • James R Bivins: Everytime I see ad saying,they want new customers.They don't know how to get them.They talk expandion,that means update services,that should be update...
  • Andrew Madigan: I wonder what that does to the "private" wifi network. If they're sharing an antenna I bet the private network gets to fight the public network for wi...
  • Phillip Dampier: I have been looking and running into "proprietary battery" blockades. I don't believe the battery was created specifically for this device, but I do s...
  • Phillip Dampier: I can't imagine a firmware update could not correct this, but you are right you need a replacement for now because who knows exactly when that update ...
  • Phillip Dampier: The SIM card change may help restore some connectivity, but it does not resolve the degraded 4G performance. Run some speed tests. If you are in the 1...
  • Bill K: Sorry, here is the image link: http://postimg.org/image/fwpd7ttgz/...
  • Bill K: Here is a screen grab of the battery from the FCC ID submission. I am also interested in an alternate source, $35 is a bit expensive. Thank you for an...
  • John Case: I just spoke to an employee at a local Verizon authorized partner, and he indicated that the only way to really fix the phone is to replace it. He cla...

Your Account: