Home » Broadband "Shortage" »Community Networks »Competition »Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Net Neutrality »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

Susan Crawford Solves America’s Universal Broadband Problems With Policy Changes

Susan Crawford, President Barack Obama’s former Special Assistant for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy has the solution for America’s lack of universal broadband, and she solves it in just four Tweets:

  • Step 1 gives private companies the push they need to get rural broadband financing within their existing Return on Investment formulas by reducing capital costs for unserved areas;
  • Step 2 stops the corporate welfare legislation that protects the incumbent duopoly from publicly-owned competition that can ignore Wall Street’s insistence that more competition = fat profit erosion;
  • Step 3 gives the ISPs access to public land and infrastructure either at no or low cost in return for recognizing they are benefiting from that taxpayer-owned infrastructure, so they better not abuse the privilege;
  • Step 4 makes ISPs common carriers that have no financial interest in the content transported down broadband lines, thus no incentive to favor their own services while discriminating against others.

Whether such policies can withstand court challenges claiming violation of corporation free speech rights is, of course, another matter. But Crawford’s ideas create incentives for broadband providers to aggressively wire their respective service areas while avoiding monopolizing what travels down those broadband pipelines.

Currently there are 2 comments on this Article:

  1. txpatriot says:

    I guess we can quibble over the details but I think #4 should come first.

    If the FCC would simply reclassify the transport layer as a Title II service, I think the rest would follow. The key is applying that definition to both cable modem service as well as to telco copper & fiber loops.

    RUS is already doing #1; the problem is new FCC rules threaten the ability of rural telcos to repay those loans.

    I absolutely agree with #2 and #3. Unfortunately, many states (with heavy telco & cable lobbying) have already passed laws banning muni broadband networks. I say let the cities build their networks, but make them open to third-party ISPs (see #3). Then we’ll see if the telco & cable argument is correct that they can’t make money investing in high-capacity pipes if they don’t control the Internet service itself.

    I don’t know if most muni networks lock the customer in to a single ISP, but if they do, that lends credence to the telco/cable argument. If muni networks are open to third-party providers, that knocks the legs out from under the telco-cableco argument. We may learn that from the google KC experiment. Does anyone know if google’s fiber will be open? Or will google lock customers in to a single ISP?

    I usually disagree with everything Susan Crawford says but I find myself largely in agreement with this.

  2. Scott says:

    Step 5. AT&T, Verizon, and the Cable Co’s donate large sacks of campaign funds to Obama to make sure steps 1-4 never happen.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • William: I seem to be in the same situation. These are a few of the points I demand a solution to. Many of my clients have been paying for DSL Max though t...
  • finest food: Wonderful site you have here but I was wondering if you knew of any discussion boards that cover the same topics discussed in this article? I'd real...
  • diet pills work: Very good blog you have here but I was curious about if you knew of any message boards that cover the same topics talked about here? I'd really love ...
  • body boost: Hello, this weekend is good in favor of me, because this point in time i am reading this fantastic educational article here at my house....
  • Michael: I had U300 & 24mpgs (Max Turbo) internet. I called - spoke to a nice lady, who tried to rebundle me with a home line - not interested. I was alrea...
  • Kate: My 2 year contract expired in September and the bill jumped $50.00 for a bundle of voice, internet, and tv. I compared packages with competitors f...
  • AC: I have this distinct feeling that nothing will change since they pretty much never lift a finger and the revolving door bureaucracy will keep milking ...
  • Jim Livermore: I don't watch enough on YouTube to really notice, but the option to pay for an ad-free experience would be nice. I have noticed Hulu+ is lowering the ...
  • Rob: Interesting that big cable's response has absolutely nothing to do with the internet speed C Spire's Fiber to the Home is bringing to Mississippians. ...
  • C: It's about time they do something about this problem. I've been an AT&T customer for 10yrs and this month was the first time I went over the 5gb a...
  • d0764: I would actually be ok with paying $5 a month to get rid of the ads. As long as the only thing that goes are the ads with the subscription. The rest b...
  • Herb Finn: Weigel also licences the bulk of the key and evergreen classic TV shows in the CBS owned CBS/Viacom/Desilu/Paramount/Speling TV library, so they HAD t...

Your Account: