" /> Suddenlink’s Thumb on the Scale That Measures Your Usage | Stop the Cap!

Home » Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Public Policy & Gov't »Suddenlink » Currently Reading:

Suddenlink’s Thumb on the Scale That Measures Your Usage

Suddenlink’s decision to implement an Internet Overcharging scheme that couples usage caps with overlimit fees can be a real revenue-booster for the cable company, especially if a usage measurement tool decides to nip at your allowance with phantom usage that can eventually expose you to overlimit fees.

Simon, a Suddenlink customer in northern Texas contacted Stop the Cap! with news he managed to catch Suddenlink in the act of ginning up his broadband usage, measuring around 23GB of broadband usage in just one day:

Here is what Suddenlink’s usage measurement tool reports Simon has used during the month of August. Not the 23GB measurement recorded for Aug. 18.

“Suddenlink believes I used ~23GB and my router confirms I only used 2.22GB (a difference of 936%),” Simon writes. “It’s insane.”

Even more unusual is Suddenlink’s measurement tool recorded that usage on a day when a thunderstorm knocked out his cable broadband service for nearly six hours during peak usage times. It is not the first time Suddenlink’s meter has gone haywire.

Consumers are at the whim of broadband provider-supplied measurement tools, which are unregulated and unmonitored by federal, state, or local authorities. What those tools measure is what customers will be billed for, with no verification or proof of accuracy required.

Companies utilizing these measurement tools require customers to accept the provided measurements as the final word on the matter.

“I think it’s a repugnant money grab that needs to be regulated by the state or federal government,” Simon shares.

Unregulated metered billing is a dream come true for providers who can bill customers whatever they want.

Here is what Simon’s router measured on that same date – 2.22GB, almost a 1,000% difference… in Suddenlink’s favor.

Share

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. Austin says:

    It looks like Suddenlink is billing him for raw data including overhead, instead of just actual bandwidth delivered. His modem spent all day retraining and retraining and retraining, and they cheerfully counted that as service rendered. I would expect to see that they measure more bandwidth used on poorer quality lines. This would be a disincentive for them to repair them if substandard lines were more profitable.

  2. Ian L says:

    …except there’s no way that retrains would run into the tens of gigabytes in a single day. To put that into perspective, you’d have to be transmitting 1.2 GB per hour for every single hour the connection was online, for a mean data rate of around 2.7 Mbps. Not impossible if you’re heavily using the connection for a day, but impossible if a modem is trying to reconnect to the cable system.

  3. Mr Black says:

    If you don’t upgrade your modem it hard for them to meter your usage. Amount of noise meter usage is also there !! It be better for ISP to tag ad-ware cookies since most of us didn’t request their services to report on us inside our systems.







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Free Twitter Followers: There is definately a lot to find out about this issue. I like all the points you've made. my webpage :: ...
  • William Elliot: Proposing legislation to prevent small companies from offering web service is not only greedy and evil, it's against free interprise. AT&T with ...
  • ICYNDICEY: This company sucks dick!...
  • Bob: You have a serious problem. It's the fact that you're in L.A. You see, Californians are the suckers of America. You pay more for everything and get...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Paul, there are tons of ironies and tragedies in this topic; even dating back 70 and 100 years ago. But perhaps the bigger one is the impact on the a...
  • Paul Houle: If broadcasters get what they are asking for it could be the beginning of the end for OTA TV. Broadcasters get licenses to provide a public service...
  • http://www.adobe.com/: Ridiculous story there. What occurred after? Take care! Feel free to surf to my web page :: adobe - ...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Phil, I thought this was an appeal by the Broadcasters to overturn a lower court ruling in favor of Aereo. No? They just need a draw, or 4-4, to win...
  • txpatriot: Phillip I was shocked as you by WaPo's support of the merger. Personally, I support the merger, but I was very surprised by the WaPo editorial....
  • JayS: I wish you had selected a better example than Bloomberg v. CNBC channel placement. Business Tv is on, in my office, all day long. Bloomberg Tv is...
  • innovate: Verizon needs to come and deliver faster and more reliable FiOS services to all corners of United states. I can start up a new fibre optic company asa...
  • gboy: Can i get that with a metro pcs samsugm glaxy 4G lol just asking...

Your Account: