Home » Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Public Policy & Gov't »Suddenlink » Currently Reading:

Suddenlink’s Thumb on the Scale That Measures Your Usage

Suddenlink’s decision to implement an Internet Overcharging scheme that couples usage caps with overlimit fees can be a real revenue-booster for the cable company, especially if a usage measurement tool decides to nip at your allowance with phantom usage that can eventually expose you to overlimit fees.

Simon, a Suddenlink customer in northern Texas contacted Stop the Cap! with news he managed to catch Suddenlink in the act of ginning up his broadband usage, measuring around 23GB of broadband usage in just one day:

Here is what Suddenlink’s usage measurement tool reports Simon has used during the month of August. Not the 23GB measurement recorded for Aug. 18.

“Suddenlink believes I used ~23GB and my router confirms I only used 2.22GB (a difference of 936%),” Simon writes. “It’s insane.”

Even more unusual is Suddenlink’s measurement tool recorded that usage on a day when a thunderstorm knocked out his cable broadband service for nearly six hours during peak usage times. It is not the first time Suddenlink’s meter has gone haywire.

Consumers are at the whim of broadband provider-supplied measurement tools, which are unregulated and unmonitored by federal, state, or local authorities. What those tools measure is what customers will be billed for, with no verification or proof of accuracy required.

Companies utilizing these measurement tools require customers to accept the provided measurements as the final word on the matter.

“I think it’s a repugnant money grab that needs to be regulated by the state or federal government,” Simon shares.

Unregulated metered billing is a dream come true for providers who can bill customers whatever they want.

Here is what Simon’s router measured on that same date – 2.22GB, almost a 1,000% difference… in Suddenlink’s favor.

Share

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. Austin says:

    It looks like Suddenlink is billing him for raw data including overhead, instead of just actual bandwidth delivered. His modem spent all day retraining and retraining and retraining, and they cheerfully counted that as service rendered. I would expect to see that they measure more bandwidth used on poorer quality lines. This would be a disincentive for them to repair them if substandard lines were more profitable.

  2. Ian L says:

    …except there’s no way that retrains would run into the tens of gigabytes in a single day. To put that into perspective, you’d have to be transmitting 1.2 GB per hour for every single hour the connection was online, for a mean data rate of around 2.7 Mbps. Not impossible if you’re heavily using the connection for a day, but impossible if a modem is trying to reconnect to the cable system.

  3. Mr Black says:

    If you don’t upgrade your modem it hard for them to meter your usage. Amount of noise meter usage is also there !! It be better for ISP to tag ad-ware cookies since most of us didn’t request their services to report on us inside our systems.







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • roses store raleigh nc: What's up mates, its impressive post on the topic of tutoringand fully defined, keep it up all the time....
  • Golden State dui lawyers association: It's an remarkable piece of writing in support of all the internet users; they will obtain advantage from it I am sure. my page ... ...
  • baceba: Unbelievable! Comcast has the WORST service for cable television AND internet. The only customers they have are HOSTAGES to a monopoly! Why don't t...
  • Anne: Good replies in return of this query with firm arguments and explaining all regarding that....
  • adobe photoshop serial number generator: I read this piece of writing fully concerning the comparison of newest and earlier technologies, it's remarkable article. my homepage - ...
  • elfonblog: It hit us here in Austin TX. It looked like a DNS outage... but I was using Google DNS. Routing was NOT down... I could still access a selection of we...
  • Joe Porter: To be fair, do we know it was in fact "one technician" that caused the issue?...
  • Milan In Austin: I'm surprised that Austin Mayor Lee Leffingwell is supporting the TWC/Comcast merger. Leffingwell was a proponent of bringing Google Fiber to Austin. ...
  • elfonblog: Oh Oh Oh, there's mine! Ole Lee L effing better well stop playing games. I should have begun gloating about my Google Fiber months ago. I did get a ts...
  • Mcfly1391: Nelson Parker: at 20:30:36 Thank you for contacting Time Warner Cable Internet technical support. My name is Nelson Parker and I would be happy to he...
  • Dylan “BigD-257” Smith: Even though they say you can watch on two devices at the same time, I can still only watch on one! And my streaming plan allows for two devices simult...
  • TB: So I am fortunate enough to have a new competitor on the block in the form of Google Fiber. They are still about a year out from installing in my nei...

Your Account: