Home » Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't »Verizon » Currently Reading:

Verizon Wireless’ ‘America’s Choice’ Customers Receiving Class Action Benefits

Phillip Dampier July 26, 2012 Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Verizon 5 Comments

If you were or remain a customer of Verizon Wireless under either their America’s Choice I or America’s Choice II plans (unavailable to new customers), a class action settlement benefit should be arriving in your mailbox this week.

In July 2005, a lawsuit was brought against Verizon Wireless alleging the company improperly assessed roaming charges on customers. Cowit et al. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless was filed in Hamilton County, Ohio. In eventually became a nationwide class action case.

The two sides reached a settlement for all America’s Choice customers, one that considerably benefits the plaintiff’s lawyers. They will receive attorney’s fees, costs and incentive awards not to exceed $6 million dollars. The original complainant, Barry Koblenz, will receive a check in the mail from Verizon Wireless for the princely sum of $50. Koblenz can also apply for an “incentive award” not to exceed $10,000. Other Class Representatives can apply for their own awards not to exceed $20,000 each.

What do customers get? Not much:

  • Customers who did not submit a valid claim to participate in the action by the fall of 2011 will receive 25 additional calling minutes good on any Verizon Wireless plan when you exceed your current calling allowance. The minutes expire in one year.
  • Customers who submitted a valid claim will receive a transferable long distance calling “card” worth up to 40 minutes of domestic long distance calling (or around 13 minutes of international calling) valid for 24 months.
  • All affected customers enrolled in an unlimited calling plan will receive the long distance calling “card” as described above.
Verizon Wireless denies all wrongdoing.

Currently there are 5 comments on this Article:

  1. Alan says:

    Check out tons of class action settlement claims at http://www.mysettlementclaims.com. I already claimed $400. This is legit. Gotta keep these companies accountable!

    • sgt says:

      Keep them accountable? What a joke. The attornies benefit. Nothing really gets changed and the ‘companies’ go merrily on their theiving ways. If the people that they damage were really given some compensation, it just might make a difference, but, as it is right now, these companies make agreements with the greedy attorneys and walk away with a smile!

      We Americans have become ‘suckers’ by not thinking things through.

    • Scott says:

      Settlements are exactly that, a settlement between the company and lawyers that leaves large amounts of money in both of their pockets so business can continue as usual.

      These are slaps on the wrist, not an admission of guilt, and purely a calculation by the defendant on how they can still profit yet pay the lawyers enough but not too much to justify them to go away.

      I do find it funny now days that many of the settlements are disbursing the funds primarily to non-profits and the lawyers primarily with a token amount to the named individuals that brought it forward, then finally some service credits for anyone else.

  2. Kevin says:

    What do customers get? Not much:

    Exactly. This is why I never claim benefits or participate in class actions. Until the day a class action can net me some real compensation (read a few hundred to couple thousand dollars) I am not interested.

  3. Judy says:

    I just received my ‘free’ minutes in the mail. The lawyers should be embarrassed. They got paid 6 million!

    If someone wants to use the free minutes to call their loved ones serving in Afghanistan, they get 3 minutes out of this deal.

    If someone wants to use them to call Mexico, they get 13 minutes.

    How is this holding anyone accountable? 40 minutes of free long distance service in the US when most people get that included in their plans for free now! Really guys!

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Sora87: I don't know what's worse for Taxes. Chicago or New York. The Least they could do is put the funds from the Tax to pay for a Fiber to the Home broadba...
  • Amilayah: Totally depends on your devices and needs. Older devices need b/g/n network compatibility. Newer ones are best on 5ghz a/c bandwidths. (A/c should be ...
  • Amilayah: Hey dummie! Because what ppl are referring to is an ADD ON service we PAY FOR so that they will be responsible for worry free wifi. Which is what I to...
  • Greg Noblin: My family has an iMac, I use a 5K iMac for my business, we have two girls, 4 iPhones, 2 iPod touches, and 4 iPads and an Apple TV. Today is July 4,...
  • BobInIllinois: Never underestimate the ability of Chicago politicians to keep finding more things to tax, while continuing to increase tax rates on all of the exist...
  • Matt: In Hawaii, meaning there is no real competition. Had the (15/1) plan, and the Standard HD TV all after taxes $142. They were also charging me for the...
  • dawsonfiberhood: Uh, the culprit has been committing dozens of acts, across many states, and nearly simultaneously in widely separated areas. The culprit has been exca...
  • Roy: I'm a Dish subscriber. As best as I could tell, your Dish page covered only corporate issues. Do you have a page that discusses how to score deals f...
  • Phillip Dampier: We have plenty of DoT fiber around here that is black on the pole but is orange running down the pole or at the point it descends underground or into ...
  • Aaron: Outdoor fiber cable doesn't have bright orange insulation. Every buried or aerial fiber I've ever encountered was black, with a thick outer sheath, s...
  • James R Curry: I filed an FCC Open Internet complaint about the 600kbps video throttling back on June 19th. This morning, I received a call from Sprint's executiv...
  • Limboaz: I'd sooner have a root canal without freezing than watch most of the worthless content on Showtime. They put the weird in Hollyweird....

Your Account: