Home » AT&T »Consumer News »Video » Currently Reading:

AT&T Bills Customer After Canceling, Then Denies It Ever Happened

Phillip Dampier July 10, 2012 AT&T, Consumer News, Video No Comments

AT&T denied it was billing the DeFazio family. (KCBS)

A Sacramento family that continued to receive bills from AT&T more than a half-year after closing their account got an interesting response when they questioned the charges: AT&T denied they were billing the family at all.

Naomi DeFazio cancelled her service with AT&T in November, but nobody told AT&T’s billing department who continued to faithfully bill her $4.84 a month for long distance service the family stopped using. The family wants the charges stopped, but that proved more difficult than they first imagined when AT&T claimed they were not, in fact, billing her at all.

That was news to DeFazio, who showed a growing pile of AT&T phone bills to a local consumer reporter.

“I think they’re just expecting me to pay it just to get them off my back,” DeFazio told KCBS. “Nobody wants to take responsibility for looking into this.”

KCBS:

AT&T, a communications company, eventually admitted it had a communication problem.

“We inadvertently billed a monthly minimum charge and the taxes and surcharges which should not have applied,” said company spokesman John Britton. “We have corrected it.”

AT&T apologized, wiping out her balance.

“It would have been a lot nicer to have an explanation a lot earlier in this process,” DeFazio said.

If you are getting the runaround from AT&T, call 1-800-791-6661 to reach AT&T’s Office of the President. Those executive level customer service representatives are empowered to get things done for customers that lower level representatives cannot.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/KCBS San Francisco ATT Bills Customers for Canceled Service 7-9-12.mp4

KCBS shows AT&T’s phone bills to viewers that the phone company denied ever existed. It took a consumer reporter to finally get AT&T to stop billing a Sacramento woman for long distance service she canceled more than a half-year ago.  (2 minutes)

Share






Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Phillip Dampier: Long time readers here will know, of course, that we chase everyone that is pro-company, anti-consumer, regardless of party....
  • Phillip Dampier: Give me the model/type of the current battery in your system and I'll do some research. Sometimes the low low price elsewhere is for lousy Chinese bat...
  • KM: Anyone know a source for third party batteries for these? Comcast's $35 + shipping seems high, especially if you want 2 which the box allows....
  • elfonblog: Yeah, I'm getting pretty sick of the word "unlimited" meaning "for any amount of time" rather than "for any amount of activity". Of course, people thi...
  • Paul Houle: Wow, here's an example of a cable company doing the right thing....
  • txpatriot: Thanx I missed Hoyle. Everyone else cited in the article was identified by party affiliation except Hoyle and Black. I was just trying to ensure you...
  • Phillip Dampier: That should be evident from the fact the Dems controlled the legislature for a century until 2011. Hoyle and Harrell were also Democrats....
  • txpatriot: Just for the record, former House Speaker Jim Black was (and maybe still is) a Democrat. You can read about the scandal at: http://en.wikipedia.or...
  • txpatriot: Brian, calm down and take a couple of deep breaths. If you have a complaint, it's with ACSI and how they categorized ISPs for purposes of their s...
  • Phillip Dampier: An Internet Service Provider is defined here (and elsewhere, to be honest) as any company using any technology to deliver Internet access to consumers...
  • Brian: Please tell me who the ISPs are ! In another article I read recently the writer said that the ISPs were VZ, AT&T and Comcast. Can't you get ...
  • txpatriot: Pulling the battery would be the best way to ensure the cell network can't track your movements. But that's kinda inconvenient....

Your Account: