Home » Canada »Consumer News »Public Policy & Gov't »Rogers »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Rogers’ 49 Foot Cell Tower in Quebec Backyard Still Standing, But Non-Operational

Phillip Dampier May 15, 2012 Canada, Consumer News, Public Policy & Gov't, Rogers, Wireless Broadband No Comments

This monopole cell tower antenna just showed up one day in the backyard of this Kirkland, PQ resident.

Rogers Communications installed a 49-foot monopole cellular antenna in the backyard of a Kirkland, Que. resident earlier this year, but the only signals being transmitted are discussions over its fate at town hall.

Residents were furious when a neighbor leased out a portion of a residential backyard to Rogers, who claims the small cube antenna mounted on the pole will improve cell reception in the immediate area. Ever since Stop the Cap! first covered this story earlier this year, local officials have been flummoxed about what they can do about the antenna, which is currently non-operational.

“For now (there is) no resolution, but talks are progressing,” Kirkland’s director general Joe Sanalitro told The West Island Gazette. “We are demanding it come down.”

Rogers and Kirkland officials have been meeting about the antenna, which has generated considerable interest and complaints over whether the company used a zoning loophole to sneak the antenna into the neighborhood.

If allowed to stand, residents fear Rogers and other cell companies could offer cash incentives to other homeowners to erect similar towers, increasing visual pollution.

Industry Canada rules state towers less than 15 meters are excluded from municipal notification rules and do not require permits to install.  Rogers was evidently aware of this rule — its Kirkland antenna tops out at 14.5 meters, just shy of the height limit.

Share






Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Antonina: Hello There. I found your weblog the usage of msn. That is a really smartly written article....
  • Vyacheslav: I relish, lead to I found exactly what I used to be taking a look for....
  • Daria: I’ll complain that you have copied materials from yet another supply...
  • Bogdan: It is the best time to make some plans for the long run and it is time to be happy. I have learn this put up and if I may I want to suggest you some f...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Phil, first, suggest 3 people you think are more qualified and we'll do an objective analysis. Second, are you aware of the personal expense Mr. Wh...
  • Anfisa: As I web-site possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling great , appreciate it for your efforts....
  • Danny Lampley: "As we’ve reported before, Tom Wheeler has said almost nothing on his blog about consumer interests . . . ." Expecting a bit much aren't we? After ...
  • Phillip Dampier: I received information from our friends in North Carolina: AT&T has already won the right to redline customers in states like N.C. where they have a s...
  • elfonblog: And I certainly have a problem with that. AT&T is suggesting that they *deserve* the same deal. And they don't. Always playing the victim. Poor, p...
  • txpatriot: The NY PSC partially approved the VZ Tariff filing; you can find the Order and press release on this page: http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Matte...
  • txpatriot: AT&T is saying that if google is allowed to redline, then AT&T s/b allowed to redline....
  • Damaeus: Joshua Taylor says: >>> [SNIP]--- Get rid of your internet, save your money and READ. Who cares about AT&T and the Internet? ---[SNIP]...

Your Account: