Home » Broadband Speed »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

71% of British Public Willing to Pay More for Superfast Broadband… If They Could Get It

Phillip Dampier March 13, 2012 Broadband Speed, Rural Broadband 1 Comment

While some Internet Service Providers claim their broadband customers don’t need faster speeds, that is not what customers are telling surveyors.  A new British survey of over 800 Internet users found 71% would happily pay extra for a “superfast broadband connection” at speeds of 25Mbps or higher if only they could get it.

Over half of the respondents (55%) reported they could not get fast speeds even if they wanted them.

The survey, conducted by ISPreview, found price was only a barrier for around 16% of customers and only 6.2% of respondents claimed they were satisfied with the speeds they received from their current provider.

Prices in Britain for broadband are historically lower than what North Americans pay, averaging around $27 per month, according to UK regulator Ofcom.  Customers were willing to pay at least $8 more per month if they could get the speeds they crave.

“Ofcom’s own data appears to suggest that the UK is one of the lowest priced countries in the world for broadband,” said ISPreview.co.uk’s Founder, Mark Jackson. “As a result it’s quite encouraging that so many people, most of which will be use to paying very little for their current service, would still be willing to pay more for the next generation of superfast connectivity.”

Jackson reports the highest demand for the fastest speeds actually comes from rural areas in the United Kingdom — areas long deprived of suitable broadband.  Jackson says most operators are focused on upgrading urban areas which already receive better service than rural communities.

The government has plans in place to reach 90% of the country with superfast broadband by 2015.

Share

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. Munly Leong says:

    think you mean Britons :)







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Phillip Dampier: Long time readers here will know, of course, that we chase everyone that is pro-company, anti-consumer, regardless of party....
  • Phillip Dampier: Give me the model/type of the current battery in your system and I'll do some research. Sometimes the low low price elsewhere is for lousy Chinese bat...
  • KM: Anyone know a source for third party batteries for these? Comcast's $35 + shipping seems high, especially if you want 2 which the box allows....
  • elfonblog: Yeah, I'm getting pretty sick of the word "unlimited" meaning "for any amount of time" rather than "for any amount of activity". Of course, people thi...
  • Paul Houle: Wow, here's an example of a cable company doing the right thing....
  • txpatriot: Thanx I missed Hoyle. Everyone else cited in the article was identified by party affiliation except Hoyle and Black. I was just trying to ensure you...
  • Phillip Dampier: That should be evident from the fact the Dems controlled the legislature for a century until 2011. Hoyle and Harrell were also Democrats....
  • txpatriot: Just for the record, former House Speaker Jim Black was (and maybe still is) a Democrat. You can read about the scandal at: http://en.wikipedia.or...
  • txpatriot: Brian, calm down and take a couple of deep breaths. If you have a complaint, it's with ACSI and how they categorized ISPs for purposes of their s...
  • Phillip Dampier: An Internet Service Provider is defined here (and elsewhere, to be honest) as any company using any technology to deliver Internet access to consumers...
  • Brian: Please tell me who the ISPs are ! In another article I read recently the writer said that the ISPs were VZ, AT&T and Comcast. Can't you get ...
  • txpatriot: Pulling the battery would be the best way to ensure the cell network can't track your movements. But that's kinda inconvenient....

Your Account: