Home » Broadband Speed »Competition »Consumer News »Frontier »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

Updated: Frontier’s Free DSL Speed Downgrades; West Virginians Wonder Where the Better Broadband Is

Phillip Dampier February 9, 2012 Broadband Speed, Competition, Consumer News, Frontier, Rural Broadband 11 Comments

Broadband life in Frankford, Greenbrier County, W.V. may be slow, but few customers of Frontier Communications thought things could get even slower.  And then they did.

Stop the Cap! reader DJ has been frustrated with the performance of his phone company — Frontier, that took control of Verizon’s landline network across the state.  Verizon rarely got the hopes up for customers waiting more than a decade for broadband service to reach them.  Dana Waldo, Frontier’s senior vice president and general manager did, telling West Virginians Frontier would propel the Mountain State from its current rank of 47th in the country to the top 5.  Achieving that goal seems unlikely when the company quietly reduces some customers’ broadband speeds.

“We are on the High Speed Max plan which gives us, or should I say gave us 3.5Mbps,” DJ shares.  Although his phone line supported that speed, Frontier’s congested network could not, especially at night when speeds dropped dramatically.  It took several months for Frontier to upgrade local facilities in the county to better manage the broadband demands of customers who pay $110 a month for DSL and phone service.

Frontier representatives promised the Pocahontas Times further upgrades were on the way by February of 2011, DJ says. February came and went and promised speeds of 5Mbps never arrived and Frontier representatives told DJ they didn’t know a thing about a 5Mbps broadband plan.

Fast forward to last spring: Frontier’s website suddenly advertised speeds up to 12Mbps.

Frontier's Mysterious Upgrade List

“I first contacted them through their Twitter account and was told I could receive 8Mbps, went through all the processes and a few days later I was told I [already] had the maximum speed available for my area and nothing was ever done,” DJ writes.

The Phantom “Network Upgrades” List

More discouraging to DJ was the surprise appearance of a Network Upgrades listing on the company’s website that again promised better days for customers in states like West Virginia.

“The geniuses at Frontier listed us as Frankfort instead of Frankford but either way we were listed to get upgrades at the end of [this past] November,” DJ says. “The date came, the date passed. Never once did I see a Frontier truck out working. I still found myself [with] 3.5Mbps and after being lied to about upgrades for the third time in a few years I was ticked.”

Frontier representatives would later wonder where DJ obtained the Network Upgrades list, which has since disappeared from the company’s website.  Stop the Cap! has an archived copy here (PDF).

The worst part of DJ’s story came on Jan. 24, when Frontier reduced his speed from 3.5Mbps to 1.3Mbps without notice or explanation.  Frontier, the phone company that provides free speed decreases for customers, is not part of any marketing plan DJ knows about, so he began calling the company for answers.

“I was told my speed would be fixed when “upgrades” were complete,” DJ reports. Later that day, after a series of complaint calls, his old speed returned, leaving him right where he started in 2010.

“There is no excuse for that kind of treatment and it has been going on for years,” DJ says. “It’s a shame we can’t get anything else; Suddenlink literally stops serving just down the road with 10Mbps service — sad.”

[Updated 3/26 2:31pm ET:  Changed piece to reflect unincorporated Frankford is actually in Greenbrier County, not Pocahontas.]

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DJ
DJ
12 years ago

Thanks for getting this out there for others to read, I do appreciate it.

I do have some slightly good news though, I might be moving!!! No more Frontier!!

jr
jr
12 years ago

Frontier CEO Mary Agnes Wilderotter received $8,584,002 in total compensation in 2010

Hank
Hank
12 years ago

This speed reduction and congestion is wider spread in WV than listed in the article. Frontier is not forth coming when these issues will be corrected.

Jeff
Jeff
12 years ago

I wish you would also report that Frontier inherited a crap network from Verizon, which was basically just harvesting its rural ILECs for the cash flows and had woefully underinvested in them for years. Capital expenditures for Verizon were concentrated in big cities and their suburbs only.

Frontier is doing the best it can to build out the middle mile and last mile, but these things take time. You can’t just wave a magic wand and have it happen overnight.

DJ
DJ
12 years ago
Reply to  Jeff

@Jeff

The network I’m on was not a former Verizon network, nor were the ones in Pocahontas County.

Frontier owned all of these before, but then bought the lines in Lewisburg which is 20 minutes south of here, they get Suddenlink 10Mb there.

Verizon previously had offered customers 6Mb DSL there from my understanding, however once Frontier took over those lines the speeds dropped considerably.

Mike
12 years ago

Like DJ, I also live in the Frankford, WV, local dialing area ((304) 497-XXXX). Our download speeds are generally in the range of 200-300kbps (yes, that’s KILOBITS per second) in the evening hours. If we were getting 3.5Mbps service, as DJ says he is, we’d be rejoicing. It is generally impossible to stream video and, often, even audio cannot be streamed. Web page accesses are slow, and it took me over an hour to download a copy of Quickbooks the other night (I can do the same download at my office, where I have Suddenlink, in much less than 5… Read more »

Mike
12 years ago

Thanks, Phillip. That’s very helpful. We previously wrote the Public Service Commission, but got no reply. The Attorney General’s Office has been more helpful, but their approach is voluntary mediation, unless they decide that there is fraud and prosecute, which they have been known to do in other cases. To my way of thinking, selling non-existent bandwidth is every bit as fraudulent as selling any other commodity that you just don’t have. At this point, I’m inclined to wait ’till the end of the week and see if they really do anything. If not, I’ll go back through the Attorney… Read more »

Mike
12 years ago

I am actually a Frontier shareholder. There performance in that aspect is lousy, as well. I bought the stock thinking it had nowhere to go but up, but it has surprised me and gone down, down, down.

I’m really not so much interested in getting my money back (though that would be nice) as in getting true broadband. Even slow broadband would be better than one.

Thanks again!

Mike

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!