Home » AT&T »Competition »Consumer News »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

AT&T Makes Customers Pay for Reception Problems: The MicroCell Controversy

Phillip Dampier February 6, 2012 AT&T, Competition, Consumer News, Wireless Broadband No Comments

AT&T 3G MicroCell

AT&T has lost another customer.

PC World‘s Tony Bradley noticed reception on AT&T’s network in suburban Houston has been losing bars in more places than it has maintained over the last few years.

“[...] for reasons unknown to me the AT&T network in my area has been getting steadily worse. There have been a couple of weak spots in the same location for years. Rather than improving and eliminating those weak spots, the weak spots became dead zones…and then proliferated.

I don’t live in the boonies. I live in suburban Houston in a community that is very near a major highway, and yet there are four or five areas with literally no service. I could almost understand if the signal decreased, or if it switched from 3G to the older Edge network in places, but in 2012 in an affluent suburb near a highway there is no excuse for a company like AT&T to have any area where my phone literally displays “No Service”.

Even with the growing dead zone epidemic, I was still reluctant to switch. I maintained that the grass is always greener, and that I was better off to stick with the devil I know. That is, until I moved.

I only moved four miles, and I am still in the same community I was in before. However, in my new house the AT&T signal is too flaky and unreliable. I have to walk to special places in my house to get a workable signal, and even then I am told constantly that I am “breaking up” by the person on the other end of the line. I often miss calls because there is no signal and my phone doesn’t even ring. I don’t realize I even had a call until I receive the voicemail.”

AT&T’s response to these kinds of reception problems is to suggest customers purchase one of their 3G MicroCell units, which delivers a wireless signal inside your home or business connected through your broadband account.  But Bradley took exception that AT&T would charge him $200 (negotiated down to $100) and a monthly service fee just to mitigate the company’s own reception problems.  AT&T has since lost Bradley as a long-lasting customer — he took his business to Verizon Wireless, which offers better reception in his neighborhood.

The columnist cannot understand why AT&T would treat a long-term customer so poorly.

“AT&T could have kept me happy, but chose to let me leave instead,” Bradley writes.  “So, let me get this straight. AT&T isn’t capable of delivering the service I am already paying for, and the proposed solution is that I spend $200 (or $100 after a lengthy and heated debate), plus additional money every month for the privilege of routing my calls over the broadband Internet service I am also paying for? That was really the last straw for me with AT&T.”

Share






Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • txpatriot: Phillip, speaking for myself, the reason I keep coming back is because you publish good stuff. And anytime I have a difference of opinion with you, j...
  • Phillip Dampier: If the information cannot stand up to scrutiny, it is a disservice to publish it, so I always appreciate those with different views sharing them here....
  • Phillip Dampier: I appreciate your comments. I try and sort out any considerable editorializing by labeling those articles with the tag "Editorial & Site News" so read...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): There has to be some humor in his name closely resembling the telecom LATA, or local access and transport area. LATA's played a big role in the frict...
  • txpatriot: I agree Phillip's is one of the best consumer telco blogs out there. I don't always agree with him, but he's been unfailingly courteous in his dealin...
  • Milan In Austin: Rachel, an Austin TWC retention specialist contacted me this morning around 11:00AM. She gently scolded me for using "social media" to request a broad...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Your column is one of the most informative out there; and I scan 30-40 daily and monitor another 300-400 twitter feeds across 10 topical groupings as ...
  • Phillip Dampier: When they ask why you are downgrading, tell them your modem doesn't support the fastest speeds and you object to the modem rental fee. So because they...
  • Charles: Yeah, with government subsidies and the overcharging for the services that are done in this country, there is no legitimate reason the U.S. has averag...
  • Milan In Austin: The TWC Speed Upgrade are now LIVE in Austin!!! http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3540155210 Going to downgrade to Ultimate 100 via Twitter (curren...
  • Phillip Dampier: There is no easy way for me to know. We do have a lot of visits from state utility commissions, Wall Street, various telecom companies and journalists...
  • txpatriot: Definitely complain to your state PUC and the FCC (although I doubt there is much they can do), and complain as well to your state Attorney General an...

Your Account: