Home » Consumer News »Online Video »Video » Currently Reading:

Netflix Business Model “Not Remotely Sustainable;” Content Owners Can Make or Break Streaming

Phillip Dampier February 2, 2012 Consumer News, Online Video, Video 2 Comments

Porter Bibb, managing partner at Mediatech Capital Partners LLC, and Kevin Landis, chief investment officer at First Hand Capital Management, discuss Netflix Inc.’s fourth-quarter results and outlook. Although results improved, a large amount of Netflix streamed content licensed from Starz will disappear this month.  More importantly, their long term business model is “not remotely sustainable” as programming acquisition costs continue to skyrocket, says Bibb.  Bibb and Landis speak with Emily Chang on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.”  (6 minutes)

Currently there are 2 comments on this Article:

  1. Alex Perrier says:

    It would be nice if they let you pay per view, such as $1 for SD or $2 for HD, for those customers who don’t want to commit to a unlimited $8/month plan.

    • me says:

      There are services out there like that. For example Amazon is usually about 3 bucks per. With some stuff free if you use their prime stuff.

      Interesting view on the dynamic of what Netflix is up against. One dude is saying they have a nice customer base. The other is saying they do not have the cash going forward to buy more content. The more content is exactly what I hear from most people who have netflix. Lots of crap 80/90s b movies. Missing lots of blockbusters from years past. Hit or miss on latest blockbusters.

      Their mail business is fairly easy to understand number of discs shipped is a cost plus packaging (they do a lot by hand). Then subtract that from money in per customer. Limit the number of discs in and out and you are in the black.

      Their streaming business is a bit more difficult as there fixed cost is just bw per show (and how much they have colocated). The variable cost is what the studios are charging. Is it flat rate? Per view? Sounds like the are amortizing it across all viewers. So it becomes *way* more important the number of viewers you have. As you can then lower the per user cost and bully a little bit with I have x number of viewers who will no longer watch your show.

      If they went to a per pay per view model you would see some sort of point system or straight up limit of number of movies per month you can watch.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Elbert Davis: This is absolutely breathtaking in regards to the arrogance of the bill. Byron and the lobbyists/monopolies left absolutely nothing to chance. Kudos...
  • Roger: I wasn't aware of Esquire being spawned from Style, but I do remember that it was positioned as the replacement for G4, which catered to those interes...
  • Paul Houle: My take is that a "wireless recession" will soon be at hand. There are a number of stories talked about on this site that, I think, are connected w...
  • Keanyn Gray: frontier every month for the last 8 month for incorrect bills amounts, each time they tell me they will correct credit my bills to the agreed amount ...
  • JayS: Channels, before they were removed from Tv and used to start the cellular telephone networks, went up to 83. Due to technology limitations, UHF (...
  • Josh: As near as I can tell we've had broadcast TV spectrum stolen from us TWICE. (Once during the NTSC to ATSC transition, but apparently once before that...
  • Phillip Dampier: The retention staff in Syracuse actually stopped handling those types of calls in early 2016 and referred everyone to the national customer retention ...
  • T Nelson: I am a Twc customer in the Rochester, NY area. In November my special promotion program ran out. In the past I had dealt with a retention specialist...
  • Milan Gohil: Thank you for publicizing my ordeal, Phillip! I hope this report opens the eyes of consumers and Spectrum executives!...
  • LG: They should be taken into Federal receivership. They only care about cell phones, so we need to take that away from them. Make it a requirement to m...
  • Joe V: Six months ago I moved from San Francisco to southeastern Massachusetts 30 miles south from Boston. It is pathetic that on one side of my town they ...
  • Matt K: Does that 23% on fiber count only true FTTH or are they also counting crap like AT&T's Uverse?...

Your Account: