Home » Consumer News »Online Video »Video » Currently Reading:

Netflix Business Model “Not Remotely Sustainable;” Content Owners Can Make or Break Streaming

Phillip Dampier February 2, 2012 Consumer News, Online Video, Video 2 Comments

[flv width=”360″ height=”290″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/Bloomberg Netflix Business Model Not Sustainable 1-25-12.mp4[/flv]

Porter Bibb, managing partner at Mediatech Capital Partners LLC, and Kevin Landis, chief investment officer at First Hand Capital Management, discuss Netflix Inc.’s fourth-quarter results and outlook. Although results improved, a large amount of Netflix streamed content licensed from Starz will disappear this month.  More importantly, their long term business model is “not remotely sustainable” as programming acquisition costs continue to skyrocket, says Bibb.  Bibb and Landis speak with Emily Chang on Bloomberg Television’s “Bloomberg West.”  (6 minutes)

Currently there are 2 comments on this Article:

  1. Alex Perrier says:

    It would be nice if they let you pay per view, such as $1 for SD or $2 for HD, for those customers who don’t want to commit to a unlimited $8/month plan.

    • me says:

      There are services out there like that. For example Amazon is usually about 3 bucks per. With some stuff free if you use their prime stuff.

      Interesting view on the dynamic of what Netflix is up against. One dude is saying they have a nice customer base. The other is saying they do not have the cash going forward to buy more content. The more content is exactly what I hear from most people who have netflix. Lots of crap 80/90s b movies. Missing lots of blockbusters from years past. Hit or miss on latest blockbusters.

      Their mail business is fairly easy to understand number of discs shipped is a cost plus packaging (they do a lot by hand). Then subtract that from money in per customer. Limit the number of discs in and out and you are in the black.

      Their streaming business is a bit more difficult as there fixed cost is just bw per show (and how much they have colocated). The variable cost is what the studios are charging. Is it flat rate? Per view? Sounds like the are amortizing it across all viewers. So it becomes *way* more important the number of viewers you have. As you can then lower the per user cost and bully a little bit with I have x number of viewers who will no longer watch your show.

      If they went to a per pay per view model you would see some sort of point system or straight up limit of number of movies per month you can watch.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • dhkjsalhf: "Another classic case of businesses being much smarter than governments." I don't know whether this was sarcastic or not, but I feel it's a sentiment...
  • New Yorker: It makes no sense. I wonder sometimes if raising the limits on how much money rich people giving to candidates could make it more expensive to buy of...
  • New Yorker: Will New York go through with the threat? As an upstater I have seen infrastructure projects drag on in cost and time (eg. 1.5 yrs to repair a tiny b...
  • Matthew H Mosher: Another classic case of businesses being much smarter than governments....
  • Matthew H Mosher: Doesn't matter. Rural NY will remain left behind....
  • Dylan: Hopefully this does not happen as I would like to see Charter continue with its current plans of upgrades in NY, like the 200mbps upgrade. Maybe Chart...
  • Phillip Dampier: If they withdraw the granted merger, Spectrum will not be able to continue business in New York. The franchises, which are still in the name of Time W...
  • John: Charter will not pack it in, the regionality of their franchises and their future value are too important. Franchises in NY are not exclusive, the onl...
  • Fred Hall: Too bad Sprint's network sucks in 99% of the places I live/travel to....
  • Fred Hall: First - as I've said before, $2M is pocket change for Charter/Spectrum. They should just chalk it up to the cost of doing business. Second - so what...
  • Paul Houle: I think the third package was designed to pop eyes. First it is closer to a "quad play" than a triple play bundle. The "triple play" bundle of home ...
  • Phillip Dampier: $40-50 sounds suspiciously low. Are you sure that isn't a promotional rate which customers may not be able to get after a year or two? AT&T's bun...

Your Account: