Home » Broadband "Shortage" »Canada »Competition »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Online Video »Public Policy & Gov't »Rogers »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

What Spectrum Crunch? Rogers Caps Your Data Usage But Plans Unlimited LTE Video-on-Demand

Wireless operator (and cable company) Rogers Communications likes to spend big dollars pushing the message Canada is in the midst of a wireless spectrum crunch — a big reason why it wants “equal treatment”-bidding in upcoming spectrum auctions that may include “set-asides” exclusively for emerging Canadian wireless competitors.

But apparently the spectrum shortage only impacts areas outside of the province of Quebec, because Rogers plans to experiment with a new LTE wireless video on demand service it plans to pitch Quebecers, perhaps as early as next year.

Rogers CEO Nadir Mohamed told the Montreal Gazette the cable company intends to enter the Quebec market with an “over-the-top” on-demand video service, distributed over Rogers’ growing LTE wireless broadband network.  While Mohamed was quick to say this doesn’t mean Rogers intends to launch a full-scale competitive invasion against provincial providers Videotron, Ltd., and Bell Canada Enterprises, it is pre-emptively getting into the business of serving cord-cutters who drop traditional cable packages to watch online video.

The new service is expected to be accessible on phones, tablets, and Internet-enabled televisions and video game consoles, presumably through a wireless Internet adapter.

Mohamed

“Video for wireless has huge potential for growth,” Mohamed told the Gazette. “It’s sort of the mirror image of (how cable evolved), which went from video, to data to voice.”

Nothing eats bandwidth like online video, and Rogers traditionally caps this and other usage on their mobile wireless network, citing spectrum and capacity shortages. But Rogers sees few impediments serving up certain kinds of online video: namely their own.

That’s not a message the company continues to deliver consumers on its “I Want My LTE” website, part of a robust lobbying effort to get its hands on as much new spectrum as possible, even if it means locking out would-be competitors.  In fact, leaving the impression the company has spectrum to spare is so politically dangerous, Mohamed took the wind out of his own announcement by mentioning, as an aside, their networks still don’t have enough capacity to deliver full-motion video to a large number of customers at the same time.

“I think wireless networks in the foreseeable future will not have the capability to deliver full-motion video to a large number of customers at the same time, even with LTE,” he said. “So what you will see is an integration of wired and wireless, where the wireless network will off-load the traffic to a wired network.”

Rogers’ decision to limit the service, both in scope and range, is also designed to protect itself (and other cable operators) from unnecessary competition.  Rogers won’t offer a full menu of video services outside of its traditional cable system areas in Ontario, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland, and only Quebec residents (where Rogers doesn’t sell cable TV) will have the option of signing up for the wireless video-on-demand service.

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. ScytheNoire says:

    Why is this surprising? Data caps and throttling have always been about avoiding competition and nothing to do with the limit of hardware. They purposely slow things down to justify their lies. If they took a small percentage of their profits to improve infrastructure, things would be so much better. This is what you get with corporate telecom monopolies and why Canada fails so hard in the telecom industry.

    • Alex Perrier says:

      Cheaper TV isn’t new to Canada. Vidéotron did it in Québec, and now Bell has it wherever it or Telus have coverage. Their brand Virgin, too. The cost is $1 per hour, and assume for the benefit of the doubt that 1 hour = 1 GB. If i were to stream that same GB for non-Bell TV video, i would pay $30 for 6 GB, or $5 per GB. Of course, that’s a promotional price! Normally, their prices for 1 GB are simply ridiculous and non-affordable for regular use.

  2. Paul says:

    Go figure…..why am I not surprised…..

    Paul

  3. Leafs GM? says:

    Im kinda curious as to why you area customer with a company that you write about to mis informed Canadians that dont realize there are Indie ISP options out there im new to this sight so sorry if you have a valid reason that you support there caps and gauging by being a customer I myself am a Rogers wireless customer 🙁 and have been for 13 years even when I drove north of hwy 7 and barely got signal ever and I lived north of hwy 7 but when my contracts up this time im not getting a new phone with them I always had great customer support but Nadmir Mohamed or if you in his entourage then Moham is running this once i believe respectable company into the likes of the Toronto Maple Leafs or Nortel its time for change in the Rogers top offices. And its not like he’ll be unemployed for to long just as Burkes plan is starting to fall in place MLSE will need a replacement before he makes the Leafs a succesful franchise.

    Say no to Bill C-10 cuz unless you never downloaded a song, then you would be an ex con.
    (Mandatory minimum jailtime sentences for first time theft under $5000 offenders no exceptions) Google “Bill C-10” to see Canadas demise. They’ll be able to track and spy to get you in a cell to die,even for just petty theft under five, im kinda scared im gunna go cry, cuz i hear Bubbas a pretty mean guy, with atleast 12 inches on his right thigh, I wish i knew Canada got Spotify

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Jorgie: It's not just net neutrality they want to eliminate, they also want to eliminate Obamacare. Trump will not give up. He will continue the fight to repe...
  • Milan Gohil: Phillip, I trust that you will let us know what we can do to fight this assault on our freedom! Ajit PAID is a slimy POS! Trump is well on his way to...
  • Tammy Nelson: This is crap! Why are the customers always losing and they always win? I pay quite a bit for cable and internet. If you are cutting channels, at le...
  • Mike Colceri: THIS TOTALY SUCKS!!! I LOVE CHILLER , AND NOW YOU'VE GONE AND GOTTEN RID OF IT!!!!😠 BUT MY BILL STAYS THE SAME.....MINUS MY CHILLER!!! WHOEVER IS THE ...
  • BobInIllinois: Jo, FYI on this. YouTube wanted to get this streaming service up fast. The 5 big US cities that you listed all have network tv stations owned and ...
  • Dave Burstein: Phil Good work on this. Nearly no one has reported that the FCC is paying AT&T for an offering they would have anyway....
  • Jo: Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, Philadelphia & San Francisco Bay Area This is it? it's just like google fiber.. a failure....
  • BobInIllinois: Wouldn't this be bad news for all those small, independent WISPs out there?...
  • Jp Eres: I finally filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau (New York) as well as the FCC. Magically after months and months of rude customer service...
  • LG: Let me guess.. it comes with a 200Gb bandwidth cap too, right? This month, for the first time, I actually reached my 1 Tb limit with Comcast. It's m...
  • Kerry: This makes four channels that have been removed in the last 60 days. We are still paying the same ....
  • Kerry: Should the F. C. C. step in and stop what seems to be consumer fraud ....

Your Account: