Home » Broadband "Shortage" »Canada »Competition »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Online Video »Public Policy & Gov't »Rogers »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

What Spectrum Crunch? Rogers Caps Your Data Usage But Plans Unlimited LTE Video-on-Demand

Wireless operator (and cable company) Rogers Communications likes to spend big dollars pushing the message Canada is in the midst of a wireless spectrum crunch — a big reason why it wants “equal treatment”-bidding in upcoming spectrum auctions that may include “set-asides” exclusively for emerging Canadian wireless competitors.

But apparently the spectrum shortage only impacts areas outside of the province of Quebec, because Rogers plans to experiment with a new LTE wireless video on demand service it plans to pitch Quebecers, perhaps as early as next year.

Rogers CEO Nadir Mohamed told the Montreal Gazette the cable company intends to enter the Quebec market with an “over-the-top” on-demand video service, distributed over Rogers’ growing LTE wireless broadband network.  While Mohamed was quick to say this doesn’t mean Rogers intends to launch a full-scale competitive invasion against provincial providers Videotron, Ltd., and Bell Canada Enterprises, it is pre-emptively getting into the business of serving cord-cutters who drop traditional cable packages to watch online video.

The new service is expected to be accessible on phones, tablets, and Internet-enabled televisions and video game consoles, presumably through a wireless Internet adapter.

Mohamed

“Video for wireless has huge potential for growth,” Mohamed told the Gazette. “It’s sort of the mirror image of (how cable evolved), which went from video, to data to voice.”

Nothing eats bandwidth like online video, and Rogers traditionally caps this and other usage on their mobile wireless network, citing spectrum and capacity shortages. But Rogers sees few impediments serving up certain kinds of online video: namely their own.

That’s not a message the company continues to deliver consumers on its “I Want My LTE” website, part of a robust lobbying effort to get its hands on as much new spectrum as possible, even if it means locking out would-be competitors.  In fact, leaving the impression the company has spectrum to spare is so politically dangerous, Mohamed took the wind out of his own announcement by mentioning, as an aside, their networks still don’t have enough capacity to deliver full-motion video to a large number of customers at the same time.

“I think wireless networks in the foreseeable future will not have the capability to deliver full-motion video to a large number of customers at the same time, even with LTE,” he said. “So what you will see is an integration of wired and wireless, where the wireless network will off-load the traffic to a wired network.”

Rogers’ decision to limit the service, both in scope and range, is also designed to protect itself (and other cable operators) from unnecessary competition.  Rogers won’t offer a full menu of video services outside of its traditional cable system areas in Ontario, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland, and only Quebec residents (where Rogers doesn’t sell cable TV) will have the option of signing up for the wireless video-on-demand service.

Currently there are 4 comments on this Article:

  1. ScytheNoire says:

    Why is this surprising? Data caps and throttling have always been about avoiding competition and nothing to do with the limit of hardware. They purposely slow things down to justify their lies. If they took a small percentage of their profits to improve infrastructure, things would be so much better. This is what you get with corporate telecom monopolies and why Canada fails so hard in the telecom industry.

    • Alex Perrier says:

      Cheaper TV isn’t new to Canada. Vidéotron did it in Québec, and now Bell has it wherever it or Telus have coverage. Their brand Virgin, too. The cost is $1 per hour, and assume for the benefit of the doubt that 1 hour = 1 GB. If i were to stream that same GB for non-Bell TV video, i would pay $30 for 6 GB, or $5 per GB. Of course, that’s a promotional price! Normally, their prices for 1 GB are simply ridiculous and non-affordable for regular use.

  2. Paul says:

    Go figure…..why am I not surprised…..

    Paul

  3. Leafs GM? says:

    Im kinda curious as to why you area customer with a company that you write about to mis informed Canadians that dont realize there are Indie ISP options out there im new to this sight so sorry if you have a valid reason that you support there caps and gauging by being a customer I myself am a Rogers wireless customer :( and have been for 13 years even when I drove north of hwy 7 and barely got signal ever and I lived north of hwy 7 but when my contracts up this time im not getting a new phone with them I always had great customer support but Nadmir Mohamed or if you in his entourage then Moham is running this once i believe respectable company into the likes of the Toronto Maple Leafs or Nortel its time for change in the Rogers top offices. And its not like he’ll be unemployed for to long just as Burkes plan is starting to fall in place MLSE will need a replacement before he makes the Leafs a succesful franchise.

    Say no to Bill C-10 cuz unless you never downloaded a song, then you would be an ex con.
    (Mandatory minimum jailtime sentences for first time theft under $5000 offenders no exceptions) Google “Bill C-10″ to see Canadas demise. They’ll be able to track and spy to get you in a cell to die,even for just petty theft under five, im kinda scared im gunna go cry, cuz i hear Bubbas a pretty mean guy, with atleast 12 inches on his right thigh, I wish i knew Canada got Spotify

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • JD: CLEAR has without a doubt been the absolute BEST internet service I’ve ever (and I’ve used several ISP’s since 1991) used, PERIOD!!! Will Sprint ...
  • Jason: I agree, cap to limit congestion is a lie. So with capping everyone you have high congestion for the first two weeks of the billing cycle then it fal...
  • Jason: I work from home and I'll be damned if they are going to charge me any fees or cap my usage. Just wait until Google fiber comes to Phoenix and the ex...
  • chris: was just curious to what cox had to say about all this cash cow bussiness and heres what they told me Thank you for choosing Cox Communications....
  • Joe V: I hope the people of New Jersey are happy. They voted for Chris Christie and this is exactly what they got....
  • Susan: After diligently watching my credit score for over a year and how negative as well as positive postings affect it, I have a hard time believing that o...
  • David Therchik: An intense investigation needs to put into this! As soon as one starts I bet they'll stop charging/cheating people from over usage. Before they bought...
  • Charles Bingham: I did but customer no service was no help - said it did no good to have pass word with symbols, cap and small letters and #'s. IF only I had an alte...
  • Phillip Dampier: That assumes this customer had access to a working usage meter and notification messages and ignored them. Evidently it was big enough of a problem fo...
  • Are you kidding me...: "Over the years" people are using the internet differently. If your bill went up, you have usage. Responsible would be calling and talking to them ab...
  • Charles Bingham: Actually my usage has decreased over the years as I sold my business and only kept the internet for a few tax returns that I still do, no employees no...
  • Are you kidding me...: This entire article reeks of "poor me, I'm a victim and I can't be responsible about my own Internet usage, my own bills or my own actions." Grow up....

Your Account: