This ad was ruled misleading by an Australian judge because it buries the extra costs in the fine print.

One of Australia’s largest Internet Service Providers used misleading advertising to offer “unlimited broadband” for $29.99AU that hid the extra costs that came with the deal.

TPG Internet is well-known across Australia, and the company pitched its unlimited offer across newspapers, television, radio, and even movie theaters.  Consumers were offered unlimited Internet access — still a rarity in Australia — for just over $31US a month.  But when those interested phoned up TPG, they found the great deal had some significant costs:

1. An installation fee of $129.95AU.
2. Consumers had to purchase a home phone rental agreement for an additional $30 a month.

Australian consumer law mandates that providers disclose any up front, required costs to take advantage of a promotion, and TPG blatantly disregarded the law, the justice found.

Justice Murphy said the dominant message of TPG’s ads was that consumers would only pay $29.99 a month, not a substantial setup fee and phone line rental that doubled the price.

The Federal Court justice added that the desire for unlimited Internet service was so great, consumers were likely to sign up for unlimited plans even if their monthly usage was low enough to save money with a usage-limited plan.

“There is a tendency in some consumers to purchase the biggest, the best, or the highest quality product or service, seemingly regardless of whether that service is appropriate to their needs,” Murphy ruled.

The judge plans to meet with the offending ISP to discuss an appropriate penalty for the breach in advertising standards regulations.

Frontier Communications continues to lose access line customers at a rate of 8.5 percent overall, 9.8 percent in the former Verizon service areas they acquired more than a year ago.  The company’s third quarter results show lackluster performance as revenue declines of 30 percent impacted both their residential and business customer units.

Company officials spent most of the question and answer session responding to Wall Street concerns about revenue, spending, promotions, customer churn, the company’s pension fund, and the outright defection of Frontier FiOS TV customers away from the fiber network the phone company inherited from Verizon.

Mike McCormack of Nomura Securities suggest the weak figures should concern investors because it may show Frontier unable to compete effectively with cable companies, which also offer phone service.

Frontier CEO Maggie Wilderotter put her best face forward trying to promote the company’s successes, particularly bringing DSL broadband to former Verizon service areas:

“Our broadband expansion reached an additional 126,000 new homes in the acquired properties during the quarter, bringing our year-to-date total to 352,000 which is on track to reach our 2011 goal of increasing broadband availability to more than 400,000 additional homes. Broadband availability in the acquired properties is now 80%, a significant increase from the mid-60% range when we acquired them. As a result of our expansion and sales efforts, we had a very strong quarter for broadband growth, adding 16,900 total DSL subscribers, a 38% sequential increase from Q2. We also added 2,300 wireless data customers. This growth reflected the effectiveness of our local engagement model, as well as organic demand for broadband in both legacy and acquired properties.

“We have also largely completed our efforts to migrate middle mile congestion, which now gives us the ability to more effectively market higher speeds in markets that were already enabled.”

Frontier executives sought to portray West Virginia as their biggest success story.

Daniel J. McCarthy, Frontier’s chief operating officer and executive vice-president, claims Frontier’s installation of 12 integrated fiber rings throughout the state provides broadband capacity and integrated network capability beyond what is available anywhere else in the United States from a state-wide perspective.  McCarthy claims Frontier is on track to turn West Virginia from one of the least connected states in the nation to one of the most connected.

But Margaret Kings from MacArthur, W.V. says she’ll believe it when she sees it, and she hasn’t seen it yet.

“My extended family has experienced endless problems dealing with Frontier in this state, and I have relatives in the Panhandle to boot,” Kings says. “We have collectively won more than $300 in service credits for out of service broadband and phone service, slow speeds when it rains, and missed appointments, billing errors, sneaky charges, and contract disputes.”

Kings’ immediate family left Frontier for Suddenlink more than a year ago when she moved.

“Why pay Frontier more for phone service and 1.7Mbps broadband when I can pay Suddenlink less for their phone service and 10Mbps Internet access,” she asks.

Frontier hopes to win back former customers with new broadband services, such as their newly-introduced “Second Connect” service, which delivers a second DSL line for existing broadband homes for what the company claims is $14.99 a month.  Frontier says a few thousand customers have signed up for the service, which is now being pitched aggressively by Frontier’s call centers.

But some customers who have signed up for the service are accusing Frontier of billing fraud for wildly misleading customers about the true cost of the service.

The $14.99 price tag Frontier advertises omits modem rental fees, taxes, surcharges, and other fees customers first discover on their monthly bill.

Chris Photoni discovered, after five calls and a combined two hours on hold, the true out-the-door price for Frontier Second Connect is actually $48 for him.  The Broadband Reports reader elaborates:

Don’t waste your time. Even after the ‘corrections’ the Second Connect line cost around $48. I say ‘around,’ [because] I haven’t met a staff member yet that could correctly calculate tax. How convenient for you Frontier. Their computer system can calculate it for your bill, but is unable to calculate it when inquiring about the service.

The new ‘taxes’ come to $27.64!

Frontier is one of the worst phone companies. They have terrible customer service, and the wait times usually seem to be 20-30 minutes per call. Most issues take at least THREE calls to resolve. I’ve actually have been on hold for 25 minutes as I’m writing this.

Kings said she wouldn’t have bothered inquiring about Second Connect in the first place.

“Let me understand this,” she writes. “The same phone company that offers 1.7Mbps to my house wants another $15 a month to ‘double my speed?’  I could pay $100 a month to Frontier for 3Mbps broadband along with my phone line or pay Suddenlink $100 for 10Mbps broadband, phone and cable-TV service.”

Other highlights from the conference call:

• Frontier is getting into the home security business in a two state trial with ADT and Protection 1.  Customers will be strongly encouraged to bundle the home security service with other telecommunications products to hold them in contracts and provide discounts up to 15 percent;
• Frontier will begin to resell AT&T wireless voice and data services in bundles with existing products. Frontier plans to trial this service during the first half of 2012 before expanding it nationally.  This service is only going to be available to bundled service customers.  Why customers wouldn’t pursue an agreement with AT&T themselves, without the phone company’s involvement, isn’t well-explained;
• The company plans no significant high-value promotional offers for the 4th quarter.  They didn’t pitch any during the 3rd quarter either.  Customers with pre-existing promotions, including “free satellite TV for 2011″ or “six months of free DSL” will find their bills rising considerably as those promotions expire in the next few months;
• Frontier’s pension plan is not in the best shape.  The company had to contribute $58 million of real estate to the plan fund to manage investment losses for the year;
• Frontier’s $500 FiOS installation fee has effectively kept new customers away from the fiber network.  Although the company claims it wants to maintain support for FiOS, video customers have left in droves and a smaller number of broadband customers have left as well, primarily for Comcast;
• Frontier plans to continue investment in its middle mile network to handle broadband traffic growth in 2012 and 2013.

Hurricane fast it isn't.

More than three and half million Americans are still paying AOL around $17.50 a month for painfully slow dial-up Internet access.

Long declared irrelevant by the technology elite, AOL continues to plod along with millions of customers more than a decade after the company stopped subsidizing the U.S. Postal Service with millions of sign-up disks mailed endlessly to American homes.

Among AOL’s holdout subscribers are the 7 percent of Americans who still believe dial-up is their best option.  Twenty percent of those surveyed by Pew Research said their commitment to dial-up was as sacred as their marriage vows, and nothing would get them to change.  But for most, the only things keeping them from throwing AOL under the bus are:

• The cost: Almost one-third of those surveyed cited the high cost of broadband as the primary reason for not signing up;
• Access: 17 percent are ready and willing, but their local providers are not.  Broadband is simply unavailable in many areas unserved by cable or deemed unprofitable by incumbent phone companies;
• Other Reasons: Almost 30% cited other reasons for not switching, with the most likely being they don’t know or understand their broadband options, they are getting free dial-up access and free is always good, or their local providers didn’t deliver reliable service.

AOL -is- still in business.  While it has been a long time since AOL’s glory years, when the company provided more than 26 million Americans their Internet access, the company still counts today’s 3.5 million users a win.  That may be true for those who don’t need more than basic “You’ve got mail!” service or those suffering from today’s difficult economy.  But cable operators and phone companies do offer price-sensitive dial-up customers a faster alternative.  It’s too bad they rarely bother to market it.

So-called “light user” plans that offer 640kbps-1.2Mbps speeds — much faster than dial-up but hardly “broadband” — are available for $15-26 a month.  For someone paying AOL $17.50, some of these services are more expensive, but probably still within reach when compared to the traditional $45 standard broadband account companies do advertise.  But too often, these budget plans are the best secret in town, under-marketed because of a fear existing broadband customers might seek savings by downgrading traditional (and more profitable) broadband service.

While you plod along with 3Mbps DSL service, an increasing number of British broadband users can now buy speeds up to 100Mbps.  Those speeds come increasingly from the deployment of fiber optics by cable competitor Virgin Media, which now reaches over 20 million residents with fiber-fast service.

The latest regions to be enabled for 100Mbps service include Harborne in Birmingham, Lincoln, Seven Kings in Greater London and Solihull.  Virgin said it will complete the roll out of 100Mbps service across the entire Virgin network by the middle of next year.

Virgin has attacked some of its competitors for promising fast speeds but never delivering them.  Oversold ADSL service has been an issue for many British households who are promised speeds of 10Mbps or better, only to discover speeds slowing to a crawl during peak usage periods.  Virgin says its fiber network has a level of capacity unprecedented in the United Kingdom and it can actually deliver sustained speeds to its customers day or night.

Efforts by British Telecom to improve its network are progressing with a fiber-to-the-neighborhood expansion project to handle increasing demand.  BT’s fiber network ends at street-side cabinets, where traditional copper telephone wiring delivers broadband to individual homes.  But BT’s broadband speeds are faster than what North Americans can purchase from similar networks like AT&T U-verse and Bell’s Fibe.  Current top speeds of 40/10Mbps have been declared inadequate, so the British phone company is planning to double them by early next year.

Faster speeds are always welcomed by customers.  Virgin notes over half of their customers purchase speeds of 30Mbps or faster.  BT’s move to supply 80/20Mbps broadband to customers will help keep the phone company competitive.

“It will provide a further boost for local businesses and homeworkers as well as families and other people for whom the internet has become an essential part of their daily lives – whether it’s for leisure, education or business,” said Brendan Dick, director of BT Scotland.

Cablevision Systems may be engaged in a long term effort to position itself for a sale, some New York investment firms have come to believe.  The most likely buyer?  Time Warner Cable.

The bulk of Cablevision’s assets are located in several boroughs of New York, Long Island, New Jersey and Connecticut.  Virtually all of their service areas, outside of the acquisition of Bresnan Cable in the mountain west, are adjacent to Time Warner, making an acquisition by the nation’s second largest cable operator a natural fit.

This isn’t the first time rumors of a Cablevision sale have been floated.  The Dolan family has run the cable operator for decades, with family patriarch Charles Dolan still controlling a sizable interest in the company.  Barron’s notes the senior Dolan is currently in his 80s.  Son James, current president and CEO of Cablevision, seems more interested in his leadership role at Madison Square Garden, spun-off from Cablevision last year.

“I think the Dolans have positioned the company for a sale,” Mark Boyar, who heads Boyar Asset Management, told Barron’s.

Boyar points to Cablevision’s ongoing efforts to minimize their involvement in side businesses, such as MSG and cable networks like AMC, spun away from Cablevision on June 30.

Buyers like transactions to be simple and straightforward, and Cablevision’s operations increasingly meet both standards.

On its own, Cablevision’s growth opportunities come mostly from rate increases, which subscribers routinely complain about.  The company already enjoys the highest penetration rate among major cable operators and the highest average monthly revenue per subscriber — $150 a month vs. $113 for Time Warner Cable.  With a depressed economy and fierce competition from Verizon FiOS, growing the business (and the stock price) has become increasingly difficult in a maturing industry unlikely to attract new subscribers.

Among the only prospects for subscriber growth on the horizon comes from satellite TV subscribers.  But that alone may not be enough to keep investors satisfied, much less excited.  A sale could bring shareholders a massive return on their investment, particularly if a bidding war breaks out between likely buyers Time Warner Cable and Comcast.  Shareholders ultimately own the company, and should the Dolan family lose their love affair with cable, Cablevision and their subscribers will likely find themselves on the auction block.

Windstream disappointed Wall Street Friday when it reported a 16 percent income drop for the third quarter of the year, surprising investors who expected more from the Little Rock, Ark. phone company.

Windstream is attempting a makeover as it attempts to shed its image as a residential landline service provider for brighter prospects delivering business telecommunications services.  But shareholders weren’t impressed as company officials noted the company has increased spending on capital projects like data centers and wiring cell phone towers with fiber optics and the $840 million acquisition of Fairport, N.Y.-based PAETEC Holding Corporation.

Most of Windstream’s successes are tied to the company’s business products and services.  The company reported growth selling advanced Internet products to corporate customers, including virtual LAN services and dedicated Internet access.  A considerable amount of the company’s Internet revenue growth is coming from data center services such as webhosting and wireless backhaul circuits sold to cell phone providers.

Windstream’s residential customers can be split into two groups: traditional landline users who are increasingly disconnecting their service and those who are buying DSL service to accompany their existing phone line.  Windstream reported another 4.6% of their residential customers permanently disconnected service this year.  Windstream’s largely rural customer base has remained more loyal and the company added an additional 8,000 DSL customers during the quarter, a growth of 4.4%.  Windstream’s penetration rate for broadband among their landline customers is 65%.

Keeping broadband customers loyal to DSL requires regular service improvements to avoid customer poaching by cable competitors, and Windstream is attempting to keep up with a $40 million investment to improve broadband speeds, including the introduction of advanced VDSL service in selected areas.

Whittington

“We increased broadband speeds to residential and business customers that can now offer 12Mbps service to over 40% of our footprint and 24Mbps service in our most competitive markets,” said Windstream chief operating officer Brent K. Whittington. “We expanded our Raleigh data center to increase the floor space by 10,000 square feet to keep up with the rapidly growing customer base and demand for cloud-based services.”

Whittington notes customers that hunger for faster broadband speeds are using them largely to watch online video, and Windstream has begun marketing campaigns targeting video-hungry customers.  Customers using the Internet for basic web browsing and e-mail are not very interested in paying more for faster service, however.

“Customers still don’t want to pay incrementally for higher speed services,” Whittington said. “We try to position Windstream as all the speed you need, which is really trying to help make sure customers understand our parity with cable as it pertains to speeds because some of the perceptions around traditional ADSL services, they’ve used against us, and that’s working for us. But again, customers really just, we find, don’t want to spend a lot more for incremental speeds. We see that as revenue upside in the future, but not seeing a great deal of demand there right now.”

While Windstream customers will likely find current product pricing stable over the coming year, the FCC’s recent approval of Universal Service Fund (USF) reform does allow the phone company to raise rates on customers.  Some Wall Street investment firms have suggested Windstream do precisely that to boost revenues.

Timothy Horan from Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. noted Windstream’s local rates seem low.

“I don’t think they’ve been raised for a long period of time,” Horan observed. “I think you have to go through some [state regulators], but can you do that without having rate cases, and is that part of the plan at all?”

Anthony W. Thomas, Windstream’s chief financial officer, tried to put Horan at east.

“The FCC has provided a mechanism, it is our understanding, in the order that will allow us to pass along price increases up to $0.50 per month to our customers over a 5-year period,” Thomas explained.

The nationwide outage lasted just a few minutes for some, about 20 minutes for others.

Time Warner Cable customers across the country noticed a nationwide outage of the cable company’s broadband service this morning.

Customers from New York to California to Texas first noticed the outage at around 9am EST, which appeared to first affect the company’s DNS servers, but attempts to switch to other DNS providers only worked briefly before they began to fail as well.  Inbound and outbound traffic was impacted.

The outage lasted approximately 20 minutes for customers relying on Time Warner’s DNS servers and just a few minutes for those who don’t.  Thanks to Stop the Cap! reader Tom for dropping us a note and letting us know.  We already knew — Stop the Cap! HQ is powered by Time Warner Cable broadband and it was out of service here in Rochester, N.Y. as well.

The company acknowledged the “large but brief Internet outage affecting most of our service areas” and requested customers still impacted reboot their cable modems.  That’s advice unlikely to help those who can’t access the Internet to read those instructions, however.

Because the outage lasted less than one hour, and only a few minutes for many, customers are not entitled to service credits this time.

It could be worse.  Some AT&T and Cablevision customers in parts of Connecticut are expecting to be without Internet or cable service for as long as two weeks after the snow storm that struck the area Oct. 29-30, bringing down utility poles and cable lines.

At least 50,000 people in the Nutmeg State have begun their second week without electricity as Connecticut Light and Power missed their self-imposed deadline to get the lights back on by midnight last night.  Power isn’t expected to be fully restored until Wednesday.  Cable and telephone crews cannot begin repair efforts until electrical service is up and running.

Now selling for the "go away" price of $500 for installation.

Frontier Communications has proven it can successfully herd customers off the award-winning advanced fiber network it inherited from Verizon Communications just by increasingly gouging customers until they call and cancel.

The phone company reports success in ridding itself of 9,900 FiOS TV customers in the third quarter alone, and 3,100 FiOS Internet customers left with them in Indiana and Oregon.

Frontier CEO Maggie Wilderotter and other company executives made it known last spring that FiOS fiber optics was the unwanted stepchild best left forgotten when telling investors the company considered the fiber network unprofitable.  The company has since taken to hike rates and raised the price for service installation to as much as $500.  The combined increases have made the cable competition — Comcast — blush and look downright cheap by comparison.

Where did Frontier’s customers go?  Several left for Comcast, but others were persuaded to switch to an aggressively-priced satellite TV promotion, at least until it expires.  Frontier added 12,200 satellite subscriptions nationwide last quarter and 16,200 new DSL customers, many in ex-Verizon service areas that currently have no other choice for broadband.

Verizon employees in upstate New York are joining the “Occupy” movement that began protesting Wall Street, but has since broadened to include criticism of some of America’s largest corporations.  Company employees are arriving at “Occupy” protests holding signs attacking the company for “destroying the middle class” through job and benefit cuts.  The protests are also impacting cable operators.  Several arrests were made this week by protestors at Comcast headquarters in Philadelphia.  Most of the protestors are concerned about jobs and the pervasive influence corporate lobbyists have on American public policy.  WBNG in Binghamton covers the protests against Verizon.  (2 minutes)

(Courtesy: Glasbergen)

Shaw Cable customers in Langley and Aldergrove, B.C., waited as long as four hours on hold to speak to a customer service representative trying to learn when their cable and broadband service would be restored after vandals cut a fiber line.

Days later, hundreds of customers were still without service… and answers.

“When I called [Shaw], I was told there was a four-hour wait to talk to customer service,” area resident Candace Hopkins told CBC News.

That four hour hold time was hardly an isolated case.  Several CBC viewers reported similar experiences, and many simply gave up calling even though their cable service was out for days.

Shaw Cable suspects the vandals were would-be copper thieves, unhappy to discover their efforts would only net them fiber optic cables which have almost no resale value.  But customers suspect the cable cuts have not been a priority for Shaw, leaving customers in the dark about when service would be restored.

CBC News called Shaw customer service and only managed to get a recording, which said nothing about how large the problem was or when it would be fixed, saying only that some service was restored and crews were working on the rest.

Other calls to Shaw’s media relations department from CBC News have not been returned.

Shaw customers are not amused, invading the company’s Twitter account with repeated complaints. Other outages have left customers with similar experiences.  One customer on the Outer Gulf Islands told he’d be waiting up to four hours for help managed to leave his number for a call back.

“The kicker is that after about four hours we received a call from something approximating Shaw,” the customer explains. “I believe that it was a call center in India. To add insult to injury, the voice on the other end of the phone line told me that everything was fine with my line. And, it was. Service had been restored 10 minutes before the call back. When I tried to explain this and asked what the earlier service disruption was about, the voice on the line simply kept repeating that everything was fine on my line.”

Shaw’s hold times are infamous in western Canada.  It is not uncommon to wait at least an hour to speak to a customer service representative as we reported back in September.  Some customers find it quicker to drive to the nearest cable office to arrange for service calls or manage their accounts.  So far, Canadian regulators have done little to pressure Shaw into making improvements.

When service was restored, some customers were brave enough to call Shaw to request outage credits.  “A big mistake,” shares one of our readers.

“The automated voice said there was a two hour hold time and when I finally got through, I was told I couldn’t get a credit because I didn’t report the outage during the outage,” says Stop the Cap! reader Jules who shared this story over his restored Internet service in Aldergrove.

“They didn’t seem to have a good answer when I suggested how difficult that would have been since it took out my Shaw telephone line as well. I got my credit.”