Home » Competition »Consumer News »Frontier »Internet Overcharging »Rural Broadband » Currently Reading:

Frontier Adds New $1.50 Surcharge to Broadband Bills; Customers Told It Will Improve Service

Phillip Dampier August 23, 2011 Competition, Consumer News, Frontier, Internet Overcharging, Rural Broadband 8 Comments

Frontier Communications is adding a new $1.50 monthly surcharge for broadband customers not currently enrolled in a “price protection agreement.”  Labeled the HSI Surcharge, the new fee started showing up on customer bills this month, with only a vague explanation buried inside the bill:

Courtesy: Manmaniac

Frontier's Fast One.

Customers attempting to get an explanation of what this charge was all about got a myriad of answers from Frontier customer service representatives:

  • It’s a broadband tax;
  • It’s a surcharge to help pay for network improvements;
  • It’s a charge for customers who refuse to take a price protection plan;
  • It’s a rate increase.

Stop the Cap! called Frontier this afternoon and was told it was designed to collect additional revenue to fund network expansion and was, effectively a rate increase.  Even customers on 1-3 year price protection agreements will eventually pay the “surcharge” as their agreements expire.  It is not a government-mandated charge or tax.

Effectively, this rate increase allows the company to advertise their Internet service at a deceptively low price, until customers discover Frontier’s modem rental fees and surcharges.  In 2009, during Stop the Cap!‘s flirtation with Frontier DSL, we found the “out the door” price for their 3.1Mbps service was actually higher than that charged by Time Warner Cable’s 10Mbps Road Runner service.

Currently there are 8 comments on this Article:

  1. Elena says:

    We have to stop these stealing as Frontier will continue to do so in the future!!!

  2. Annie says:

    And even if you have what you think is a price protection plan, they can add this surcharge to your bill. Two and half years ago I signed up for an internet package with a price guaranteed for life, but because of the fine print that says the guaranteed price doesn’t include taxes or surcharges, Frontier effectively raised the cost of my service. I know Frontier/Verizon was losing money on FIOS — is this their way of recouping some of that?

  3. Dave says:

    Thanks for this article, STC. I’ve been in an exchange of views with Frontier’s office at 41st St. in Everett, WA.

    Here’s the fifth excuse for the HSI surcharge: “The official reason is this: This pass thru surcharge on High Speed Internet service is due to increased costs brought on by the rapid volume growth of services like internet video.” That’s an exact quote from someone in the Customer Relations/GM Partnership Team, who also offered up a ‘but we’re not as bad as Comcast’ argument. Great way to make the sale, eh?

    $1.50 times unknown tens of thousands of customers is substantial. I won’t have it. My account is set to close in several days. Until people are prepared to 1) close their accounts and 2) do so in cooperation as publicly as possible, this will continue. I’ll be checking for follow-up comments, in case there’s an appetite for a larger response.

  4. Dave says:

    The class-action lawsuit is in Minnesota. Here’s the link.
    http://enterpriseitexperts.com/customers-sue-frontier-over-broadband-surcharge/

  5. Julia says:

    We have to stop this junk fee. If we don’t, frontier will continue to charge more under the name “state taxes and other charges”!!

  6. john says:

    I know its an all post but it is the current top list for “hsi surcharge” searches.

    Just talked to a frontier rep “it is a federal fee mandatory for all internet subscribers”
    The modem rental fee is mandatory from Frontier regardless if you have your own modem or use theirs.

    • They are wrong. There is no federally mandated HSI surcharge. In fact, the only federally mandated fee is the one that funds the Universal Service Fund, which is now being reformed to help divert money to rural broadband.

      Frontier is charging just another bill-padding junk fee on their customers, just like the always-increasing “modem rental fee.”

      It is why I don’t recommend Frontier products to my friends and family. They deliver lower speeds and charge higher out the door prices than the local cable company. It just makes so sense to do business with them.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Elbert Davis: This is absolutely breathtaking in regards to the arrogance of the bill. Byron and the lobbyists/monopolies left absolutely nothing to chance. Kudos...
  • Roger: I wasn't aware of Esquire being spawned from Style, but I do remember that it was positioned as the replacement for G4, which catered to those interes...
  • Paul Houle: My take is that a "wireless recession" will soon be at hand. There are a number of stories talked about on this site that, I think, are connected w...
  • Keanyn Gray: frontier every month for the last 8 month for incorrect bills amounts, each time they tell me they will correct credit my bills to the agreed amount ...
  • JayS: Channels, before they were removed from Tv and used to start the cellular telephone networks, went up to 83. Due to technology limitations, UHF (...
  • Josh: As near as I can tell we've had broadcast TV spectrum stolen from us TWICE. (Once during the NTSC to ATSC transition, but apparently once before that...
  • Phillip Dampier: The retention staff in Syracuse actually stopped handling those types of calls in early 2016 and referred everyone to the national customer retention ...
  • T Nelson: I am a Twc customer in the Rochester, NY area. In November my special promotion program ran out. In the past I had dealt with a retention specialist...
  • Milan Gohil: Thank you for publicizing my ordeal, Phillip! I hope this report opens the eyes of consumers and Spectrum executives!...
  • LG: They should be taken into Federal receivership. They only care about cell phones, so we need to take that away from them. Make it a requirement to m...
  • Joe V: Six months ago I moved from San Francisco to southeastern Massachusetts 30 miles south from Boston. It is pathetic that on one side of my town they ...
  • Matt K: Does that 23% on fiber count only true FTTH or are they also counting crap like AT&T's Uverse?...

Your Account: