Home » AT&T »Broadband Speed »Cable One »Charter Spectrum »Clearwire »Comcast/Xfinity »Consumer News »Cox »Editorial & Site News »Frontier »Online Video »Rural Broadband »TWC (see Charter) »Verizon » Currently Reading:

Frontier: America’s Worst Wired ISP for Netflix Viewing (Second Time Winner!)

Click to Enlarge

Frontier Communications’ DSL service delivers abysmal results for customers looking for quality time with Netflix.  For the second quarter running, the independent phone company’s ability to keep up with Netflix’s high quality video is about on par with a garden slug in a triathlon — yes, it may eventually reach the finish line, but you’ll be dead before it happens.  Even more embarrassing for Frontier, their service is occasionally beaten by Clearwire, a wireless ISP with a bandwidth throttler that can reduce your online experience to the painful days of dial-up if deemed to be using “too much.”

“Frontier sucks,” writes Stop the Cap! reader Doug in Charleston, W.V. “After they took over where Verizon fled, my ability to watch Netflix online became a source of endless frustration, so now I limit myself to mailing DVD’s back and forth.”

Remarkably, Charter Cable, which does poorly in customer satisfaction surveys, is again the runaway winner, followed by Comcast, the heavily usage-capped Cable One, Time Warner Cable, and Cox.  Verizon and AT&T only deliver middling performance.

Currently there are 10 comments on this Article:

  1. DJ says:

    I’m not shocked by this at all.

    Also, remember back when Frontier promised 5Mb to some of us in W.Va by February 17th? Well, it’s now June, almost July and nothing has changed.

    I’ve emailed the W.Va Frontier reps countless times and just get ignored.

    This is seriously the most useless company I’ve seen.

  2. jr says:

    Frontier thinks you’re spoiled if you want to do anything but read text online

  3. Welp says:

    Emm… why Time Warner? They offer packages that far exceed the mandatory 6 Mbps requirement for Netflix HD streaming in every market.

    This is the dumbest survey I’ve seen. TWC is (for now) one of the remaining ISPs with no bandwidth caps. This really isn’t very reflective on what ISP is truly best for Netflix. Also according to that picture TWC has the 4th highest speed.

  4. Smith6612 says:

    It would probably help the Telephone companies out a bit if they offered speeds that went over 3Mbps on their DSL products, along with building out Fiber networks. There’s no getting around the DSL Speed < Distance limitation, which is probably why they have lower speeds, but even then, everyone could do better.

    I'm not sure if it's also been mentioned, but often times watching the lowest quality stream tends to skew the results too. I see it with YouTube where super fast connections buffer up a video instantly but get rate throttled on the server end to a very low speed.

    • Netflix is mostly measuring the quality of ISPs backbone connections. Frontier’s 1-3Mbps rural DSL speeds are part of the problem, but their backbone connections are creating the lousy results you see on that chart.

  5. Brett says:

    Welp,

    I believe you read the above as “Second Time Warner” and not “Second Time WINNER.” I, too, made this mistake until looking at the graph and realizing my error. While I think Time Warner speeds are disgraceful, especially in my area, you are correct in saying they offer speeds sufficient for
    Netflix HD, without caps.

    -Brett

    • I never thought people would read it that way, but I guess now I can see how you could misinterpret Winner for Warner. 🙂

      My bigger point was to note Frontier has been a flop ever since Netflix began releasing this chart. Time Warner, as the article text notes, does pretty well with Netflix. I have had almost no troubles using them myself.

  6. Baxter says:

    I for one is really surprised that suddenlink is doin this good, ive never had a problem yet really, i do fear the caps more than anything especially the ones they where thinkin about implimenting 31gb….come on now thats crap

    but im glad to see the company stayin on par with the top other companys. AT&T rateing and Frontiers is not surprising at all, of course

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • chickenpatti13: I'm not going to be upset over loosing favorite channels.Once upon a time,there was no TV.I'll use all that free time to expand my farm.You can't wear...
  • DCUNY: 113/12 now in area of Hilton, NY. Was 70/6 last year or so....
  • Daniel Haro: no WORRIES FOR US IN San Antonio TX. Google FIBER HAS LAUNCH SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO MOST OF San Antonio IN THE COMING MONTHS. WeCAN FINAL DITCH THIS P...
  • bc: woke up to 130/15 speeds this morning batavia ny 14020...
  • Racerbob: Confirmed upgrade here in West Webster. 60/5 is now 100/10 for me. http://beta.speedtest.net/result/6880083440.png...
  • Fred Pilot: Interesting that "the Internet" is still discussed as if it's something new circa early 1990s when in fact it's been widely available for some number ...
  • Don: I just got off the phone with Spectrum and I asked about the small speed increase. He said that I am part of the new lift area. He said that in my are...
  • Racerbob: A friend here in Webster started seeing 150 Mbps download speed yesterday. A chat with Spectrum today told him that more speed would be seen next week...
  • Don: I'm in Gates, New York and I'm on the ultra plan and my speeds were around 117/11.5 but now are showing around 141/11.5 but not sure why. The speed re...
  • Reuben Mahar: New Speeds are online in Waldoboro Maine. 04572. Testing at 112 x 11. I wonder if this has anything to do with LCI offering fiber in my area,,,,, ...
  • Peggy: Sorry to tell you but they set up the account based on your address, not your name. And the other thing is, it does depend not only on your address bu...
  • EJ: I am curious to see the specifics of this "DEAL". How bulletproof does this need to be, how much redundancy does there need to be, who decides what an...

Your Account:

%d bloggers like this: