Home » Canada »Data Caps »Editorial & Site News »Rogers » Currently Reading:

Usage Cappers Suggest You Become Traffic Cop to Keep Their Profiteering to a Minimum

Phillip Dampier April 12, 2011 Canada, Data Caps, Editorial & Site News, Rogers 4 Comments

Should any family have to fight over the monthly Internet bill?

One of the side effects of Internet Overcharging is the one-two punch of the usage cap combined with a steep overlimit penalty.  While usage capping providers pay pennies for your Internet traffic, they can charge you up to $10/GB if you dare exceed your plan allowance.

Making sure you don’t… too much… is the job of the provider who will helpfully educate you on how to use your service less, how to establish an in-home Ministry for State Security — tracking down those malfeasant family members who want to deny running the bill up, and providing inaccurate monitoring tools designed to make you think twice about everything you do online.

Far-fetched?

Not really.  Just ask Mathew Ingram, a Rogers Cable customer in Ontario who tells Techdirt he spends much of his free time trying to figure out who is doing what with the family broadband account:

I have three teenage daughters who also download music, TV shows and so on. I figured someone had just gone a little overboard, and since it was close to the end of the month, I thought it wasn’t anything to be worried about. The next day, however, I went online and checked my usage (Rogers has an online tool that shows daily usage), and it said that I had used 121 GB more than my allotted amount for the month. In other words, I had used more than 100 GB in less than two days.

I just about spit my coffee all over the computer screen. How could I possibly have used that much? According to Rogers, I owed $181 in overage charges. Luckily there is a maximum extra levy of $50 a month (just think what it would cost if I was subject to usage-based billing).

With the help of Rogers (who also helped themselves to $50 of Ingram’s money for overlimit fees), an employee identified security holes in his wireless router which could have let all the neighbors join the broadband usage party at his expense.  But in reality, after considerable family tension and drama, one of Ingram’s daughters confessed to downloading some TV shows and forgot to close the file sharing software used to grab them.

Ingram learned a $50 (this month) lesson — he is not free to sit back and enjoy his broadband account that costs him much more than American providers charge for the same thing (without a usage cap).  He serves at the pleasure of Rogers Cable, who wins if Ingram succeeds in keeping his family’s usage under the limit — costing Rogers less money, or by pocketing the overlimit fees charged when he fails.

What scares many Canadians are plans by some providers to eliminate the monthly maximum overlimit fee.  That would have left Ingram paying a $181 penalty instead of $50.  As far as cable companies like Rogers are concerned, it’s his own fault for not keeping his family under control, and now he will pay the price.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shell
Shell
13 years ago

This is an old story for those of us who’ve had to depend on satellite internet. It’s marketed for home use, but at $70 for a 7.5G cap it’s a costly headache and hassle. There’s a big “mental tax” involved in regulating home use when you have several computers and wireless devices, and I was designated FAP Cop. It’s a miserable job where you pay to be a network gatekeeper and cause family strife. You do get creative in ways to cut use. Unplugging the modem at night, outlawing the use of Youtube, graphics-heavy sites, tailoring email not to download… Read more »

jr
jr
13 years ago

How about a salary cap for telecom CEOs

Scott
Scott
13 years ago
Reply to  jr

Cable/Telco Executive Metered Salary Cap Plan: Any executive with a salary or compensation over $300,000.00 with be charged $20,000 a year in overage fee’s for every $100,000.00 over in salary they go. The money collected to alleviate payroll hogs and salary congestion from too much cash will then be allocated to public work projects expanding fiber optic lines in their respective cities. That’s about as fair as their cap and penalty plans go, if not more fair. At least they can rest easy as they’re probably only paying an effective tax rate of 17% or so vs the rest of… Read more »

me
me
13 years ago

While I think caps suck. I think they are a fact of life for many (such as Shell). I dont have any, but I am preparing for the worst. Perhaps we could dedicate part of this site to helping mitigate some of the effects of it. I personally use a squid caching server and a local dns server. I do this mostly for the speed boost (3-5% would be better on something like a satellite system). But it saves me on average 5% of my traffic. If I were to really tweak it i probably could get much higher rates.… Read more »

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!