Home » Bresnan »Cablevision »Consumer News »Video » Currently Reading:

Radio Shack Store in Montana Gives Away Free Gun With Every Satellite TV Purchase

Phillip Dampier March 30, 2011 Bresnan, Cablevision, Consumer News, Video 2 Comments

A Radio Shack store in Hamilton, Montana has come up with a novel way to pitch satellite dishes to local residents — include a free gun with every purchase.

Actually, it’s not a promotion sanctioned by Radio Shack, and DISH Network has nothing to say about the promotion either.  It was the idea of store owner Steve Strand, who runs S&S Electronics, authorized to do business under the Radio Shack brand.

Strand says new DISH customers get their choice of either a Hi-Point 380c-p pistol or a Baikal MP-18 20 GA shotgun.  If guns are not your thing, Strand will give you a $50 gift card for the local Pizza Hut instead.

Strand’s store serves Missoula and the Bitterroot Valley — regions that are served by Bresnan Cable, now owned by Cablevision.  Stories about Bresnan on Stop the Cap! always elicit plenty of response… about how darn lousy the service is.  So satellite television, especially outside of Bresnan’s service area, is the only real option for many residents.

Giving away a gun with every purchase may raise eyebrows among many, but for most Montanans, it’s no big deal.  And when you call, S&S tells visitors to their promotional website there is never a need to press “1” for English.  “We are American and we speak English,” boasts the site.

[flv width=”640″ height=”380″]http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/CNN Guns in Country 3-30-11.flv[/flv]

CNN interviewed store owner Bill Strand about his unique promotion — a free gun with every satellite TV purchase.  (3 minutes)

Currently there are 2 comments on this Article:

  1. rasqual says:

    Gun shop PBTC: “Well I think in urban areas the perspective is, the only people who have guns are bad people. You never hear about a good citizen armed with a gun who’s stopped a crime; you only hear about the criminal who’s shot someone.”

    Give that man a cookie.

    I’m an expat from the libertarian state SD, stuck for years, now, in the bizarre world of Chicago. It’s true. Urban folk seem conditioned by a couple things, at least.

    First, there’s television programming and hip hop, whose mythology of guns is the sole source of youthful “knowledge” about them. Then when youth adopt these mythologies, adults are alarmed and, insanely opting into the mythologies, blame the guns.

    Second, there’s what the PBTC above cited — how in a city that disarms its law-abiding citizens, the news is always about law-abiding people (often children) getting shot by those who use weapons in violation of the law. The mentality of those who show their acceptance of such a state of affairs (by continuing to elect Daley, for example) eventually is, indeed, conditioned by the news — gun users are bad people! Ergo, gun users everywhere are bad people!

    The provincial ignorance of urban sophisticates is astonishing. Back in the 90s I walked into an urban pet store one time with my kids. They had prairie dogs. Cute things — but doubtful as pets, IMO. The store was charging over $300 for the things.

    Only an urban yokel would pay $300+ for a varmint my fellow South Dakotans sometimes pay others to rid them of.

    Only an urban yokel would be unnerved by this news story from Montana.

    • This urban yokel isn’t unnerved. My assumption is that most people in Montana that own guns use them as a pest-control tool or for sport. The rest are criminals and/or candidates for Darwin Awards. Maybe one day if I move to Montana, I’ll need a gun (there are a lot of dangerous cans and bottles sitting on fences) to enhance my “lifestyle.” In that case, I’ll probably seek proper training, since I don’t have an Uncle Earl.

      Much is made of the guns in the CNN piece. Googling around, they appear to retail for around $100. One is a low-end American gun, the other is a probably-not-so-great Russian import (what, not an ‘merican gun?!). One presumes they don’t actually cost $50, or if they do, they are a loss leader for bullets. More interesting to me was the *other* option– $50 worth of crappy pizza. For that price, you can get three Ultimate Stuffed Crusts and some flavored fizzy sugar-water to wash it down. The cardiac arrest is free.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Denise Rupert: Class action??...
  • Paul Houle: WatchTV legitimizes the idea of unbundling local channels from cable channels and it is about time. For many consumers, retransmission is a waste, ...
  • Paul Houle: I can believe in AT&T's plan, but not Comcast. For better or worse, AT&T is going "all in" on video and is unlike other major providers in ...
  • Phillip Dampier: Yes, that battle with Northwest Broadcasting, which also involved stations in Idaho-Wyoming and California, was the nastiest in recent history, with s...
  • Doug Stoffa: Digital takes up way less space than old analog feeds - agreed. In a given 6 MHz block, the cable company can send down 1 NTSC analog station, 2-4 HD...
  • Phillip Dampier: Digital video TV channels occupy next to nothing as far as bandwidth goes. Just look at the huge number of premium international channels loading up o...
  • Doug Stoffa: It's a bit more complicated than that. Television stations (and the networks that provide them programming) have increased their retransmission fees ...
  • Alex sandro: Most of the companies offer their services with contracts but Spectrum cable company offer contract free offers for initial year which is a very good ...
  • John: I live in of the effected counties, believe it or not our village is twenty three miles from WSKG Tower, approxiamately eighty miles from Syracuse, WS...
  • Wilhelm: I'm in the Finger Lakes where Spectrum removed WROC-8 last Fall, but we still get other Rochester channels, WHAM-13, WHEC-10 and WXXI-21. I have to wo...
  • dhkjsalhf: "Another classic case of businesses being much smarter than governments." I don't know whether this was sarcastic or not, but I feel it's a sentiment...
  • New Yorker: It makes no sense. I wonder sometimes if raising the limits on how much money rich people giving to candidates could make it more expensive to buy of...

Your Account: