Home » Consumer News »Online Video » Currently Reading:

Time Warner Cable Tries to Get Rid of the Set Top Box: IPTV for Samsung/Sony TV’s

Phillip Dampier January 14, 2011 Consumer News, Online Video 3 Comments

One of the biggest impediments to freeing up space on cable television systems is the amount of analog television programming viewers still watch over televisions not connected to set top boxes.  Time Warner Cable customers, already weary from paying $7 or more a month per television to rent digital boxes could eventually be in luck, if they own certain televisions made by Sony or Samsung.

The cable operator announced at this year’s Consumer Electronics Show it would begin testing delivering cable television directly to some television sets equipped to receive the Internet.

Time Warner Cable’s test of IPTV would deliver the cable lineup over its broadband network, which removes the need for an expensive and unsightly cable box.

Since the cable company would only deliver the channels customers were authorized to receive, boxes with complicated digital tuners and encryption schemes would be unnecessary.  For the first time in years, consumers could once again get the full cable lineup just by plugging a single cable into the back of their television.  No boxes, no TV set remotes rendered useless, no cableCARDs, and no more tangled cables behind the set.

The company could also eventually dump their DVR boxes, which require regular service to maintain and replace worn out hard drives.  The future of DVR’s is “cloud storage,” — your recordings would be stored at the cable company on their equipment, ready for on-demand access.

Could the days of the set top box be numbered?

The new IPTV service can also deliver advanced graphics and provide better on-screen programming guides, and even open up the potential to integrate Internet applications with the television experience.

IPTV already exists today with AT&T’s U-verse, which delivers all of its video programming over the same bandwidth their phone and broadband services rely on.  But U-verse still has a box attached to each television in the home.

Consumers could end up saving plenty if they got rid of expensive rented cable equipment.

But there are some downsides — the biggest being the currently limited number of televisions equipped to handle Time Warner’s proposed implementation of IPTV.

IPTV has often also opened the door to concerns from content producers about stream security — could a consumer capture perfect digital copies of movies over the cable company’s IPTV network?  And what happens politically if the cable company tries to deliver unlimited cable TV over the same broadband network it tried to limit in the past.

Cable providers and phone companies are trying to keep video subscribers happy in hopes they won’t drop service.  Comcast and Time Warner Cable both announced last week they are trying to build virtual cable systems that would deliver their channel lineups live to tablet computers, starting over home Wi-Fi networks.  Verizon and AT&T are also working on similar features.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Big Dan
13 years ago

It’s nice to see some forward thinking by Time Warner. As I understand it those of us with Digital Cable boxes are already essentially watching IPTV. The boxes are assigned an external IP address and digital programming is sent as a stream of 1s and 0s. What’s the real difference between that and IPTV, schematics? Let’s start thinking about the millions in rental fees the cable cos are going to lose by giving up boxes. How are they going to recoup that? The easiest way is to charge per TV (by MAC address). This screws the customer in the long… Read more »

me
me
13 years ago
Reply to  Big Dan

It depends on cost really. I remember for many years they had set top boxes before. Then cable ready tvs came out. Less time to setup in a customer houses, less truck rolls, less frustrated customer calls, less touch every box on upgrades. So there *is* an upside to push the ‘my tv does not work’ out to sony and samsung. You can hire people who are not as skilled (lower cost). A monopoly/oligopoly will set its price to maximize profit. In some cases that does mean lowering the cost of something. It is rare though. Also the easy way… Read more »

neil2047
neil2047
12 years ago

i own a samsung tv internet built in and 3d enabled but i cant damm well use it as virgin cap my broadband until after 9pm perhaps later so instaed of 10mb i sometimes get 2.4mb upshot is it buggers up internet tv /3d tv viewing over the net as buffering all the time not equipment my end just them messing with my speeds etc! so until they improve their service if ever no internet tv for me! im not prepared to pay 45 quid plus tv licence fee to have tv pics that freeze and stop and start ,… Read more »

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

Your Account:

Stop the Cap!