Home » AT&T »Consumer News »Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging »Video »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

AT&T Advertises “New” Family Data Plan That Isn’t: Same Overcharging Scheme, New Name

Phillip Dampier January 13, 2011 AT&T, Consumer News, Editorial & Site News, Internet Overcharging, Video, Wireless Broadband No Comments

AT&T claims every family should have access on the go, which is why they are “introducing” Smartphone data plans for the family.  Only one problem.  There is nothing new about the data plan, which still starts at $15 per month, per line, for up to 200MB of usage.

AT&T changed the plan’s name, but left the same high price in place.  An Internet Overcharging scheme is still an Internet Overcharging scheme no matter how a wireless company pitches it.

The plan, which throws in AT&T Wi-Fi, which customers can also already get, “is designed for families that primarily surf the web, send and receive personal email and visit social networking sites,” says AT&T spokeswoman Mari Melguizo.

But a real data plan for families would let every user on the account share from one data plan, billed once on the account, not per phone.  That’s not on offer from AT&T, although analysts predict the next wave of smartphone upgrades will come only when data pricing comes down, especially on accounts with multiple phones.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/ATT Family Smartphone Data Plan Ad.flv

AT&T’s new ad for the same old, overpriced product.  (1 minute)

Share






Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Cracked Minecaft: Sacety Tips: The firstt aspect of mining you shuld take account of is safety. The design and style you oopt for iss actually a major decision. M...
  • Limboaz: AT&T needs to get the money to gobble up Dish from somewhere....
  • saffron crocus: Οutstanding story there. What occurred after? Take care! Here is mmy web-site; ...
  • test: Thanks for finally talking about > Verizon...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Unfortunately there is little good academic research on the "pro-competitive" or "pro-interconnect" side. Very few academics have even understood w...
  • txpatriot: The number portability fee was supposed to be limited to a five year cost recovery period. See 47 CFR 52.33: http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/...
  • Phillip Dampier: Will you be able to attend Monday's PSC meeting in Buffalo? We will be there and it would be fun to meet....
  • Rob: Actually, I just looked at the Chattanooga service website, and if I create a "custom bundle" with the top service for each sect, excluding premium ch...
  • Loons in June: Isn't that what a company is supposed to do?...
  • jr: AT&T nickle and dimes customers but can afford to have a 5% plus dividend yield on their stock...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Hypocrisy feeds on hypocrisy. These taxes and fees (including auctions) are regressive and hurt the lower quintile of demand on a relative basis. ...
  • David Uhl: VIASAT/WILDBLUE SUCK!!! WHEN I CAN CANCEL MY MEMBERSHIP I WILL AND THEY'LL NEVER GET ANOTHER DIME OUT OF ME AGAIN! THEY MAKE ME SICK! STEALING PPLS...

Your Account: