Home » Broadband Speed »Competition »Consumer News »Verizon »Video » Currently Reading:

Verizon FiOS: No Expansion in 2011; Existing Franchise Areas Will Be Completed, But That’s It

Phillip Dampier January 10, 2011 Broadband Speed, Competition, Consumer News, Verizon, Video 3 Comments

No significant expansion for FiOS in 2011, say company officials.

A Verizon spokesman has confirmed Verizon will not be expanding its FiOS fiber to the home service into new areas in 2011, except in those communities where the company already signed franchise agreements.

It’s the second year of Verizon’s hold on fiber expansion, instituted because of objections by Wall Street, a difficult economy, and a less optimistic view by Verizon’s new management that fiber has the capacity to quickly return on investment.

For upstate New York, the end-effect of Verizon’s decision is an odd patchwork of partially-built FiOS-capable communities, mostly in suburbs amenable to Verizon’s franchise terms. Some suburbs have access to FiOS broadband and phone service, but not television.  Others have access to all three services, while many other areas have nothing but Verizon’s ordinary copper phone lines.

“If you are big on fiber, there are some outlying towns with real estate agents that list whether or not their properties have Verizon FiOS, and whether that includes television service,” says Lysander, N.Y. resident Jeff, who reads Stop the Cap! “Our town was just glad Verizon picked us for upgrades and we didn’t ask too much of the phone company, quickly agreeing to a TV franchise agreement.”

But residents in the city of Syracuse are less happy — they won’t get competitive video from Verizon and are stuck with a Time Warner Cable wired monopoly because the city “dragged its feet” on franchise negotiations.

“When it comes to bigger cities, they see Verizon’s knock on the door as an opportunity to cash in on freebies from the phone company, like upgrading their video studios for government access channels, paying substantial franchise fees, and agreeing to carry channels the city government wants on Verizon’s cable system,” Jeff says.  “When the first cable systems came to town, it was the same story; some communities dragged their feet for years trying to extract more.”

Of course, cities don’t have to wait for Verizon to take care of their growing broadband needs.  They can build their own fiber networks and deliver world class service themselves, or open the new networks up to private competitors to deliver bigger bang for your broadband buck.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WSYR Syracuse FiOS availability not planned for Syracuse during 2011 1-6-11.flv

WSYR-TV in Syracuse reports it will be a long wait for many in central New York waiting for fiber to the home television service. (Warning: Loud Volume) (1 minute)

Share

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. Ian L says:

    My guess is that Verizon only has so much money to spread around, and honestly a $90 LTE-based cellular plan is easier to provision etc. than a $150 triple play. Plus, LTE right now covers more area than FiOS does…

    Once Verizon starts seeing serious competition on the wireless side from a performance perspective, maybe then they’ll push fiber into more homes. Until then, they have millions of customers…actually tens of millions (aka all of AT&T and most of Sprint, with some of T-Mobile thrown in) worth of low hanging fruit…

  2. siouxmoux says:

    This is ATT old Fashion phone lines. This is Over for new UV No New Expansion for 2011 expect for Existing Franchise Areas Will Be finished to Complete







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Allan G: @Web Stuff - No corporation makes it easy to find all the information consumers want. I don't work for Charter but I have my years of experience in t...
  • losing fat fast: Great article, totally what I was looking for. Stop by my blog post :: ...
  • best health supplements: Yesterday, while I was at work, my sister stole my iPad and tested to see if it can survive a 25 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. ...
  • Sabiha: This totally worked for me! They gave me 12Mbps for $25.50/mo with a one year contract. I was paying $31/mo for 6mbps so this was a good deal. Be advi...
  • Thomas Smith: if i already have lightning 90, and have dead spots, it should be brighthouses responsibility to fix it not charge me extra for something im already p...
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): My question is does it open up layers 1-2 to wholesale? Maybe not overnight, but eventually?...
  • Phillip Dampier: It is no surprise to me to see companies like cell tower asset holders rush headlong in this direction, and clearly companies like AT&T wanted these a...
  • nxm: I was paying 91.23 out of pocket inclusive of everything for U200 and 18Mbps. As soon as the promotion ended after a year, the cost went up to 158.57....
  • Michael Elling (@Infostack): Do you think the capital markets will want this type of REIT to operate like the towers and datacenters (and malls and commercial office buildings?) i...
  • Milan In Austin: I've done my part and submitted my comments to the New York State PSC. Here they are: >>>> Dear Secretary Burgess, I have been a faithf...
  • nikita: Unsurprisingly, new customer promos are ~ 40% less than rack rate @ AT&T U-Verse. I'm on month-to-month U200 + 18mbps plan ($174/mo) with 3+ years...
  • Mike B: I called to get a Uverse box upgrade 6 months after I upgraded to HD with antiquated equipment, they only upgraded the software on the box. The DVR w...

Your Account: