Home » AT&T »Consumer News »Video » Currently Reading:

AT&T Sends Collection Agency After Kansas City Woman to Collect $1,182 She Didn’t Owe

Phillip Dampier July 19, 2010 AT&T, Consumer News, Video 3 Comments

AT&T was sending 156 page cell phone bills in Linda Drussel's name to her son in Texas

All Linda Drussel tried to do was add her son and daughter-in-law to her AT&T FamilyTalk calling plan, adding a phone to Drussel’s account for $10 per month.  But instead of a $10 monthly fee added to her bill, Drussel got a past due notice from a collection agency demanding $1,182, threatening to ruin her credit if she didn’t pay.

Drussel told WDAF-TV she doesn’t pay her bills late, and had no idea what AT&T was talking about, having never received a past due bill from AT&T.  The collections agency was unimpressed, telling Drussel, “Oh come on, Ms. Dressel, you have to know about this — your name is on this.”

Drussel made multiple calls to AT&T trying to get someone to resolve this, but even company supervisors refused to provide any straight answers.  WDAF-TV felt Drussel’s pain when they got the AT&T runaround themselves.  At one point, a reporter was surprised when AT&T asked her for Drussel’s AT&T cell phone number.

It turns out AT&T didn’t establish service for her son under her own account — instead opening one under her name and charging full price for service, delivering the bill to her son’s home in Texas.  When her son and daughter-in-law divorced, nobody paid the bill and AT&T’s collections department decided to pursue Linda Drussel for the past due bill, claiming it was her responsibility.

With a local station’s newscast following the story, AT&T finally determined Linda didn’t ultimately owe the company a cent and has resumed pursuing her son for the past due balance.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WDAF Kansas City Problem Solvers Calling ATT 7-13-10.flv

WDAF-TV’s ‘Problem Solvers’ had to be called in to try and get through to AT&T that a Kansas City-area woman didn’t owe the company $1,182 it claimed she did.  (3 minutes)




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Truth Squad: Kansas City Star Drinks the Kool-Aid
  2. AT&T Diverts Salt Lake City 911 Calls to Seattle
  3. TxtMsg Ripoff: OMG, Cell Phone Provider Sends $500 Bill to Texting Teen’s Dad for Data That Costs Them A Penny to Deliver
  4. Google Broadband: Topeka Renames Itself Google, Kansas to Attract Fiber Experiment
  5. AT&T’s Custom-Written Kansas Deregulation Bill Causes Scandal – Secret Negotiations Alleged

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    Corporate terrorism on the march

  2. blek says:

    I’m no fan of at&t but this sounds like it was her fault. She asked for a line/account to be added for her son – this was to be an add on account which she would be responsible for, not a separate, unrelated account.

    Unless the son went to an at&t store or called up in person and agreed to his own contract, the account was only an add-on to her own account and that means it is her responsibility including any past due balance racked up by her son, regardless of where the bills were being sent.

  3. Scott says:

    This was hardly her fault, she requested a $10/mo phone to be added under her account for her son. This is a family plan, what they did was add a individual cell phone plan at probably $50-100/mo instead as a separate account with the billing not even going to her so she never saw it. AT&T did not follow her request correctly for service to be added and proceed to charge much much more than intended.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • James R Bivins: I know how satellite internet works,it signal comes from space and cable comes from on electric poles that cable run pole to pole.I have satellite int...
  • Tim Johnson: It seems like a lot of people are truly stupid...haha...of course cable is much cheaper! satellite companies are not trying to compete with cable serv...
  • Tim Johnson: Stop the cap? Are you serious? You have a whole website based on non-sense? It appears that you do not understand how satellite internet service works...
  • Paul: Very interesting and sure glad I went on-line to look up this company. The ad just appeared in the Dallas area Feb 10, 2012, and glad to know it's a s...
  • Loons In June!: No its not. Its hooked to a Cisco TW Cable DVR. The point I was making is that Riley Is comparing the TW App with what is effectively an overpriced sl...
  • Ben: Is your Slingbox an HD satellite receiver with 1TB DVR?...
  • nolan: ad says you may get 53 channels ? but 12 is a long way from 53 ! since i can get at least 31 channels with a rca flat antenna for $14.95 from wal-mar...
  • Loons In June!: Hi Riley nice commercial. Isn't Dish Networks TV everywhere just a slingbox? Or am I mistaken? Oh it is. "Dish will begin taking orders for the Vi...
  • Bill Bishop: Please note that these are the same clowns who sell the Heat Surge (you can bag all the glitz and get a thermostatically controlled 1500 watt heater a...
  • Jack J: Read the ad a little more thouroughly. It does not say you can get 953 channels. It says you can recieve approximatly 53 channels in your local area ...
  • Michelle: Thanks for the article... this ad just ran in Pittsburgh yesterday. Will make sure to forward to others! Many Thanks!...
  • Riley: I’m sure many Time Warner customers are happy that they have the ability to stream some channels to their iPhone. The main issue I see with the app is...

Your Account: