Home » AT&T »Consumer News »Video » Currently Reading:

AT&T Sends Collection Agency After Kansas City Woman to Collect $1,182 She Didn’t Owe

Phillip Dampier July 19, 2010 AT&T, Consumer News, Video 3 Comments

AT&T was sending 156 page cell phone bills in Linda Drussel's name to her son in Texas

All Linda Drussel tried to do was add her son and daughter-in-law to her AT&T FamilyTalk calling plan, adding a phone to Drussel’s account for $10 per month.  But instead of a $10 monthly fee added to her bill, Drussel got a past due notice from a collection agency demanding $1,182, threatening to ruin her credit if she didn’t pay.

Drussel told WDAF-TV she doesn’t pay her bills late, and had no idea what AT&T was talking about, having never received a past due bill from AT&T.  The collections agency was unimpressed, telling Drussel, “Oh come on, Ms. Dressel, you have to know about this — your name is on this.”

Drussel made multiple calls to AT&T trying to get someone to resolve this, but even company supervisors refused to provide any straight answers.  WDAF-TV felt Drussel’s pain when they got the AT&T runaround themselves.  At one point, a reporter was surprised when AT&T asked her for Drussel’s AT&T cell phone number.

It turns out AT&T didn’t establish service for her son under her own account — instead opening one under her name and charging full price for service, delivering the bill to her son’s home in Texas.  When her son and daughter-in-law divorced, nobody paid the bill and AT&T’s collections department decided to pursue Linda Drussel for the past due bill, claiming it was her responsibility.

With a local station’s newscast following the story, AT&T finally determined Linda didn’t ultimately owe the company a cent and has resumed pursuing her son for the past due balance.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WDAF Kansas City Problem Solvers Calling ATT 7-13-10.flv

WDAF-TV’s ‘Problem Solvers’ had to be called in to try and get through to AT&T that a Kansas City-area woman didn’t owe the company $1,182 it claimed she did.  (3 minutes)

Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. AT&T Giving Nashville Customers Bill Shock – Hundreds of Dollars of Overcharging… Month After Month
  2. Truth Squad: Kansas City Star Drinks the Kool-Aid
  3. TxtMsg Ripoff: OMG, Cell Phone Provider Sends $500 Bill to Texting Teen’s Dad for Data That Costs Them A Penny to Deliver
  4. AT&T Diverts Salt Lake City 911 Calls to Seattle
  5. AT&T’s Custom-Written Kansas Deregulation Bill Causes Scandal – Secret Negotiations Alleged

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    Corporate terrorism on the march

  2. blek says:

    I’m no fan of at&t but this sounds like it was her fault. She asked for a line/account to be added for her son – this was to be an add on account which she would be responsible for, not a separate, unrelated account.

    Unless the son went to an at&t store or called up in person and agreed to his own contract, the account was only an add-on to her own account and that means it is her responsibility including any past due balance racked up by her son, regardless of where the bills were being sent.

  3. Scott says:

    This was hardly her fault, she requested a $10/mo phone to be added under her account for her son. This is a family plan, what they did was add a individual cell phone plan at probably $50-100/mo instead as a separate account with the billing not even going to her so she never saw it. AT&T did not follow her request correctly for service to be added and proceed to charge much much more than intended.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Phillip Dampier: I take your point, but honestly have not considered Panera Bread's Wi-Fi problems as part of the fight against broadband caps....
  • txpatriot: "You should not read into every story written here as an effort to prove some point." Of course not -- that's why the website is titled "Stop the C...
  • James R Curry: Hey Phillip, It's a thorny subject. There are a lot of coffee shops that set themselves up as places for people to come and meet and work and stud...
  • Phillip Dampier: I don't have any position to take regarding Panera. It's a free Wi-Fi service. If I go into Panera Bread, I am honestly there to buy their food, not t...
  • Alex Perrier: Another option is speed caps. i've experienced speeds of anywhere from 1 Mbit/s to 6 Mbit/s at Bell Wi-Fi hotspots. i think this is reasonable. Tho...
  • George Douglas: Cisco had nothing to do with this. Verizon Network Integration is the vendor. Gianato was told five days prior to the contract being signed that these...
  • Smith6612: True. All of the above works fine. Even then though, I don't think they need to spend money replacing their current gear with something from Meraki fo...
  • Tk: Perhaps Phillip is blaming the wireless phone company caps for this situation at Panera. "The problem has gotten even worse since wireless phone co...
  • txpatriot: Interesting situation. The commenters providing suggested solutions are even more interesting, but what I find MOST interesting is that, provided...
  • AP: No surprise here. Traditional TV has NOTHING on except for stupid reality shows and unfunny sitcoms. I do most of my TV watching online but for sports...
  • Scott: Their CTO or whoever is in charge is failing spectacularly if this has been going on for 2yrs. There's a number of vendors, one such as Meraki that pr...
  • Gene: I am an old retired Navy Electronics Technician (Master Chief/E-9) and just wanted to throw in my 2 cents worth. I live about 2 miles outside of my n...

Your Account: