Home » Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging » Currently Reading:

Go and Vote in Beaumont, Texas Poll on Internet Overcharging Schemes

Phillip Dampier June 18, 2010 Editorial & Site News, Internet Overcharging 3 Comments

The Beaumont Enterprise has an online poll up to accompany its report on the end of AT&T’s Internet Overcharging scheme.  The poll is not well-written — I’ll write about that later.  In the meantime, let’s deliver a message to Beaumont that usage caps and other overcharging schemes are -not acceptable!-

The poll:

Should companies charge you based on the bandwidth you use?

  • Yes.  You pay more for larger and faster in everything else.
  • No.  Volume purchases should yield a discount.  <– Vote for this one.
  • Hold on while I download this movie.

The first option is nonsense.  If you buy unlimited long distance plans from AT&T (assuming they bill you correctly), do you pay more for making 10 vs. 100 calls?  No you don’t.  The second choice is the one we recommend you choose, even though it’s poorly worded — it assumes you should still be capped, just not as extremely.  We’ll have to re-educate them on that.  The third option is simply insulting — playing into the stereotype that “heavy downloaders” are simply pilfering movies from the web.  That’s garbage.  We’ll educate them about that as well.

Thus far, with 75 votes in, the noes have it.  Let’s make that overwhelmingly so — here is the link.

Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. AT&T Customers in Beaumont and Reno Finally Get Word The Internet Overcharging is Over
  2. Slate Columnist Blames iPhone Users For AT&T’s Self-Inflicted Wireless Woes, Advocates Internet Overcharging Schemes
  3. 1st Anniversary of Time Warner Cable Internet Overcharging Experiment for Texas, North Carolina, New York
  4. AT&T Mobility Wants to Impose Internet Overcharging Schemes On Everyone; Blames “Net Neutrality”
  5. Australia Achieves Unlimited Broadband – Say ‘Goodbye’ to Internet Overcharging Schemes

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. Mike says:

    It’s also poorly worded because they conflate bandwidth with data usage. Time Warner has always based their charges on bandwidth; they have a Standard tier that provides a certain speed, a Turbo tier that costs more but goes a bit faster, and a Lite tier that is a lot slower but costs less than the Standard tier. What’s new is the addition of an arbitrarily low cap on data transferred.

    I don’t mind paying more for a faster connection, but I do have an issue with my ISP also charging me for data that they aren’t providing in the first place. If I’m renting the whole pipe from them and buying the water somewhere else, why is the ISP the one installing a meter?

  2. Loons In June! says:

    Its a horribly worded poll but its fun to see that despite Phil telling us how to vote 23% still are currently voting the other way!

    • That is hardly surprising considering the false logic of paying for broadband like water or gas service. Once consumers find out how profitable service is at today’s pricing, they’ll achieve BP-level anger at the overcharging schemes that simply aren’t justified.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • James R Bivins: I know how satellite internet works,it signal comes from space and cable comes from on electric poles that cable run pole to pole.I have satellite int...
  • Tim Johnson: It seems like a lot of people are truly stupid...haha...of course cable is much cheaper! satellite companies are not trying to compete with cable serv...
  • Tim Johnson: Stop the cap? Are you serious? You have a whole website based on non-sense? It appears that you do not understand how satellite internet service works...
  • Paul: Very interesting and sure glad I went on-line to look up this company. The ad just appeared in the Dallas area Feb 10, 2012, and glad to know it's a s...
  • Loons In June!: No its not. Its hooked to a Cisco TW Cable DVR. The point I was making is that Riley Is comparing the TW App with what is effectively an overpriced sl...
  • Ben: Is your Slingbox an HD satellite receiver with 1TB DVR?...
  • nolan: ad says you may get 53 channels ? but 12 is a long way from 53 ! since i can get at least 31 channels with a rca flat antenna for $14.95 from wal-mar...
  • Loons In June!: Hi Riley nice commercial. Isn't Dish Networks TV everywhere just a slingbox? Or am I mistaken? Oh it is. "Dish will begin taking orders for the Vi...
  • Bill Bishop: Please note that these are the same clowns who sell the Heat Surge (you can bag all the glitz and get a thermostatically controlled 1500 watt heater a...
  • Jack J: Read the ad a little more thouroughly. It does not say you can get 953 channels. It says you can recieve approximatly 53 channels in your local area ...
  • Michelle: Thanks for the article... this ad just ran in Pittsburgh yesterday. Will make sure to forward to others! Many Thanks!...
  • Riley: I’m sure many Time Warner customers are happy that they have the ability to stream some channels to their iPhone. The main issue I see with the app is...

Your Account: