Home » Editorial & Site News »Internet Overcharging » Currently Reading:

Go and Vote in Beaumont, Texas Poll on Internet Overcharging Schemes

Phillip Dampier June 18, 2010 Editorial & Site News, Internet Overcharging 3 Comments

The Beaumont Enterprise has an online poll up to accompany its report on the end of AT&T’s Internet Overcharging scheme.  The poll is not well-written — I’ll write about that later.  In the meantime, let’s deliver a message to Beaumont that usage caps and other overcharging schemes are -not acceptable!-

The poll:

Should companies charge you based on the bandwidth you use?

  • Yes.  You pay more for larger and faster in everything else.
  • No.  Volume purchases should yield a discount.  <– Vote for this one.
  • Hold on while I download this movie.

The first option is nonsense.  If you buy unlimited long distance plans from AT&T (assuming they bill you correctly), do you pay more for making 10 vs. 100 calls?  No you don’t.  The second choice is the one we recommend you choose, even though it’s poorly worded — it assumes you should still be capped, just not as extremely.  We’ll have to re-educate them on that.  The third option is simply insulting — playing into the stereotype that “heavy downloaders” are simply pilfering movies from the web.  That’s garbage.  We’ll educate them about that as well.

Thus far, with 75 votes in, the noes have it.  Let’s make that overwhelmingly so — here is the link.

Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. AT&T Customers in Beaumont and Reno Finally Get Word The Internet Overcharging is Over
  2. Call to Action: Push Poll Scam – Hang Up on the Pro-Cable/Telco Poll Calls in North Carolina!
  3. Slate Columnist Blames iPhone Users For AT&T’s Self-Inflicted Wireless Woes, Advocates Internet Overcharging Schemes
  4. AT&T Mobility Wants to Impose Internet Overcharging Schemes On Everyone; Blames “Net Neutrality”
  5. Australia Achieves Unlimited Broadband – Say ‘Goodbye’ to Internet Overcharging Schemes

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. Mike says:

    It’s also poorly worded because they conflate bandwidth with data usage. Time Warner has always based their charges on bandwidth; they have a Standard tier that provides a certain speed, a Turbo tier that costs more but goes a bit faster, and a Lite tier that is a lot slower but costs less than the Standard tier. What’s new is the addition of an arbitrarily low cap on data transferred.

    I don’t mind paying more for a faster connection, but I do have an issue with my ISP also charging me for data that they aren’t providing in the first place. If I’m renting the whole pipe from them and buying the water somewhere else, why is the ISP the one installing a meter?

  2. Loons In June! says:

    Its a horribly worded poll but its fun to see that despite Phil telling us how to vote 23% still are currently voting the other way!

    • That is hardly surprising considering the false logic of paying for broadband like water or gas service. Once consumers find out how profitable service is at today’s pricing, they’ll achieve BP-level anger at the overcharging schemes that simply aren’t justified.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Scott: You're partly correct about a new access point or router helping them. The problem with consumer or lower quality wireless access points is they do...
  • txpatriot: I was just yanking your chain (and being an @$$)....
  • Phillip Dampier: I take your point, but honestly have not considered Panera Bread's Wi-Fi problems as part of the fight against broadband caps....
  • txpatriot: "You should not read into every story written here as an effort to prove some point." Of course not -- that's why the website is titled "Stop the C...
  • James R Curry: Hey Phillip, It's a thorny subject. There are a lot of coffee shops that set themselves up as places for people to come and meet and work and stud...
  • Phillip Dampier: I don't have any position to take regarding Panera. It's a free Wi-Fi service. If I go into Panera Bread, I am honestly there to buy their food, not t...
  • Alex Perrier: Another option is speed caps. i've experienced speeds of anywhere from 1 Mbit/s to 6 Mbit/s at Bell Wi-Fi hotspots. i think this is reasonable. Tho...
  • George Douglas: Cisco had nothing to do with this. Verizon Network Integration is the vendor. Gianato was told five days prior to the contract being signed that these...
  • Smith6612: True. All of the above works fine. Even then though, I don't think they need to spend money replacing their current gear with something from Meraki fo...
  • Tk: Perhaps Phillip is blaming the wireless phone company caps for this situation at Panera. "The problem has gotten even worse since wireless phone co...
  • txpatriot: Interesting situation. The commenters providing suggested solutions are even more interesting, but what I find MOST interesting is that, provided...
  • AP: No surprise here. Traditional TV has NOTHING on except for stupid reality shows and unfunny sitcoms. I do most of my TV watching online but for sports...

Your Account: