Home » AT&T »Consumer News »Internet Overcharging »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Using AT&T’s MicroCell for 3G Counts Against Your Usage Cap

Phillip Dampier June 17, 2010 AT&T, Consumer News, Internet Overcharging, Wireless Broadband 5 Comments

AT&T 3G MicroCell

If you are an AT&T customer with a 3G MicroCell, AT&T’s home-based “cell tower”, take note: your 3G data usage, even while at home, counts against your monthly usage cap.

AT&T’s MicroCell ($150) does not use AT&T’s mobile network — it instead relies on your home broadband connection — but AT&T charges customers as if they were.

For customers who assume MicroCell traffic should be exempt because they provide and pay for the connectivity, AT&T’s overlimit fees await.

The company’s pricing and policies make owning a MicroCell increasingly pointless, particularly for data applications.  That’s because AT&T does not meter Wi-Fi usage, even when using AT&T’s own Wi-Fi network.

The disparity between femtocell traffic (the industry name for devices like the MicroCell) and Wi-Fi doesn’t make much sense to Dean Bubley, writing for his Disruptive Wireless-Disruptive Analysis blog:

Given that the RAN generally costs much more than the core network for most operators, there should clearly be differential (or zero-rated) pricing for traffic using femtocell offload. Either that, or there should be a mechanism for customers to charge AT&T for using THE USER’S broadband pipes for backhaul.

It is critical that any policy management and charging infrastruture is capable of discerning bearer type (which could also be UMA WiFi tunneled via the core on some other networks). Otherwise it makes a total mockery of the concept that policy is intended to align pricing with the underlying costs of service delivery.

It also makes a mockery of the femtocell concept as a mass proposition, if the end-user has to pay more than using their own WiFi. If I was a femto vendor today, I’d be spitting feathers about this, as it completely undermines the positioning vs. WiFi as an offload tool.

AT&T doesn’t care.

“The 3G MicroCell complements Wi-Fi by providing enhanced in-home voice coverage and reliable data when Wi-Fi may not be available — but it is primarily intended for voice calls,” an AT&T spokeswoman wrote in an email to Light Reading Mobile.

As the website notes, for consumers, the femto price model means that they will pay AT&T for the Microcell to get better indoor 3G coverage, pay for the backhaul connection to AT&T’s core network, and pay AT&T to use that indoor 3G base station.  What a great deal — for AT&T.

Share

Currently there are 5 comments on this Article:

  1. Greg says:

    Amen. It is insulting that you pay three times to use the Microcell: to buy the device, to use your 3G voice/data allocation, and to use your own broadband connection (which may be metered, to wit).

    Either the device should be (virtually) free or the usage of it should be (virtually) free. Otherwise, this is an awful deal for consumers, no matter how you slice it. Shame on AT&T.

  2. Michael Chaney says:

    AT&T claims that they prefer you to use WiFi when available, but that their MicroCell provides a “complement” voice service. Well how about just letting me make VoIP calls over my home WiFi network and scrap the MicroCell altogether? Oh right, this is all about a money grab for AT&T and has nothing really to do with reducing their traffic load. That’s would just be a side benefit for them

  3. jr says:

    Greediness is Godliness to AT&T

  4. TM says:

    Triple-dipping is even more profitable than double-dipping.







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Powers: It was also in a situation in which you are expected to present your own ideas and thoughts in your own words, for the purpose of educating you to do ...
  • cricinfo clt20 live streaming: A convenient styling pik is stored in the base of the handle. Moreover if you do exceed your limit they can't tell you when it happened or give you...
  • http://websupport.esudo.com/: At this time I am going to do my breakfast, when having my breakfast coming again to read further news....
  • SEO Sarasota: I think the admin of this web site is really working hard in favor of his web page, for the reason that here every material is quality based stuff....
  • BobInIllinois: I would have been given an F in my high school for that amount of plagiarism, and also put on academic probation. But, that was in the 70's, when pub...
  • txpatriot: I agree this doesn't look good. Clyburn has been the Commissioner most supportive of consumer issues since Michael Copps left. I doubt if Copps woul...
  • Duffin: I just love how Comcast claims it's too expensive to build out infrastructure to give everyone faster speeds which many foreign countries already have...
  • txpatriot: Tax policy is designed (theoretically) encourage those things we want (tax breaks) and discourage those things we don't want (additional taxes or pena...
  • jeffrey black: Terrible service, complained after 2 days and they charged me $278 early term fee. Then after speaking to over 10 different people they lied to me ab...
  • Phillip Dampier: The real problem is that satellite broadband has inherent limitations that will always make it a poor alternative to wired service. But that will requ...
  • Douglas Brown: Frank Gau, Just because you had this experience, it doesn't justify labeling Exede a bad product. And, it is definitely not grounds for a lawsuit, th...
  • JR: Brighthouse has a monopoly over Central Florida and they pretty much do what they can get away with....

Your Account: