" /> Using AT&T’s MicroCell for 3G Counts Against Your Usage Cap | Stop the Cap!

Home » AT&T »Consumer News »Internet Overcharging »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Using AT&T’s MicroCell for 3G Counts Against Your Usage Cap

Phillip Dampier June 17, 2010 AT&T, Consumer News, Internet Overcharging, Wireless Broadband 5 Comments

AT&T 3G MicroCell

If you are an AT&T customer with a 3G MicroCell, AT&T’s home-based “cell tower”, take note: your 3G data usage, even while at home, counts against your monthly usage cap.

AT&T’s MicroCell ($150) does not use AT&T’s mobile network — it instead relies on your home broadband connection — but AT&T charges customers as if they were.

For customers who assume MicroCell traffic should be exempt because they provide and pay for the connectivity, AT&T’s overlimit fees await.

The company’s pricing and policies make owning a MicroCell increasingly pointless, particularly for data applications.  That’s because AT&T does not meter Wi-Fi usage, even when using AT&T’s own Wi-Fi network.

The disparity between femtocell traffic (the industry name for devices like the MicroCell) and Wi-Fi doesn’t make much sense to Dean Bubley, writing for his Disruptive Wireless-Disruptive Analysis blog:

Given that the RAN generally costs much more than the core network for most operators, there should clearly be differential (or zero-rated) pricing for traffic using femtocell offload. Either that, or there should be a mechanism for customers to charge AT&T for using THE USER’S broadband pipes for backhaul.

It is critical that any policy management and charging infrastruture is capable of discerning bearer type (which could also be UMA WiFi tunneled via the core on some other networks). Otherwise it makes a total mockery of the concept that policy is intended to align pricing with the underlying costs of service delivery.

It also makes a mockery of the femtocell concept as a mass proposition, if the end-user has to pay more than using their own WiFi. If I was a femto vendor today, I’d be spitting feathers about this, as it completely undermines the positioning vs. WiFi as an offload tool.

AT&T doesn’t care.

“The 3G MicroCell complements Wi-Fi by providing enhanced in-home voice coverage and reliable data when Wi-Fi may not be available — but it is primarily intended for voice calls,” an AT&T spokeswoman wrote in an email to Light Reading Mobile.

As the website notes, for consumers, the femto price model means that they will pay AT&T for the Microcell to get better indoor 3G coverage, pay for the backhaul connection to AT&T’s core network, and pay AT&T to use that indoor 3G base station.  What a great deal — for AT&T.

Share

Currently there are 5 comments on this Article:

  1. Greg says:

    Amen. It is insulting that you pay three times to use the Microcell: to buy the device, to use your 3G voice/data allocation, and to use your own broadband connection (which may be metered, to wit).

    Either the device should be (virtually) free or the usage of it should be (virtually) free. Otherwise, this is an awful deal for consumers, no matter how you slice it. Shame on AT&T.

  2. Michael Chaney says:

    AT&T claims that they prefer you to use WiFi when available, but that their MicroCell provides a “complement” voice service. Well how about just letting me make VoIP calls over my home WiFi network and scrap the MicroCell altogether? Oh right, this is all about a money grab for AT&T and has nothing really to do with reducing their traffic load. That’s would just be a side benefit for them

  3. jr says:

    Greediness is Godliness to AT&T

  4. TM says:

    Triple-dipping is even more profitable than double-dipping.

  5. [...] designed to turn a customer into an enemy and not an ally.”  And there’s plenty more like this across the blogosphere.  (Vodafone, which has the same policy, also comes in for some [...]







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • txpatriot: You're right Phillip, my bad....
  • Paul Houle: Well, the lifeline program dates back to before cell service existed. The new cell phone lifeline programs have the legitimate purpose of extendin...
  • Phillip Dampier: The Lifeline program is a regulated program, regardless of the technology, because it provides a government subsidy. You are correct the wireless serv...
  • txpatriot: Phillip, you blame this mess on deregulation, but deregulation actually has very little to do with it. First of all, the primary vehicle for this fra...
  • paul houle: If you go to nyc you see there are four starbucks on every block south of central park and that is a plot to fool the decision making class. Investor...
  • txpatriot: At this stage, participation for current customers is voluntary; see page 88 of the FCC Order authorizing the IP Transition trial: http://transitio...
  • txpatriot: What exactly does AT&T (or google, for that matter) hope to accomplish with these pre-launch press releases? I assume they are meant to build a...
  • Chuck Willy: What does the service agreement say? I can charge any amount rent I want on something on my property. I'll send them a bill for $1mil if my box isn't...
  • B: RST is deploying fiber across NC, and Wake Forest was promised to become the first town in the county for beta testing gigabit internet service....
  • Kerry: I actually asked that question directly to my Comcast account rep yesterday....
  • A,: Really wish North State would expand their fiber service beyond High Point into Greensboro- no one seems to want to go into Greensboro, which is madde...
  • Phillip Dampier: If you scratch millimeters below the surface, their lies and nonsense are easy to expose. Unfortunately, a lot of these senators don't have a clue abo...

Your Account: