Home » Consumer News »Internet Overcharging »Verizon »Video »Wireless Broadband » Currently Reading:

Consumers Discover “Required” Data Plans Dramatically Increasing Wireless Phone Bills

Phillip Dampier May 11, 2010 Consumer News, Internet Overcharging, Verizon, Video, Wireless Broadband 6 Comments

WTTG's "Ask Allison" segment answers a question about unwelcome mandatory data plans

Ever wonder why your cell phone bill seems to keep increasing when you renew your contract?

American wireless phone companies have discovered that subjecting an increasing percentage of customers to required data plans can create a revenue bonanza for companies, whether customers use many data services or not.

Many customers are just learning of new, mandatory data plans now required by all four of the country’s major carriers.  Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile now compel customers upgrading to new “smartphones” — designed to be used for accessing online services — to also choose an extra add-on plan to cover their data usage.  In some cases, that can add an additional $30 a month to monthly cell phone bills.

Some Verizon customers have learned about this the hard way when they tried to buy a new phone at the end of their two year contracts.  For those longstanding Verizon customers grandfathered on service plans developed five or more years ago, being forced to switch to one of Verizon’s current plans carries quite the sticker shock, especially for those who only occasionally send text messages or use data features.

The insistence by Verizon that Smartphone owners commit to their $29.99 unlimited data usage add-on plan adds considerably to monthly bills.  Many Verizon customers don’t care about increasing sizes of calling allowances — Verizon customers already enjoy free night and weekend calling and free calls to other Verizon Wireless customers (of which there are many — Verizon is now the nation’s largest wireless provider).

Here is a comparison between two near-equivalent Verizon Wireless calling plans, ones from 2005 and the other currently in effect.  There is a dramatic difference in pricing, particularly for those who would find a 250 text message allowance, and data usage counting against your minutes allowance more than sufficient to meet their needs:

AMERICA’S CHOICE II FAMILYSHARE PLAN (2005)


Plan Details

Includes Two Lines
Monthly Price: $60.00
Monthly allowance minutes: 700 general
Per minute rate after allowance: $0.45  peak ,  $0.45  off-peak

Promotion details

UNLIMITED N&W MINUTES, UNLIMITED VERIZON-TO-VERIZON CUSTOMER CALLING, MOBILE WEB – WEB USAGE COUNTS AGAINST MINUTE ALLOWANCE

Additional features

250 MESSAGE TEXT PLAN, INCLUDING TEXT AND VIDEO ($5 PER MONTH)

NATIONWIDE FAMILY TALK & TEXT SHAREPLAN (2010)


Plan Details

Includes Two Lines
Monthly Price: $99.99
Monthly allowance minutes: 700 general
Per minute rate after allowance: $0.45 peak , $0.45 off-peak

Promotion details

UNLIMITED N&W MINUTES, UNLIMITED VERIZON-TO-VERIZON CUSTOMER CALLING, UNLIMITED TEXT, PICTURE, AND VIDEO MESSAGING

Additional Features

REQUIRED UNLIMITED DATA PLAN (SMARTPHONE) ($29.99 PER MONTH)

Before taxes, fees, and surcharges, Verizon Wireless customers holding onto their legacy FamilyShare plan from 2005 would pay $65.00 per month for two lines sharing 700 minutes of calling, with one line also getting 250 text, picture, or video messages, and a data plan that ate from your minutes allowance, instead of charging you per megabyte.

Today’s plan costs far more — $129.98 — more than double, for most of the same features.  The only difference is that Verizon Wireless doesn’t presently limit your data usage or messaging on their SharePlan.

No wonder consumers are getting sticker shock when upgrading their phones.  The paradigm shift to a “required data plan” forces customers away from older service plans onto new ones.  The result is a much higher monthly bill.

All this and the same companies that have figured out how to effectively double your cell phone bill in five years are also contemplating taking away the “unlimited” part of the required data plan.

http://www.phillipdampier.com/video/WTTG Washington Is It Legal to Require A Phone Data Plan 5-7-10.flv

WTTG-TV’s “Ask Allison” feature recently answered a question from a viewer who just discovered the “mandatory data plan” as an unwelcome part of her new phone purchase.  The Washington, D.C. viewer wants to know if that’s legal.  Allison educates viewers in the nation’s capital that isn’t the only trick or trap cell phone companies have in store for you.  Bottom line: maybe you don’t want that new phone after all.  (3 minutes)

Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Can You Pay Me Now? Verizon Wireless “Refreshes” Pricing: Mandates Pricey Paltry Data Plans for “Enhanced Multimedia Phones”
  2. Verizon Wireless Data Corral: Herding Customers Into New Data Plans Starting January 18th
  3. Hot Springs Family Gets $16,000 Verizon Wireless Bill for Wireless Data Usage
  4. Wireless Data Plan Cap Relief? Sort Of
  5. Verizon Wireless Introducing Prepaid Wireless Broadband, But Get Your Wallet: $15 A Day For 75 Megabytes

Currently there are 6 comments on this Article:

  1. Mike says:

    I’m finally dropping my iphone service this year once I get a landline setup at home again via skype or my cable co (free or $30/yr).

    As much as I love my iphone and it’s convienance, it’s the device and the apps that are useful, not the cell network as wifi gives me 90% of the coverage I ever need for free at work/home.

    If it were still $60/mo it’d be one thing, but at $100/mo it’s as bad as the cable company and telco’s with their bundling. Something has to give, as a consumer I feel like I’ve got to make a stand somewhere against these outrageous charges that don’t match the service’s value IMO.

  2. TM says:

    You can end this glut by going to a prepaid service. Far better options for less money. And the coverage is pretty good if you aren’t off the beaten path too far or too often.

    Boost Mobile is $50 for unlimited talk, text and web. I’m sure their are some data limits hidden someplace, but it’s still cheaper than Verizon. Plus Verizon just jacked their early termination fee too.

  3. Jeremy says:

    This is the reason I haven’t taken advantage of the new every 2 from Verizon. I’ve been on the America’s choice plan(along with the rest of my family) for 4 years and am running on year 2 of not taking them up on the new phone. If I go to a new phone, I automatically have to go to the Nation’s plan, plus pay a $10 data plan even for a “half” smartphone. I can’t even reduce my plan to lower minutes without them extending me to another 2 year agreement. Their prices and TOS are highway robbery. I despise them. I’ve wanted to buy one of the new droid’s and use it on the nework as a phone only, using wifi when accessible for internet, I can’t even do that with an unlocked phone if I pay full price because of Verizon’s idiotic data requirement.

    Companies left to their own devices with minimal regulations will do anything to make even more money, morally or ethically wrong be damned. Greed to them is not a sin, it’s their motto. Verizon and the rest of the carriers make a total joke of the FCC, consumer protection org’s and laws. They are what the cable and ISP’s want to become, minus any regulation by the FCC.

  4. Paul says:

    I’m not defending this, but someone was telling me that Verizon is doing this for our benefit. Supposedly it’s to prevent people accidentally opening up the web browsers on their non-data plan smart phones and then whining when Verizon tacks the fairly minimal charge onto their bill. (IIRC, they told me when I got my phone (enV Touch) that if I accidentally opened the browser and loaded a page it would be a 3 dollar charge initially and then they would charge by the MB after that. I would much rather have that 3 dollar charge than their required $10/month one. Heck, I’d much rather just disable the web browser all together. I doubt they’d let me do that a get rid of the data plan though.

    • Ron Dafoe says:

      If that was really the case, they would have a block that you can put on your phone number so that no data can be used.

      • Paul says:

        I wasn’t saying I believed it, just what I was told from somebody. I know that all wireless providers are greedy and could care less about what’s best for us.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • txpatriot: I was just yanking your chain (and being an @$$)....
  • Phillip Dampier: I take your point, but honestly have not considered Panera Bread's Wi-Fi problems as part of the fight against broadband caps....
  • txpatriot: "You should not read into every story written here as an effort to prove some point." Of course not -- that's why the website is titled "Stop the C...
  • James R Curry: Hey Phillip, It's a thorny subject. There are a lot of coffee shops that set themselves up as places for people to come and meet and work and stud...
  • Phillip Dampier: I don't have any position to take regarding Panera. It's a free Wi-Fi service. If I go into Panera Bread, I am honestly there to buy their food, not t...
  • Alex Perrier: Another option is speed caps. i've experienced speeds of anywhere from 1 Mbit/s to 6 Mbit/s at Bell Wi-Fi hotspots. i think this is reasonable. Tho...
  • George Douglas: Cisco had nothing to do with this. Verizon Network Integration is the vendor. Gianato was told five days prior to the contract being signed that these...
  • Smith6612: True. All of the above works fine. Even then though, I don't think they need to spend money replacing their current gear with something from Meraki fo...
  • Tk: Perhaps Phillip is blaming the wireless phone company caps for this situation at Panera. "The problem has gotten even worse since wireless phone co...
  • txpatriot: Interesting situation. The commenters providing suggested solutions are even more interesting, but what I find MOST interesting is that, provided...
  • AP: No surprise here. Traditional TV has NOTHING on except for stupid reality shows and unfunny sitcoms. I do most of my TV watching online but for sports...
  • Scott: Their CTO or whoever is in charge is failing spectacularly if this has been going on for 2yrs. There's a number of vendors, one such as Meraki that pr...

Your Account: