<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complete Video of North Carolina&#8217;s &#8220;Fiber is Obsolete&#8221; Revenue Laws Study Committee Meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2010/05/10/complete-video-of-north-carolinas-fiber-is-obsolete-revenue-laws-study-committee-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/05/10/complete-video-of-north-carolinas-fiber-is-obsolete-revenue-laws-study-committee-meeting/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:58:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop the Cap! &#187; Opelika Endures Silly Opposition to Municipal Broadband: Zombie Appliances, Internet Takeovers, Socialism</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/05/10/complete-video-of-north-carolinas-fiber-is-obsolete-revenue-laws-study-committee-meeting/#comment-11633</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop the Cap! &#187; Opelika Endures Silly Opposition to Municipal Broadband: Zombie Appliances, Internet Takeovers, Socialism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=9531#comment-11633</guid>
		<description>[...] system in Davidson has been written about here before &#8212; it is not even municipal fiber.  It&#8217;s a formerly bankrupt Adelphia cable operation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] system in Davidson has been written about here before &#8212; it is not even municipal fiber.  It&#8217;s a formerly bankrupt Adelphia cable operation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnStJ</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/05/10/complete-video-of-north-carolinas-fiber-is-obsolete-revenue-laws-study-committee-meeting/#comment-10172</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnStJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=9531#comment-10172</guid>
		<description>North Carolina&#039;s continuing success in beating off the attack in the legislature has been an inspiration to those of us watching the scrum...thanks for showing all how it can be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Carolina&#8217;s continuing success in beating off the attack in the legislature has been an inspiration to those of us watching the scrum&#8230;thanks for showing all how it can be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Ovittore</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/05/10/complete-video-of-north-carolinas-fiber-is-obsolete-revenue-laws-study-committee-meeting/#comment-10170</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Ovittore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=9531#comment-10170</guid>
		<description>Thanks John.  They called their bill the &quot;level playing field&quot; bill here in NC the last 3 years and it has died in committee each time.  I appreciate the link and the insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks John.  They called their bill the &#8220;level playing field&#8221; bill here in NC the last 3 years and it has died in committee each time.  I appreciate the link and the insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnStJ</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/05/10/complete-video-of-north-carolinas-fiber-is-obsolete-revenue-laws-study-committee-meeting/#comment-10169</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnStJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=9531#comment-10169</guid>
		<description>Lafayette, Louisiana went through much of this in 2004. In the end the city compromised, under duress, and the incumbent-based bill was passed. The lessons learned from what ensued are available through Terry Huval&#039;s recent testimony before the Senate&#039;s Small Business subcommittee at http://sbc.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&amp;File_id=646b01b6-6e75-4f5a-9c0f-790c0ba48889

I can summarize the lesson pretty simply: Don&#039;t compromise with the incumbents, don&#039;t give in to the temptation to look reasonable. Defeat the bill.

In Louisiana, what looked like a merely onerous compromise was never honestly used as such by the corporations that demanded state protection from local competition. They immediately reneged on agreed upon interpretations hammered out behind closed doors, went back to the legislature for &quot;amendments&quot; at the very next session, used the law a as the basis for lawsuits the last of which went to the state supreme court and resulted in victory for the community. Along the way an entirely new state regulatory apparatus created to restrain price breaks the community wanted to give its citizens. That&#039;s not to mention, of course, the ugly public relations battle the incumbents waged in an attempt to defeat what was obviously the will of the community. 

4 million dollars and 4 years later the project finally got underway. Even though It is now completing its buildout and is meeting all its goals and is providing the city with what is arguably the nations most powerful large network that success was hard-won; it was a bruising battle intended to intimidate Lafayette and any city that wanted to follow its lead in Louisiana. 

The so-called &quot;Fair Competition Act&quot; was anything but. 

Don&#039;t concede an inch. Lafayette&#039;s learned that you can&#039;t regard these guys as honest negotiators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lafayette, Louisiana went through much of this in 2004. In the end the city compromised, under duress, and the incumbent-based bill was passed. The lessons learned from what ensued are available through Terry Huval&#8217;s recent testimony before the Senate&#8217;s Small Business subcommittee at <a href="http://sbc.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&#038;File_id=646b01b6-6e75-4f5a-9c0f-790c0ba48889" rel="nofollow">http://sbc.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&#038;File_id=646b01b6-6e75-4f5a-9c0f-790c0ba48889</a></p>
<p>I can summarize the lesson pretty simply: Don&#8217;t compromise with the incumbents, don&#8217;t give in to the temptation to look reasonable. Defeat the bill.</p>
<p>In Louisiana, what looked like a merely onerous compromise was never honestly used as such by the corporations that demanded state protection from local competition. They immediately reneged on agreed upon interpretations hammered out behind closed doors, went back to the legislature for &#8220;amendments&#8221; at the very next session, used the law a as the basis for lawsuits the last of which went to the state supreme court and resulted in victory for the community. Along the way an entirely new state regulatory apparatus created to restrain price breaks the community wanted to give its citizens. That&#8217;s not to mention, of course, the ugly public relations battle the incumbents waged in an attempt to defeat what was obviously the will of the community. </p>
<p>4 million dollars and 4 years later the project finally got underway. Even though It is now completing its buildout and is meeting all its goals and is providing the city with what is arguably the nations most powerful large network that success was hard-won; it was a bruising battle intended to intimidate Lafayette and any city that wanted to follow its lead in Louisiana. </p>
<p>The so-called &#8220;Fair Competition Act&#8221; was anything but. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t concede an inch. Lafayette&#8217;s learned that you can&#8217;t regard these guys as honest negotiators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

