<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadband.gov Testing America&#8217;s Broadband Speeds, But Questions Arise About Accuracy of Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/15/broadband-gov-testing-americas-broadband-speeds-but-questions-arise-about-accuracy-of-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/15/broadband-gov-testing-americas-broadband-speeds-but-questions-arise-about-accuracy-of-test/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/15/broadband-gov-testing-americas-broadband-speeds-but-questions-arise-about-accuracy-of-test/#comment-9082</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=8376#comment-9082</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t Time Warner do that &quot;speedboost&quot; thing? That would give erroneous results because it boosts your speed for around 2 seconds worth.

Finally able to test mine out. I have 12Mb/sec download and 1.5Mb/sec upload through Uverse.


Download - 11089 Kb/s

Upload       - 1425 Kb/s

Latency      - 57ms

Jitter           - 2ms

Speakeasy:

Download - 11.53 Mb/s

Upload       - 1.46Mb/s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Time Warner do that &#8220;speedboost&#8221; thing? That would give erroneous results because it boosts your speed for around 2 seconds worth.</p>
<p>Finally able to test mine out. I have 12Mb/sec download and 1.5Mb/sec upload through Uverse.</p>
<p>Download &#8211; 11089 Kb/s</p>
<p>Upload       &#8211; 1425 Kb/s</p>
<p>Latency      &#8211; 57ms</p>
<p>Jitter           &#8211; 2ms</p>
<p>Speakeasy:</p>
<p>Download &#8211; 11.53 Mb/s</p>
<p>Upload       &#8211; 1.46Mb/s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrionS</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/15/broadband-gov-testing-americas-broadband-speeds-but-questions-arise-about-accuracy-of-test/#comment-9079</link>
		<dc:creator>BrionS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=8376#comment-9079</guid>
		<description>I like to get my info from several sources and here&#039;s what they say about my Roadrunner connection (supposed to be 15 Mbps down, 1 Mbps up):

TWC Speed Test (Rochester, NY)
 - 19.73 Mbps down
 - 0.97 Mbps up

Frontier
 - 11.39 Mbps down
 - 0.95 Mbps up

Broadband.gov (Ookla test)
 - 17.95 Mbps down
 - 0.96 Mbps up
 - 55ms Latency
 - 7 ms JItter

Broadband.gov (Mlab test)
 - 16.24 Mbps down
 - 0.90 Mbps up
 - 205 ms Latency
 - 401 ms Jitter

Speedtest.net (Ookla)
 - 19.53 Mbps down
 - 0.95 Mbps up
 - 81 ms Latency

Measurement Lab (mlab)
 - 15.89 Mbps up
 - 0.88 Mbps down

So what&#039;s it all mean?  Well they all pretty much agree I get about 1Mbps up (as advertised), but they disagree a bit about the 15 Mbps down I&#039;m supposed to get, varying from 11.93 Mbps (Frontier) to 19.73 Mbps (TWC) and averaging 16.79 Mbps (better than advertised).

At the end of the day though, I get my web sites and data files in a timely manner most of the time so the exact speed doesn&#039;t matter to me because I don&#039;t notice the lack of speed.  If it slowed down significantly I&#039;d probably notice, but fluctuating between 5 Mbps is hard to distinguish.  On the other hand, if I had a 50 Mbps connection downstream and a 10 Mbps connection upstream I&#039;m sure I&#039;d notice a drastic difference.

I will also mention that I had a NAT firewall up during the tests without opening any specific ports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to get my info from several sources and here&#8217;s what they say about my Roadrunner connection (supposed to be 15 Mbps down, 1 Mbps up):</p>
<p>TWC Speed Test (Rochester, NY)<br />
 &#8211; 19.73 Mbps down<br />
 &#8211; 0.97 Mbps up</p>
<p>Frontier<br />
 &#8211; 11.39 Mbps down<br />
 &#8211; 0.95 Mbps up</p>
<p>Broadband.gov (Ookla test)<br />
 &#8211; 17.95 Mbps down<br />
 &#8211; 0.96 Mbps up<br />
 &#8211; 55ms Latency<br />
 &#8211; 7 ms JItter</p>
<p>Broadband.gov (Mlab test)<br />
 &#8211; 16.24 Mbps down<br />
 &#8211; 0.90 Mbps up<br />
 &#8211; 205 ms Latency<br />
 &#8211; 401 ms Jitter</p>
<p>Speedtest.net (Ookla)<br />
 &#8211; 19.53 Mbps down<br />
 &#8211; 0.95 Mbps up<br />
 &#8211; 81 ms Latency</p>
<p>Measurement Lab (mlab)<br />
 &#8211; 15.89 Mbps up<br />
 &#8211; 0.88 Mbps down</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s it all mean?  Well they all pretty much agree I get about 1Mbps up (as advertised), but they disagree a bit about the 15 Mbps down I&#8217;m supposed to get, varying from 11.93 Mbps (Frontier) to 19.73 Mbps (TWC) and averaging 16.79 Mbps (better than advertised).</p>
<p>At the end of the day though, I get my web sites and data files in a timely manner most of the time so the exact speed doesn&#8217;t matter to me because I don&#8217;t notice the lack of speed.  If it slowed down significantly I&#8217;d probably notice, but fluctuating between 5 Mbps is hard to distinguish.  On the other hand, if I had a 50 Mbps connection downstream and a 10 Mbps connection upstream I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;d notice a drastic difference.</p>
<p>I will also mention that I had a NAT firewall up during the tests without opening any specific ports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Ken</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/15/broadband-gov-testing-americas-broadband-speeds-but-questions-arise-about-accuracy-of-test/#comment-9073</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=8376#comment-9073</guid>
		<description>works just fine even with all firewall and protection in place.
D 7292
U 962
LAT 26 ms
Jitter 2 ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>works just fine even with all firewall and protection in place.<br />
D 7292<br />
U 962<br />
LAT 26 ms<br />
Jitter 2 ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tkpvictory3</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/15/broadband-gov-testing-americas-broadband-speeds-but-questions-arise-about-accuracy-of-test/#comment-9047</link>
		<dc:creator>Tkpvictory3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=8376#comment-9047</guid>
		<description>Mine says zero… Oh yea that’s because it’s not available in at my residence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine says zero… Oh yea that’s because it’s not available in at my residence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/15/broadband-gov-testing-americas-broadband-speeds-but-questions-arise-about-accuracy-of-test/#comment-9045</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=8376#comment-9045</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t even run the gov test. The test won&#039;t even show up. It keeps saying I need to install Java, which I have. I have Firefox 3.6 with Java 6.0.18. I even allowed all scripts on the page. Oh well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t even run the gov test. The test won&#8217;t even show up. It keeps saying I need to install Java, which I have. I have Firefox 3.6 with Java 6.0.18. I even allowed all scripts on the page. Oh well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

