<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot Springs Family Gets $16,000 Verizon Wireless Bill for Wireless Data Usage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/08/hot-springs-family-gets-16000-verizon-wireless-bill-for-wireless-data-usage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/08/hot-springs-family-gets-16000-verizon-wireless-bill-for-wireless-data-usage/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:53:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PreventCAPS</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/08/hot-springs-family-gets-16000-verizon-wireless-bill-for-wireless-data-usage/#comment-8978</link>
		<dc:creator>PreventCAPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=8295#comment-8978</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I always thought that cell phone companies should only charge up to the maximum they would charge another customer. However, this won&#039;t happen because the profits of cell phone companies rely on creating an artificially shortened supply of electronic bits (limited plans for internet, texting, and even talking) that artifically inflate the price of these services. And what company would ever sacrafice profits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I always thought that cell phone companies should only charge up to the maximum they would charge another customer. However, this won&#8217;t happen because the profits of cell phone companies rely on creating an artificially shortened supply of electronic bits (limited plans for internet, texting, and even talking) that artifically inflate the price of these services. And what company would ever sacrafice profits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/03/08/hot-springs-family-gets-16000-verizon-wireless-bill-for-wireless-data-usage/#comment-8976</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=8295#comment-8976</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous, the data charges shouldn&#039;t be more than someone with a data plan pays. If the data plan is $100, then the family should pay no more than that. It costs Verizon no more to provide a person without a data plan than someone with a data plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous, the data charges shouldn&#8217;t be more than someone with a data plan pays. If the data plan is $100, then the family should pay no more than that. It costs Verizon no more to provide a person without a data plan than someone with a data plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

