Home » Broadband Speed »Editorial & Site News »Frontier »Internet Overcharging »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband »Verizon » Currently Reading:

Frontier-Verizon Deal Wins Approval in Oregon; Consumer Protections Part of Deal to Gain Approval

Oregon's telephone company service areas

Frontier Communications has won approval to assume control of telephone lines serving 310,000 Oregonians.

The Oregon Public Utilities Commission Friday unanimously approved the transfer of service from Verizon to Frontier as part of a 14-state transaction.

“First and foremost we want to ensure that customers are not harmed by this transaction.  That’s why we are requiring more than 50 conditions, all aimed at making sure customers are not harmed by this sale,” Chairman Lee Beyer said. “In addition, we are requiring Frontier Communications to spend $25 million on expanding high-speed internet access to its Oregon customers by July 2013.”

In return for approval, Frontier agreed to PUC demands for customer service protections:

  • A commitment that Frontier spend at least $25 million to expand high-speed broadband in Oregon by July 2013;
  • No changes in “commission-regulated” retail service plans for at least three years;
  • Costs of the transition must not be paid by customers in the form of rate increases;
  • 90-day window to change long distance carrier without any fees;
  • An independent audit, paid for by Verizon, to ensure Frontier can handle service for those customers affected by the deal;
  • An opt-out provision letting Oregon’s FiOS subscribers terminate their contracts without penalty if Frontier reduces Internet speeds or drops any of its television channels.

What is missing from Oregon’s agreement?

  • A prohibition of Internet Overcharging schemes like Frontier’s 5 gigabyte “acceptable use” policy that potentially limits customer’s broadband use.  Expanded broadband that customers can only use for basic web browsing and e-mail, without fear of exceeding the limit, indefinitely punishes rural Oregonians with no broadband alternatives;
  • A specific definition of what constitutes “broadband” speeds.  Frontier can continue to deliver the 1-3 Mbps it routinely provides to its less urban service areas.  While better than nothing, Oregon regulators could have used the deal as leverage to win 21st century broadband speeds from Frontier, not yesterday’s ‘barely broadband;’
  • Fines and penalties that will punish a provider that does not invest appropriately in high service standards to provide quality service, and a trigger to permit automatic cancellation of operating certificates should Frontier go bankrupt.

Too many of these deals offer upsides for Wall Street and little benefit to consumers, especially those dependent on their landline phone company for basic communications services.  By forcing requirements that prove costly for a provider to renege on, investors will understand their gains will only happen when they are assured Frontier is doing right by their customers, as well as their shareholders.

Oregon is the sixth state to approve the sale.

Frontier currently serves only 12,000 customers in the state, mostly in southwest Oregon, including the communities of Azalea, Canyonville, Cave Junction, Days Creek, Glendale, Myrtle Creek, O’Brien, Riddle, Selma, and Wolf Creek.

The company’s new customers will come mostly from Washington County, east Multnomah County, and from several pockets of customers in the northwestern part of the state.  Oregon’s largest telephone provider is Qwest Communications, but the state has numerous smaller independent providers as well.

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. noway says:

    What about the extra .3 billion that Frontier has to come up with for this deal? Or how about all the millions for all these extras for approval? Why don’t you talk about that?







Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Uncle Ken: Best part of this story is one company letting another piggyback on their working cable till it was sorted out. Shows people still do care. Brings o...
  • tresho: "They would normally be able to assign you a “broadband phone number” instantly." That's what I was expecting. What got to me was their insertio...
  • Phillip Dampier: That activation message telling you to wait a few days is ridiculous, but it is probably there because Virgin Mobile suffered a huge national outage l...
  • Phillip Dampier: When you first activate, you are stuck on their much slower 1xRTT connection, which can be painfully slow. I didn't experience any of these issues ...
  • Phillip Dampier: The Road Runner national help desk is run by a third party company, although I'm not sure that's who you ended up talking with. The agreement says fe...
  • Bill: Phillip writes regarding ESPN3 that: " [...] it also means Road Runner customers who don’t take cable-TV will not have access." This is the way I also...
  • Tim: These Networks are biting off more than they can chew. More and more people are going to drop cable if this keeps happening, which it will. Once that ...
  • agent00kevin: My experience: I bought a Mifi 2200 at WalMart this afternoon + the 40$ card needed for unlimited service. Got everything home, booted up the lapt...
  • tresho: The previous commenters apparently were able to activate their Virgin Mobile service. I wasn't. I bought a MC760 at my local Walmart on Friday after...
  • Will: Thanks for answering my questions. I do have a bit of engineering knowledge on how CDMA 3G EVDO works so your post has answered my questions. So basic...
  • Ron Paul FTW: Sorry... The link to The Creature from Jekyll Island speech was wrong... Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zus8_xl8qUI Find a...
  • Paul: Virgin Mobile's broadband data is obviously being routed differently than Sprint users' data. Sprint is clearly providing less resources to Virgin Mob...

Your Account: