Home » Broadband Speed »Editorial & Site News »Frontier »Internet Overcharging »Public Policy & Gov't »Rural Broadband »Verizon » Currently Reading:

Frontier-Verizon Deal Wins Approval in Oregon; Consumer Protections Part of Deal to Gain Approval

Oregon's telephone company service areas

Frontier Communications has won approval to assume control of telephone lines serving 310,000 Oregonians.

The Oregon Public Utilities Commission Friday unanimously approved the transfer of service from Verizon to Frontier as part of a 14-state transaction.

“First and foremost we want to ensure that customers are not harmed by this transaction.  That’s why we are requiring more than 50 conditions, all aimed at making sure customers are not harmed by this sale,” Chairman Lee Beyer said. “In addition, we are requiring Frontier Communications to spend $25 million on expanding high-speed internet access to its Oregon customers by July 2013.”

In return for approval, Frontier agreed to PUC demands for customer service protections:

  • A commitment that Frontier spend at least $25 million to expand high-speed broadband in Oregon by July 2013;
  • No changes in “commission-regulated” retail service plans for at least three years;
  • Costs of the transition must not be paid by customers in the form of rate increases;
  • 90-day window to change long distance carrier without any fees;
  • An independent audit, paid for by Verizon, to ensure Frontier can handle service for those customers affected by the deal;
  • An opt-out provision letting Oregon’s FiOS subscribers terminate their contracts without penalty if Frontier reduces Internet speeds or drops any of its television channels.

What is missing from Oregon’s agreement?

  • A prohibition of Internet Overcharging schemes like Frontier’s 5 gigabyte “acceptable use” policy that potentially limits customer’s broadband use.  Expanded broadband that customers can only use for basic web browsing and e-mail, without fear of exceeding the limit, indefinitely punishes rural Oregonians with no broadband alternatives;
  • A specific definition of what constitutes “broadband” speeds.  Frontier can continue to deliver the 1-3 Mbps it routinely provides to its less urban service areas.  While better than nothing, Oregon regulators could have used the deal as leverage to win 21st century broadband speeds from Frontier, not yesterday’s ‘barely broadband;’
  • Fines and penalties that will punish a provider that does not invest appropriately in high service standards to provide quality service, and a trigger to permit automatic cancellation of operating certificates should Frontier go bankrupt.

Too many of these deals offer upsides for Wall Street and little benefit to consumers, especially those dependent on their landline phone company for basic communications services.  By forcing requirements that prove costly for a provider to renege on, investors will understand their gains will only happen when they are assured Frontier is doing right by their customers, as well as their shareholders.

Oregon is the sixth state to approve the sale.

Frontier currently serves only 12,000 customers in the state, mostly in southwest Oregon, including the communities of Azalea, Canyonville, Cave Junction, Days Creek, Glendale, Myrtle Creek, O’Brien, Riddle, Selma, and Wolf Creek.

The company’s new customers will come mostly from Washington County, east Multnomah County, and from several pockets of customers in the northwestern part of the state.  Oregon’s largest telephone provider is Qwest Communications, but the state has numerous smaller independent providers as well.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. Frontier Gets Approval of Verizon Deal in California, South Carolina, and Nevada; Attacks Union Opposition in West Virginia
  2. Approve Verizon-Frontier Deal Because Frontier Can’t Do Any Worse for West Virginia?
  3. Frontier DSL: “Slow, Low Quality, and Priced Significantly Higher Than Verizon” Says Expert Hired By WV Consumer Advocate
  4. Opposition Mounts to Verizon-Frontier Deal: Employee Unions Express Concern Consumers Will Get a Raw Deal
  5. Strong Opposition Erupts in West Virginia Opposing Frontier-Verizon Deal: “Too Many Risks” Says State’s Consumer Advocate

Currently there is 1 comment on this Article:

  1. noway says:

    What about the extra .3 billion that Frontier has to come up with for this deal? Or how about all the millions for all these extras for approval? Why don’t you talk about that?

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • nolan: ad says you may get 53 channels ? but 12 is a long way from 53 ! since i can get at least 31 channels with a rca flat antenna for $14.95 from wal-mar...
  • Loons In June!: Hi Riley nice commercial. Isn't Dish Networks TV everywhere just a slingbox? Or am I mistaken? Oh it is. "Dish will begin taking orders for the Vi...
  • Bill Bishop: Please note that these are the same clowns who sell the Heat Surge (you can bag all the glitz and get a thermostatically controlled 1500 watt heater a...
  • Jack J: Read the ad a little more thouroughly. It does not say you can get 953 channels. It says you can recieve approximatly 53 channels in your local area ...
  • Michelle: Thanks for the article... this ad just ran in Pittsburgh yesterday. Will make sure to forward to others! Many Thanks!...
  • Riley: I’m sure many Time Warner customers are happy that they have the ability to stream some channels to their iPhone. The main issue I see with the app is...
  • Ben: It's a nice app, but it's worthless by being limited to your home network! What's the point? If I'm at home, I'll watch on my TV!!! I like the Remote ...
  • jr: Frontier CEO Mary Agnes Wilderotter received $8,584,002 in total compensation in 2010...
  • DJ: Thanks for getting this out there for others to read, I do appreciate it. I do have some slightly good news though, I might be moving!!! No more Fr...
  • fred: No. Now you need a bare minimum of one gigabit (upload and download) for 21st century broadband. 100 megabits is aiming far too low to be competitive....
  • David: Daniel, That is what I set up via my bionic droid smartphone. A WAP2 that acts as the hotspot for my computer. Currently running 8 mb/s on download...
  • Matt: If they don't like the broadband options that are available, they can start their own WISP. That is how most WISPs started out anyway!...

Your Account: