<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Cable&#8217;s Broadband Division Nearing &#8216;Most Important Indicator&#8217; of Company&#8217;s Stock Price Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2010/02/08/time-warner-cables-broadband-division-nearing-most-important-indicator-of-companys-stock-price-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/02/08/time-warner-cables-broadband-division-nearing-most-important-indicator-of-companys-stock-price-future/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1-alpha-15359</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian L</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/02/08/time-warner-cables-broadband-division-nearing-most-important-indicator-of-companys-stock-price-future/comment-page-1/#comment-8658</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=7595#comment-8658</guid>
		<description>Not sure what&#039;s particularly interesting about this analyst. Says TWC is overvalued, and one analyst saying that broadband drives TWC&#039;s price doesn&#039;t mean it does. I&#039;d say that digital phone is under-represented in the mix; it&#039;s the triple play component that takes the most customers away from telcos, last I checked.

As far as broadband goes, I&#039;m guessing TWC will eventually standardize around 768/128, 3/384, 10/1, 15/2 and 50/5. All but 50/5 seem to be aimed at the lower end of the mrket, with pricing below $60. As such, digital cable will keep being TWC&#039;s lifeblood. Compare this with Comcast&#039;s internet tiers that are between $55 and $75 for &quot;standard grade&quot; service depending on speed and you see that one company is aiming for differentiation based on features/speed...and one isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what&#8217;s particularly interesting about this analyst. Says TWC is overvalued, and one analyst saying that broadband drives TWC&#8217;s price doesn&#8217;t mean it does. I&#8217;d say that digital phone is under-represented in the mix; it&#8217;s the triple play component that takes the most customers away from telcos, last I checked.</p>
<p>As far as broadband goes, I&#8217;m guessing TWC will eventually standardize around 768/128, 3/384, 10/1, 15/2 and 50/5. All but 50/5 seem to be aimed at the lower end of the mrket, with pricing below $60. As such, digital cable will keep being TWC&#8217;s lifeblood. Compare this with Comcast&#8217;s internet tiers that are between $55 and $75 for &#8220;standard grade&#8221; service depending on speed and you see that one company is aiming for differentiation based on features/speed&#8230;and one isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
