<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Disclosure? The Self-Interested Who Write Opinion Pieces Opposing Net Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/21/full-disclosure-the-self-interested-who-write-opinion-pieces-opposing-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/21/full-disclosure-the-self-interested-who-write-opinion-pieces-opposing-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chaney</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/21/full-disclosure-the-self-interested-who-write-opinion-pieces-opposing-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-8517</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=7273#comment-8517</guid>
		<description>&quot;Moreover, for streaming applications to work consistently, a network must treat the data stream in a discriminatory manner to ensure quality.&quot;

From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20100120/OPINION01/1200314/Don-t-let-Net-neutrality-rules-fuzz-up-Internet-videos#ixzz0dNGYpixh

Really?!?!  Must the network do that?  That&#039;s quite a statement Mrs. Chicken Little provides with no reasoning or data to back it up.  I find that even on a relatively slow (3 Mbps) connection, I can stream Silverlight video with no hiccups even during peak hours.

I&#039;m pretty sure that investing in your network to make sure it&#039;s sufficient for the traffic required will also ensure quality of streaming data</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Moreover, for streaming applications to work consistently, a network must treat the data stream in a discriminatory manner to ensure quality.&#8221;</p>
<p>From The Detroit News: <a href="http://detnews.com/article/20100120/OPINION01/1200314/Don-t-let-Net-neutrality-rules-fuzz-up-Internet-videos#ixzz0dNGYpixh" rel="nofollow">http://detnews.com/article/20100120/OPINION01/1200314/Don-t-let-Net-neutrality-rules-fuzz-up-Internet-videos#ixzz0dNGYpixh</a></p>
<p>Really?!?!  Must the network do that?  That&#8217;s quite a statement Mrs. Chicken Little provides with no reasoning or data to back it up.  I find that even on a relatively slow (3 Mbps) connection, I can stream Silverlight video with no hiccups even during peak hours.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that investing in your network to make sure it&#8217;s sufficient for the traffic required will also ensure quality of streaming data</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/21/full-disclosure-the-self-interested-who-write-opinion-pieces-opposing-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-8516</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=7273#comment-8516</guid>
		<description>It sure would be nice if authors were required to disclose any financial ties that may bias them like you often find in scientific journal articles. It&#039;s sad how many writers have a clear, selfish purpose for what they write. And I think newspapers should require disclosure of that purpose so I am not insulted when they try to convince me that their selfish argument actually benefits me.

She doesn&#039;t explain in the article why it will make internet more expensive, nor why it will result in &quot;a world of grainy video clips, uneven download times and fewer innovative services.&quot; I&#039;m pretty sure those things already exist. Also its clear to me that some readers of this stuff are braindead and don&#039;t understand net neutrality when they write stuff like &quot;We do not need more &quot;China&quot; like regulation.&quot; Yes, that&#039;s exactly what its like. Ugh, the school system has failed so many people I am stuck in a country full of complete idiots that do not understand how to read and form a logical opinion. TWC/Comcast/ATT, just equate net neutrality with China and you get your way because people are mindless enough to believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sure would be nice if authors were required to disclose any financial ties that may bias them like you often find in scientific journal articles. It&#8217;s sad how many writers have a clear, selfish purpose for what they write. And I think newspapers should require disclosure of that purpose so I am not insulted when they try to convince me that their selfish argument actually benefits me.</p>
<p>She doesn&#8217;t explain in the article why it will make internet more expensive, nor why it will result in &#8220;a world of grainy video clips, uneven download times and fewer innovative services.&#8221; I&#8217;m pretty sure those things already exist. Also its clear to me that some readers of this stuff are braindead and don&#8217;t understand net neutrality when they write stuff like &#8220;We do not need more &#8220;China&#8221; like regulation.&#8221; Yes, that&#8217;s exactly what its like. Ugh, the school system has failed so many people I am stuck in a country full of complete idiots that do not understand how to read and form a logical opinion. TWC/Comcast/ATT, just equate net neutrality with China and you get your way because people are mindless enough to believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: preventCAPS</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/21/full-disclosure-the-self-interested-who-write-opinion-pieces-opposing-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-8499</link>
		<dc:creator>preventCAPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=7273#comment-8499</guid>
		<description>If only we could get Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage to tackle all the myths floated around by the industry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only we could get Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage to tackle all the myths floated around by the industry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

