<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappointing: An Open Letter Rebutting Public Knowledge&#8217;s Lack of Opposition to &#8216;Usage-Based Pricing&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/20/disappointing-an-open-letter-rebutting-public-knowledges-lack-of-opposition-to-usage-based-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/20/disappointing-an-open-letter-rebutting-public-knowledges-lack-of-opposition-to-usage-based-pricing/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Chaney</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/20/disappointing-an-open-letter-rebutting-public-knowledges-lack-of-opposition-to-usage-based-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-8526</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Chaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=7263#comment-8526</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a telling tweet conversation I ran across today:

----------------
Jeff Simmermon, Digital Communications Director for Time Warner Cable

jeffTWC: Hulu&#039;s most popular shows could end up behind paywall http://bit.ly/5JkmxG

jamabam: @jeffTWC do you think this means paywalls on the networks&#039; own sites as well? i actually use them instead of Hulu

jeffTWC: @jamabam I&#039;m hesitant to project. Nobody knows how to make real money from online video right now, but everyone knows it&#039;s got to happen.
----------------

And TWC will try like hell to make sure they get a piece of the pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a telling tweet conversation I ran across today:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Jeff Simmermon, Digital Communications Director for Time Warner Cable</p>
<p>jeffTWC: Hulu&#8217;s most popular shows could end up behind paywall <a href="http://bit.ly/5JkmxG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5JkmxG</a></p>
<p>jamabam: @jeffTWC do you think this means paywalls on the networks&#8217; own sites as well? i actually use them instead of Hulu</p>
<p>jeffTWC: @jamabam I&#8217;m hesitant to project. Nobody knows how to make real money from online video right now, but everyone knows it&#8217;s got to happen.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>And TWC will try like hell to make sure they get a piece of the pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2010/01/20/disappointing-an-open-letter-rebutting-public-knowledges-lack-of-opposition-to-usage-based-pricing/comment-page-1/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=7263#comment-8503</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m almost feel like we&#039;re going back to the &#039;90&#039;s with per minute internet access. Charging by the GB isn&#039;t much different than metering based on the minute to me. Either way your&#039;re limiting transfer or access.

At least back when we had Compuserve, AOL, Genie, etc.. all charging by the minute that was understood by users.. they use a minute.. they paid for a minute of service.

Now most people have no clue what a GB is, how many GB&#039;s they use to do this or that on the web, and as the article says no chance to verify bandwidth used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost feel like we&#8217;re going back to the &#8217;90&#8242;s with per minute internet access. Charging by the GB isn&#8217;t much different than metering based on the minute to me. Either way your&#8217;re limiting transfer or access.</p>
<p>At least back when we had Compuserve, AOL, Genie, etc.. all charging by the minute that was understood by users.. they use a minute.. they paid for a minute of service.</p>
<p>Now most people have no clue what a GB is, how many GB&#8217;s they use to do this or that on the web, and as the article says no chance to verify bandwidth used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

