<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Government Overturns CRTC, Admits Globalive&#8217;s Wind Mobile to Canadian Mobile Phone Marketplace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2009/12/19/canadian-government-overturns-crtc-admits-globalives-wind-mobile-to-canadian-mobile-phone-marketplace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/12/19/canadian-government-overturns-crtc-admits-globalives-wind-mobile-to-canadian-mobile-phone-marketplace/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1-alpha-15359</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trusted Creation</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/12/19/canadian-government-overturns-crtc-admits-globalives-wind-mobile-to-canadian-mobile-phone-marketplace/comment-page-1/#comment-8247</link>
		<dc:creator>Trusted Creation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=6606#comment-8247</guid>
		<description>Wind mobile is great except for their phone selection... so i made a list of phones that are compatible with wind mobile and have the 1700 mhz band..

http://unlockingabc.blogspot.com/2010/01/wind-mobile-compatible-phones.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind mobile is great except for their phone selection&#8230; so i made a list of phones that are compatible with wind mobile and have the 1700 mhz band..</p>
<p><a href="http://unlockingabc.blogspot.com/2010/01/wind-mobile-compatible-phones.html" rel="nofollow">http://unlockingabc.blogspot.com/2010/01/wind-mobile-compatible-phones.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian L</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/12/19/canadian-government-overturns-crtc-admits-globalives-wind-mobile-to-canadian-mobile-phone-marketplace/comment-page-1/#comment-8076</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=6606#comment-8076</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, while it&#039;s not hypocritical for Telus, Bell and Rogers to cry foul on 81% of Globalive&#039;s funding coming from abroad, it&#039;s just plain dumb to turn away capital that doesn&#039;t involve selling your soul to an outside entity and will result in more jobs, competition, etc. in the marketplace. If Wind Mobile&#039;s support was handled by Orascom it&#039;d be a different deal but that isn&#039;t the case here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, while it&#8217;s not hypocritical for Telus, Bell and Rogers to cry foul on 81% of Globalive&#8217;s funding coming from abroad, it&#8217;s just plain dumb to turn away capital that doesn&#8217;t involve selling your soul to an outside entity and will result in more jobs, competition, etc. in the marketplace. If Wind Mobile&#8217;s support was handled by Orascom it&#8217;d be a different deal but that isn&#8217;t the case here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian L</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/12/19/canadian-government-overturns-crtc-admits-globalives-wind-mobile-to-canadian-mobile-phone-marketplace/comment-page-1/#comment-8074</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=6606#comment-8074</guid>
		<description>Seems like Wind is doing everything right, though does anyone else feel like this is a redo of Fido, before it was purchased by Rogers?

There are a few things that Wind doesn&#039;t have right now in addition to nationwide coverage. First, their data network tops out at 7.2 Mbps versus Rogers&#039;, Bell&#039;s and Telus&#039;s new HSPA+ networks (probably easy to remedy though). Second, they don&#039;t have the iPhone, something Bell, Telus and Roges have, though apparently none of those carriers have faith in that device to keep their customer base intact.

Then again, when you&#039;re charging for long distance and Wind isn&#039;t, when you&#039;re charging for incoming texts and Wind isn&#039;t, when you&#039;re wanting $80 for 5GB MBB and Wind wants $55, and when you charge tons of extra fees and Wind doesn&#039;t...it sounds like Wind wins by having a better product. Whoda thunk?

Also, for what it&#039;s worth, my town of roughly 10,000 is serviced by SEVEN cellular carriers. The four nationals, three of which have 3G here, plus CricKet (sorta-national, also with 3G), plus a regional unlimited carrier with a high-capacity CDMA 1x network and bargain-basement prices, plus a hometown carrier that has a GSM network, a legacy CDMA network in our area, is owned by a telephone cooperative a ways north of us and offers BlackBerry-based family plans that nobody can touch. Over the years, competition in every area of wireless has grown for us, not shrunk...AT&amp;T bought CellularOne and thus brought their service here, Pocket Communications didn&#039;t exist four years ago, and Sprint used to only be good in town.

If Rogers/Telus&#039; logic was applied to wireless service in the U.S., there DEFINITELY wouldn&#039;t be enough business to go around for cellular providers, since most places have four or more carriers competing for service. lso, we&#039;d have an outdated Voicestream rather than a progressive T-Mobile because Deutsche Telekom couldn&#039;t have come in and bought the GSM carrier several years ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Wind is doing everything right, though does anyone else feel like this is a redo of Fido, before it was purchased by Rogers?</p>
<p>There are a few things that Wind doesn&#8217;t have right now in addition to nationwide coverage. First, their data network tops out at 7.2 Mbps versus Rogers&#8217;, Bell&#8217;s and Telus&#8217;s new HSPA+ networks (probably easy to remedy though). Second, they don&#8217;t have the iPhone, something Bell, Telus and Roges have, though apparently none of those carriers have faith in that device to keep their customer base intact.</p>
<p>Then again, when you&#8217;re charging for long distance and Wind isn&#8217;t, when you&#8217;re charging for incoming texts and Wind isn&#8217;t, when you&#8217;re wanting $80 for 5GB MBB and Wind wants $55, and when you charge tons of extra fees and Wind doesn&#8217;t&#8230;it sounds like Wind wins by having a better product. Whoda thunk?</p>
<p>Also, for what it&#8217;s worth, my town of roughly 10,000 is serviced by SEVEN cellular carriers. The four nationals, three of which have 3G here, plus CricKet (sorta-national, also with 3G), plus a regional unlimited carrier with a high-capacity CDMA 1x network and bargain-basement prices, plus a hometown carrier that has a GSM network, a legacy CDMA network in our area, is owned by a telephone cooperative a ways north of us and offers BlackBerry-based family plans that nobody can touch. Over the years, competition in every area of wireless has grown for us, not shrunk&#8230;AT&amp;T bought CellularOne and thus brought their service here, Pocket Communications didn&#8217;t exist four years ago, and Sprint used to only be good in town.</p>
<p>If Rogers/Telus&#8217; logic was applied to wireless service in the U.S., there DEFINITELY wouldn&#8217;t be enough business to go around for cellular providers, since most places have four or more carriers competing for service. lso, we&#8217;d have an outdated Voicestream rather than a progressive T-Mobile because Deutsche Telekom couldn&#8217;t have come in and bought the GSM carrier several years ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
