Home » Comcast/Xfinity »Internet Overcharging »Issues » Currently Reading:

Mozy On Through Your Usage Allowance With Comcast ‘Secure Backup & Share’

Phillip Dampier December 11, 2009 Comcast/Xfinity, Internet Overcharging, Issues 3 Comments

comcastbackupOne service the usage cap-happy broadband industry will be certain to threaten is online file backup.  Consumers who don’t know any better can easily configure software to back up entire hard drives to a remote hard drive, blowing through an online usage allowance in a matter of days.  Even usage allowances as large as Comcast’s 250GB per month are no match for today’s super-sized hard drives.

So it comes with a bit of irony that Comcast has quietly launched its new Secure Backup & Share service, “powered by” Mozy.

Every Comcast broadband customer will soon be pelted with promotions for the new free add-on, which will initially provide 2GB of storage space.  The free version is enough to backup small collections of music, photos, and documents, and probably won’t hurt your allowance too much.  But Mozy gets to up-sell customers to their much-larger capacity plans right from the home page.  A year’s worth of 50GB of storage costs $50.  Get 200GB of storage space for $100 a year.

Exceeding 250GB of usage per month, with or without the service, will potentially get you a warning letter and then an account suspension.

Bonus points to you if you can find the 250GB usage limit disclosed on the home page for the service.

For providers who try for far lower usage allowances, or charge up to $2 per gigabyte after exceeding them, an online file backup service could make your provider’s day once they send you the bill.




Share

Other stories of interest:

  1. One Year After Imposing 250GB Cap, Comcast Customers Still In The Dark About Their Usage
  2. Comcast Announces 250GB Monthly Cap On Broadband Users Effective October 1st
  3. New Zealand ISP Exempts YouTube From Usage Allowance Annoyance Until January 2010
  4. How to Blow Through Comcast’s 250GB Usage Cap In Five Hours
  5. Cashing In On Usage Based Price Gouging

Currently there are 3 comments on this Article:

  1. jr says:

    Look at these executive salaries at Comcast in 2008 http://www.companypay.com/executive/compensation/comcast-corp.asp?yr=2008 I’m sure the Comcast shill commenter will pull the “great deal!” card again

  2. Thomas Troy Veldhouse says:

    I just called Comcast last night and asked about their service and the usage cap and I was told that the backup service does not count against their usage cap. I will double check this with another call today.

    I also wonder, then, if they are being anti-competitive. They essentially limit large backup (~200GB) to use their service or risk going over the usage cap. What if I sign up with Moxy directly; will that apply to the usage cap? How about a competitive service such as Carbonite or the new favorite Dropbox?

    I see legal issues galore over the way this service is offered. For instance, I am not interested in file sharing much; for that I use either Google Documents or for larger things, my 2GB DropBox account (which maybe I will expand as I fill it). If my drive crashes, and I use a non-Comcast backup service, it is not even possible to do a restore unless I do it over several months [and that may not be possible with some providers which maintain a backup for 30 days] or go over the 250GB limit and get my threat email from Comcast. These are all issues I intend to get answered from Comcast before long, if I can ever get a knowledgeable person online.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Jeremy: Keep it up Crime Warner, Google will soon be a competitor of yours here in KC and then I can dump your internet and atrocious cable/cable box....
  • Mileena: Welp, just let us know when we have to start protesting......
  • Phillip Dampier: I love the industry argument that network builds in rural area just don't make sense. But they still manage to fund lobbying campaigns to keep munici...
  • Phillip Dampier: Verizon FiOS is deregulated. In fact, both Verizon and AT&T have fought for the ultimate in "hands off" telecom regulation: the statewide franchise f...
  • Phillip Dampier: I am more convinced than ever Genachowski is not going to stay as chairman during a second Obama administration. He was angling for a position at the ...
  • Phillip Dampier: You are evidently a new reader here. Service complaints, outages, and policy changes for TV, broadband, and phone service have all been covered here f...
  • Phillip Dampier: I think I answered your question. I don't have any problem with customers being able to roam on cable Wi-Fi networks. You are the one using the wor...
  • Scott: Last I checked Marriott and Cadillac dealerships weren't essential services that affect citizens access to public online services, education, and gene...
  • Jordan Kratz: Genachowski is just as Corrupt as the rest of this Government.Within 5 - 20 years i am more and more believing a real revolution or a complete falling...
  • Jeremy: "It just depends on who has his ear the most." It's definitely not us little American consumers....
  • thad: Either Genachowski is ignorant (which as the FCC chairman he is paid not to be) or he is working to the benefit of current, traditional, Teleco behemo...
  • Sean: A phone company says having customers with working phones is a harmful business model? WTH?...

Your Account: