<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frontier Gets Approval of Verizon Deal in California, South Carolina, and Nevada; Attacks Union Opposition in West Virginia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Usage Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smith6612</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7309</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith6612</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7309</guid>
		<description>@Tim: My monitors do run at 2560x1600 (max my video cards will go) so things can get pretty big if I were to record at that resolution. That particular game video I recorded at 1280x720-30 since that is what YouTube will take. I had the game&#039;s Anti-Aliasing turned half-way up as well. As for what is going on in the plane, that&#039;s typically always been like that. It might be an issue with the texture quality being poor in some parts of he game (the game was stressful to hardware back then as it was).

But I can see what you&#039;re talking about. I&#039;ll see what I can do to fix that up. The Codec does have a few settings which allow me to change such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim: My monitors do run at 2560&#215;1600 (max my video cards will go) so things can get pretty big if I were to record at that resolution. That particular game video I recorded at 1280&#215;720-30 since that is what YouTube will take. I had the game&#8217;s Anti-Aliasing turned half-way up as well. As for what is going on in the plane, that&#8217;s typically always been like that. It might be an issue with the texture quality being poor in some parts of he game (the game was stressful to hardware back then as it was).</p>
<p>But I can see what you&#8217;re talking about. I&#8217;ll see what I can do to fix that up. The Codec does have a few settings which allow me to change such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7304</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7304</guid>
		<description>@smith6612

Watched parts of the video and it is hard to tell if the anomalies are due to the video compression or the game itself, like graphics settings sort of low or off like Anti-Aliasing. I notice blocking issues at the beginning with blacks. Also, at 6:30, looks like Aliasing. Also, some parts, like in the aircraft look grainy, Quantisation Noise. 

http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~nd/surprise_96/journal/vol4/sab/report.html

Look at part 6.

Also, another thing to consider is monitor resolution. My monitor is at a resolution of 1920x1200x32, 2,304,000 pixels compared to 921,600, 2.5 x more pixels.  If the video is shot at a lower resolution than what my desktop is set at, the imperfections are more apparent than watching it at what the video was shot at. 

I guess I have a good eye for this stuff. My wife thinks I am too critical but a trained eye can spot this stuff. I am especially critical of lossy compression schemes not only in video but audio. MP3&#039;s I think are the worst and have destroyed music. Throw in dynamic range compression, jacking up the loudness, and converting to a lossy format and you have yourself a recipe for a pile of crap. 

One of the best youtube movies I have seen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H09xnhlCQU .The Hunt For Gollum. It actually looked alright on my 50&quot; Plasma TV. Pause the picture and look at peoples faces. You should see squares, full screen of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@smith6612</p>
<p>Watched parts of the video and it is hard to tell if the anomalies are due to the video compression or the game itself, like graphics settings sort of low or off like Anti-Aliasing. I notice blocking issues at the beginning with blacks. Also, at 6:30, looks like Aliasing. Also, some parts, like in the aircraft look grainy, Quantisation Noise. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~nd/surprise_96/journal/vol4/sab/report.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~nd/surprise_96/journal/vol4/sab/report.html</a></p>
<p>Look at part 6.</p>
<p>Also, another thing to consider is monitor resolution. My monitor is at a resolution of 1920&#215;1200x32, 2,304,000 pixels compared to 921,600, 2.5 x more pixels.  If the video is shot at a lower resolution than what my desktop is set at, the imperfections are more apparent than watching it at what the video was shot at. </p>
<p>I guess I have a good eye for this stuff. My wife thinks I am too critical but a trained eye can spot this stuff. I am especially critical of lossy compression schemes not only in video but audio. MP3&#8217;s I think are the worst and have destroyed music. Throw in dynamic range compression, jacking up the loudness, and converting to a lossy format and you have yourself a recipe for a pile of crap. </p>
<p>One of the best youtube movies I have seen <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H09xnhlCQU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H09xnhlCQU</a> .The Hunt For Gollum. It actually looked alright on my 50&#8243; Plasma TV. Pause the picture and look at peoples faces. You should see squares, full screen of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith6612</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7301</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith6612</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7301</guid>
		<description>Ah. I was wondering about that. For the most part I never really noticed such things taking place on my satellite TV service, unless it&#039;s something like a sports game but the blocking clears up almost immediately or even then is very faint. Also, when I encode it, it doesn&#039;t lead me to think it&#039;s compression initially as when it does block up, it really only happens in a corner of the image and will disappear whenever a color change takes place (where the sharpness immediately comes back too) and then if I come across more dark scenes, it doesn&#039;t block up one bit. If it is compression or codec issues, doesn&#039;t really bug me but here&#039;s an example of what I&#039;m talking about on YouTube. The YouTube HD video shows the blocking appearing as it does on the original source video (10Mbps).

I found an option in the Codec settings called De-blocking Strength. I might play around with that a little bit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5nWc3Nl2FY&amp;fmt=22 (Look around 6:30 and beyond. That&#039;s where it happens). Of course, the quality is almost like the AVI files FRAPS exported in the original file, so YouTube did kill it a bit as well. The blocking only happened twice as well, so everything else is set. Feel free to watch the video fully though to see if you notice anything funny caused by the compression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. I was wondering about that. For the most part I never really noticed such things taking place on my satellite TV service, unless it&#8217;s something like a sports game but the blocking clears up almost immediately or even then is very faint. Also, when I encode it, it doesn&#8217;t lead me to think it&#8217;s compression initially as when it does block up, it really only happens in a corner of the image and will disappear whenever a color change takes place (where the sharpness immediately comes back too) and then if I come across more dark scenes, it doesn&#8217;t block up one bit. If it is compression or codec issues, doesn&#8217;t really bug me but here&#8217;s an example of what I&#8217;m talking about on YouTube. The YouTube HD video shows the blocking appearing as it does on the original source video (10Mbps).</p>
<p>I found an option in the Codec settings called De-blocking Strength. I might play around with that a little bit.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5nWc3Nl2FY&amp;fmt=22" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5nWc3Nl2FY&amp;fmt=22</a> (Look around 6:30 and beyond. That&#8217;s where it happens). Of course, the quality is almost like the AVI files FRAPS exported in the original file, so YouTube did kill it a bit as well. The blocking only happened twice as well, so everything else is set. Feel free to watch the video fully though to see if you notice anything funny caused by the compression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7294</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7294</guid>
		<description>@smith6612

&quot;I have noticed that with my 10Mbps video if I get scenes where it’s very dark it’ll start to block up a lot. I’m not sure if that’s due to the way the codec is, VirtualDUB or the settings I have in it, but I’ll probably experiment with that the next time I export a video.&quot;

It is due to compression. Satellite TV suffers from it too. It is just one of things that you get from over compression of the video. Think about it, the original HD video might require 1Gb/sec bandwidth uncompressed. Then you take something like mpeg 2, just for example what ATSC, that compresses the video down 20Mb/sec, 500:1 compression. That kind of compression, you lose a lot of information. 

I use to use a program called DVD Shrink. It did really good if you check the deep analysis and adaptive correction options. Otherwise, if you didn&#039;t, you could look at peoples faces on scenes, and see the video &quot;morphing&quot;. I still see it with low bit rate video. Also, your colors look washed out also. However, this is hard to ascertain because you don&#039;t usually have a superior source to compare. There are other kind of anomalies that pop up that I didn&#039;t mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@smith6612</p>
<p>&#8220;I have noticed that with my 10Mbps video if I get scenes where it’s very dark it’ll start to block up a lot. I’m not sure if that’s due to the way the codec is, VirtualDUB or the settings I have in it, but I’ll probably experiment with that the next time I export a video.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is due to compression. Satellite TV suffers from it too. It is just one of things that you get from over compression of the video. Think about it, the original HD video might require 1Gb/sec bandwidth uncompressed. Then you take something like mpeg 2, just for example what ATSC, that compresses the video down 20Mb/sec, 500:1 compression. That kind of compression, you lose a lot of information. </p>
<p>I use to use a program called DVD Shrink. It did really good if you check the deep analysis and adaptive correction options. Otherwise, if you didn&#8217;t, you could look at peoples faces on scenes, and see the video &#8220;morphing&#8221;. I still see it with low bit rate video. Also, your colors look washed out also. However, this is hard to ascertain because you don&#8217;t usually have a superior source to compare. There are other kind of anomalies that pop up that I didn&#8217;t mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith6612</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7290</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith6612</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7290</guid>
		<description>I have noticed that with my 10Mbps video if I get scenes where it&#039;s very dark it&#039;ll start to block up a lot. I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s due to the way the codec is, VirtualDUB or the settings I have in it, but I&#039;ll probably experiment with that the next time I export a video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed that with my 10Mbps video if I get scenes where it&#8217;s very dark it&#8217;ll start to block up a lot. I&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s due to the way the codec is, VirtualDUB or the settings I have in it, but I&#8217;ll probably experiment with that the next time I export a video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7287</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7287</guid>
		<description>@Smith6612

Yea 10Mb/sec is a pretty good rate. I watch some 720p movies that are 4.37GB in size that are 5.5Mb/sec bit rate encoded in MKV and DTS 5.1 Audio. Some 720p video I have downloaded is double that. However straight off the air stuff, for a 42 minute show, I have seen files around 4GB or 14Mb/sec. I download x264, just h.264/mpeg4 avc, too and it is good also. You might get away with watching video at a lower bit rate if you watched it on a small monitor or tv. I usually send the video to my 50&quot; Plasma TV. You can see anomalies such as when there are deep blacks on the sceen, it gets really &quot;blocky&quot;  or areas of the screen &quot;morph&quot; from over compression. I think the minimum for decent 720p quality is at least 5.5Mb/sec bit rate. Anything less and you start to see a lot of artifacts and anomalies from over compression. Most 1080p content I have seen has been compressed down to a DVD9 size. However, straight off a Bluray, 42GB content would be around 46Mb/sec bandwidth, 2 hour movie. Either way, it requires good bandwidth to take HQ HD streams, 10Mb/sec+.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Smith6612</p>
<p>Yea 10Mb/sec is a pretty good rate. I watch some 720p movies that are 4.37GB in size that are 5.5Mb/sec bit rate encoded in MKV and DTS 5.1 Audio. Some 720p video I have downloaded is double that. However straight off the air stuff, for a 42 minute show, I have seen files around 4GB or 14Mb/sec. I download x264, just h.264/mpeg4 avc, too and it is good also. You might get away with watching video at a lower bit rate if you watched it on a small monitor or tv. I usually send the video to my 50&#8243; Plasma TV. You can see anomalies such as when there are deep blacks on the sceen, it gets really &#8220;blocky&#8221;  or areas of the screen &#8220;morph&#8221; from over compression. I think the minimum for decent 720p quality is at least 5.5Mb/sec bit rate. Anything less and you start to see a lot of artifacts and anomalies from over compression. Most 1080p content I have seen has been compressed down to a DVD9 size. However, straight off a Bluray, 42GB content would be around 46Mb/sec bandwidth, 2 hour movie. Either way, it requires good bandwidth to take HQ HD streams, 10Mb/sec+.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith6612</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7285</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith6612</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7285</guid>
		<description>Of course. Off-the-air/FiOS TV at this moment is pretty much the best way to compare 720p sources. Would some of my 10Mbps 720p video work for that comparison? It looks pretty good being encoded in the x264 format and close to the original quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course. Off-the-air/FiOS TV at this moment is pretty much the best way to compare 720p sources. Would some of my 10Mbps 720p video work for that comparison? It looks pretty good being encoded in the x264 format and close to the original quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7282</guid>
		<description>Youtube 720p video? I don&#039;t think so. I always compare any 720p source to what I get over the air. Uverse I think allocates 6Mb/sec for HD 720p/1080i. Over the air, it is 19.39Mb/sec from what I understand. I can tell a difference. Cable HD is even worse. I see artifacts all the time on my mothers TV from her cable connection. I have watched Youtube HD video and it sure as hell isn&#039;t HD. HD, the word or tag, has been thrown around so much it is almost a cliche now. I saw lossless music being called HD which is just CD quality! HD audio? Ok. I think true uncompressed 720p and 1080p video would require over 1Gb/sec bandwidth so you can see how compressed the video and audio already are when you actually get to watch it. Even watching a 1080p Bluray, your video is STILL compressed so it can fit below the 48Mb/sec bandwidth of that Bluray player. 

The more you compress using a lossy compression scheme, the less you see or hear. Also, since that compression scheme is lossy, you have just lost parts of your video or music forever; hence, the reason why you can&#039;t simply decompress it and get the original back. MP3 is a prime example of what I am talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube 720p video? I don&#8217;t think so. I always compare any 720p source to what I get over the air. Uverse I think allocates 6Mb/sec for HD 720p/1080i. Over the air, it is 19.39Mb/sec from what I understand. I can tell a difference. Cable HD is even worse. I see artifacts all the time on my mothers TV from her cable connection. I have watched Youtube HD video and it sure as hell isn&#8217;t HD. HD, the word or tag, has been thrown around so much it is almost a cliche now. I saw lossless music being called HD which is just CD quality! HD audio? Ok. I think true uncompressed 720p and 1080p video would require over 1Gb/sec bandwidth so you can see how compressed the video and audio already are when you actually get to watch it. Even watching a 1080p Bluray, your video is STILL compressed so it can fit below the 48Mb/sec bandwidth of that Bluray player. </p>
<p>The more you compress using a lossy compression scheme, the less you see or hear. Also, since that compression scheme is lossy, you have just lost parts of your video or music forever; hence, the reason why you can&#8217;t simply decompress it and get the original back. MP3 is a prime example of what I am talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Dafoe</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7281</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Dafoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7281</guid>
		<description>Netflix can stream HD movies to the XBOX 360 and has for a while now.

I think I read somewhere that when Netflix camoe out with the Xbox360 stremaing they added a ton of new people and their streaming side was being taxed.

I stream at least 2 movies a week through my xbox360.  I also end up streaming at least 1 TV show a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netflix can stream HD movies to the XBOX 360 and has for a while now.</p>
<p>I think I read somewhere that when Netflix camoe out with the Xbox360 stremaing they added a ton of new people and their streaming side was being taxed.</p>
<p>I stream at least 2 movies a week through my xbox360.  I also end up streaming at least 1 TV show a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith6612</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/30/frontier-gets-approval-of-verizon-deal-in-california-south-carolina-and-nevada-attacks-union-opposition-in-west-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-7280</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith6612</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5644#comment-7280</guid>
		<description>I know that Netflix does stream in Standard Definition. The thing is, with 720p video that you&#039;ll find on sites like YouTube, it does look pretty good as a change. It still doesn&#039;t look as sharp or as good as it would normally look on a 7Mbps 720p stream, as those streams are encoded for 3Mbps connections. Now, for the most part my Frontier line which tests at 3200kbps download, it gives just enough bandwidth to slip by without buffering, however if I take a few seconds and load up a web page, the video will buffer due to a lack of bandwidth.

I have heard of Netflix maxing out 10Mbps connections for an hour or two, so I&#039;d assume that the quality there is pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Netflix does stream in Standard Definition. The thing is, with 720p video that you&#8217;ll find on sites like YouTube, it does look pretty good as a change. It still doesn&#8217;t look as sharp or as good as it would normally look on a 7Mbps 720p stream, as those streams are encoded for 3Mbps connections. Now, for the most part my Frontier line which tests at 3200kbps download, it gives just enough bandwidth to slip by without buffering, however if I take a few seconds and load up a web page, the video will buffer due to a lack of bandwidth.</p>
<p>I have heard of Netflix maxing out 10Mbps connections for an hour or two, so I&#8217;d assume that the quality there is pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
