Currently there are 11 comments on this Article:

  1. waiting and watching says:

    Wait what? Is this article not complete, or am I missing a joke here or something? How much of that $5 does Blizzard get per month, or EA. Why in the hell would I pay for the “privilege” to use eBay/Paypal. Want to charge me to use online banking from my bank as well? I sure as hell won’t pay for that TWICE!

  2. Ian L says:

    It’s someone’s whacked out view of what the Internet would be without net neutrality.

    In reality, companies like Comcast peer with most websites you access on a daily basis, or their parent networks. One notable exception: Google.

    • Tim says:

      Actually, I don’t think it is “whacked” out. All you need to do is look at wireless carriers and how they nickel and dime you on everything. I know VZW, they nickel and dime you for turning on your phone. My phone can’t even burp without Verizon trying to charge me for something. So no, this isn’t too far from reality. Matter of fact, I think this is what these ISP’s want. Their TV biz is on the decline so why not nickel and dime you for the internet?

      • Ian L says:

        If you’re on a data-only plan you get all your data included, up to a certain GB cap. My Sprint plan is all-inclusive. Basically if you’re on a nickel-and-dime plan (text or data mainly) you’re on the wrong plan. Voice and text have become commodities at the unlimited level.

    • Ron Dafoe says:

      It is all in fun, but honestly, it reads like a cable/satellite package or a wireless phone plan.

      While maybe over the top, I worry that this type of thing will happen with caps. Just that you can purchase tiers of websites that will not count against your cap when purchased – or – certain partners will not count against your cap while other like sites will.

  3. Smith6612 says:

    Well, as I’ve voiced before doing this is a bad move. I’m going to be writing up a blog entry expressing my feelings on this subject shortly anyways. I don’t need to wind up having my Internet bill looking like my Satellite bill which is quite hefty.

  4. waiting and watching says:

    Verizon Wireless… :rofl: Yeah they are pretty dumb. But Since this site should be family friendly I won’t get into what I have told them in the past about their bills and charges. So this is a mock up of what TeleComms think they can do. Well I doubt those businesses that will lose customers like Paypal/eBay, and those others would fight this before it comes to fruition, as well any politician that wants to be re-elected…EVER, or ever employed again for that matter. It does kidn of make the statement about TeleComms and how in USA we are living in a sort of “Lord of the Flies” society, and we need top prevent it before we fully reach that state of affairs.

  5. It’s a piece of satire wedding the cable industry’s love for mini-packs and bundles with a non-Net Neutral, Internet Overcharging broadband industry, with the end result being third party websites carrying arbitrary subscription fees made up and pocketed by broadband providers.

    Consider it our equivalent of an editorial cartoon.

  6. waiting and watching says:

    You did it so well Phil, that I thought it was real with all the other crazy stuff TeleComms are doing these days! But it is funny now that I know it isn’t real, but you really shouldn’t give them any more ideas. :lol:

  7. Uncle Ken says:

    I considered it a possible future. As I read the pictures I saw
    some very powerful companies that would never let this happen.
    I would think one would see internet WW3. This was a good wake
    up call.

    • Smith6612 says:

      May I just add, apparently the RIAA is in favor of Net Neutrality now. I wonder about the MPAA if they are up to it or not. Get them on board and you pretty much have the entire entertainment industry.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • James R Bivins: I know how satellite internet works,it signal comes from space and cable comes from on electric poles that cable run pole to pole.I have satellite int...
  • Tim Johnson: It seems like a lot of people are truly stupid...haha...of course cable is much cheaper! satellite companies are not trying to compete with cable serv...
  • Tim Johnson: Stop the cap? Are you serious? You have a whole website based on non-sense? It appears that you do not understand how satellite internet service works...
  • Paul: Very interesting and sure glad I went on-line to look up this company. The ad just appeared in the Dallas area Feb 10, 2012, and glad to know it's a s...
  • Loons In June!: No its not. Its hooked to a Cisco TW Cable DVR. The point I was making is that Riley Is comparing the TW App with what is effectively an overpriced sl...
  • Ben: Is your Slingbox an HD satellite receiver with 1TB DVR?...
  • nolan: ad says you may get 53 channels ? but 12 is a long way from 53 ! since i can get at least 31 channels with a rca flat antenna for $14.95 from wal-mar...
  • Loons In June!: Hi Riley nice commercial. Isn't Dish Networks TV everywhere just a slingbox? Or am I mistaken? Oh it is. "Dish will begin taking orders for the Vi...
  • Bill Bishop: Please note that these are the same clowns who sell the Heat Surge (you can bag all the glitz and get a thermostatically controlled 1500 watt heater a...
  • Jack J: Read the ad a little more thouroughly. It does not say you can get 953 channels. It says you can recieve approximatly 53 channels in your local area ...
  • Michelle: Thanks for the article... this ad just ran in Pittsburgh yesterday. Will make sure to forward to others! Many Thanks!...
  • Riley: I’m sure many Time Warner customers are happy that they have the ability to stream some channels to their iPhone. The main issue I see with the app is...

Your Account: