Currently there are 11 comments on this Article:

  1. waiting and watching says:

    Wait what? Is this article not complete, or am I missing a joke here or something? How much of that $5 does Blizzard get per month, or EA. Why in the hell would I pay for the “privilege” to use eBay/Paypal. Want to charge me to use online banking from my bank as well? I sure as hell won’t pay for that TWICE!

  2. Ian L says:

    It’s someone’s whacked out view of what the Internet would be without net neutrality.

    In reality, companies like Comcast peer with most websites you access on a daily basis, or their parent networks. One notable exception: Google.

    • Tim says:

      Actually, I don’t think it is “whacked” out. All you need to do is look at wireless carriers and how they nickel and dime you on everything. I know VZW, they nickel and dime you for turning on your phone. My phone can’t even burp without Verizon trying to charge me for something. So no, this isn’t too far from reality. Matter of fact, I think this is what these ISP’s want. Their TV biz is on the decline so why not nickel and dime you for the internet?

      • Ian L says:

        If you’re on a data-only plan you get all your data included, up to a certain GB cap. My Sprint plan is all-inclusive. Basically if you’re on a nickel-and-dime plan (text or data mainly) you’re on the wrong plan. Voice and text have become commodities at the unlimited level.

    • Ron Dafoe says:

      It is all in fun, but honestly, it reads like a cable/satellite package or a wireless phone plan.

      While maybe over the top, I worry that this type of thing will happen with caps. Just that you can purchase tiers of websites that will not count against your cap when purchased – or – certain partners will not count against your cap while other like sites will.

  3. Smith6612 says:

    Well, as I’ve voiced before doing this is a bad move. I’m going to be writing up a blog entry expressing my feelings on this subject shortly anyways. I don’t need to wind up having my Internet bill looking like my Satellite bill which is quite hefty.

  4. waiting and watching says:

    Verizon Wireless… :rofl: Yeah they are pretty dumb. But Since this site should be family friendly I won’t get into what I have told them in the past about their bills and charges. So this is a mock up of what TeleComms think they can do. Well I doubt those businesses that will lose customers like Paypal/eBay, and those others would fight this before it comes to fruition, as well any politician that wants to be re-elected…EVER, or ever employed again for that matter. It does kidn of make the statement about TeleComms and how in USA we are living in a sort of “Lord of the Flies” society, and we need top prevent it before we fully reach that state of affairs.

  5. It’s a piece of satire wedding the cable industry’s love for mini-packs and bundles with a non-Net Neutral, Internet Overcharging broadband industry, with the end result being third party websites carrying arbitrary subscription fees made up and pocketed by broadband providers.

    Consider it our equivalent of an editorial cartoon.

  6. waiting and watching says:

    You did it so well Phil, that I thought it was real with all the other crazy stuff TeleComms are doing these days! But it is funny now that I know it isn’t real, but you really shouldn’t give them any more ideas. :lol:

  7. Uncle Ken says:

    I considered it a possible future. As I read the pictures I saw
    some very powerful companies that would never let this happen.
    I would think one would see internet WW3. This was a good wake
    up call.

    • Smith6612 says:

      May I just add, apparently the RIAA is in favor of Net Neutrality now. I wonder about the MPAA if they are up to it or not. Get them on board and you pretty much have the entire entertainment industry.

Search This Site:

Contributions:

Recent Comments:

  • Ron: What a bunch of dumb ass idiots you all are. If you fools fall for a marketing ploy like this piece of crap then you deserve to get screwed. Doesn't a...
  • Earl: I thought AT$T had already lobbied for legislation against this in Ohio....
  • Andrew Madigan: It was conditional to allow the company to try to prove that they had a way around the interference. They didn't have any way to avoid interference, ...
  • Phillip Dampier: I believe Verizon kicked in some additional routers for free, if I recall correctly, but that probably turned into a grand write-off of equipment they...
  • Jerry: Comcast may be the favorite in Fort Wayne but I remember when they were tossed out of Southern California for poor service. I am no way a fran of...
  • Keania: @Audie, Customer service is available from Mon-Wed: 8:30am – 9:00pm, Thurs: 9:00am – 9:00pm and Fri: 8:30am – 9:00pm If you every need clarification o...
  • dorothy grun ewald: i have filled out the forms with the asistance of the att.gen office and yet to recieve refund and am still being charged for roadside assistance, af...
  • George Douglas: The vendor was Verizon Network Integration, not Cisco. Cisco sales agents recommended a $487 router when asked by the newspaper what was needed for th...
  • Audie: The clear cast paper advertisement was meant to deceive people. By the way it was written, it was clearly a cloudy way of presentation. It is also pri...
  • Brad: I just received an ad in the mail for this "revolution" promising I could get it for $47 if I was one of the first people to call in. I don't have a ...
  • Phillip Dampier: My personal guess is they will not be touched for the foreseeable future. E-mail addresses are an incredibly customer sensitive issue and many people ...
  • Phillip Dampier: KCMO and KCK will almost certainly remain very aggressively priced because of Google competition, and the granularity of that pricing should be city-w...

Your Account: