<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Tells Employees to Parrot Company Talking Points In Anti-Net Neutrality Comments (But Use Your Personal E-Mail)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/20/att-tells-employees-to-parrot-company-talking-points-in-anti-net-neutrality-comments-but-use-your-personal-e-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/20/att-tells-employees-to-parrot-company-talking-points-in-anti-net-neutrality-comments-but-use-your-personal-e-mail/</link>
	<description>Promoting Better Broadband, Fighting Data Caps, Usage-Based Billing, &#38; Other Internet Overcharging Schemes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stopthecap.com/2009/10/20/att-tells-employees-to-parrot-company-talking-points-in-anti-net-neutrality-comments-but-use-your-personal-e-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-7000</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopthecap.com/?p=5318#comment-7000</guid>
		<description>Phillip, I agree with everything you pointed out especially about wireless carriers. 

It is funny that the only example of a &quot;working&quot;, as they see it, mechanism for anti-Net Neutrality is the wireless networks, which happen to be the most restrictive and the least competitive of comparable Internet plans. Also, if you count cell phone usage in there as well,  the restrictions are ramped up even more with draconian measures in place to restrict what you can watch, hear, or use so that you are forced to use exclusive applications, ring tones, music, or video provided by the cellular provider or an entity that has paid that provider to have access to its customer base. Being against Net Neutrality, is like living under the Soviet regime in West Germany back in the day. Can&#039;t watch that! Can&#039;t hear that! Can&#039;t use that! No, you get what we spoon feed you!

I think this kind of mass emailing should be illegal when it is politically motivated anyways. When you go to work, it should be &quot;about&quot; work and not political issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phillip, I agree with everything you pointed out especially about wireless carriers. </p>
<p>It is funny that the only example of a &#8220;working&#8221;, as they see it, mechanism for anti-Net Neutrality is the wireless networks, which happen to be the most restrictive and the least competitive of comparable Internet plans. Also, if you count cell phone usage in there as well,  the restrictions are ramped up even more with draconian measures in place to restrict what you can watch, hear, or use so that you are forced to use exclusive applications, ring tones, music, or video provided by the cellular provider or an entity that has paid that provider to have access to its customer base. Being against Net Neutrality, is like living under the Soviet regime in West Germany back in the day. Can&#8217;t watch that! Can&#8217;t hear that! Can&#8217;t use that! No, you get what we spoon feed you!</p>
<p>I think this kind of mass emailing should be illegal when it is politically motivated anyways. When you go to work, it should be &#8220;about&#8221; work and not political issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

